So I think a lot of changes are needed for the Leafs to set higher goals than making it to the 2nd round of the playoffs. But realistically, none of them are happening, until Brendan Shanahan gets fired. Getting rid of Keefe, does far less than getting rid of Dubas. Dubas was big, but his enabler and protector of the core is still here.
I don't think that's the case. If Shanahan can axe Dubas, Keefe is small potatoes by comparison. I didn't see the logic in retaining Keefe after Salming's Night let alone into another season. But I did see the need to fire Dubas and so did Shanahan and it played out in an unexpected way.
I don't think the optics of our playoffs performance come without Shanahan seeing what needs to be done. The next steps are easy and difficult, and because the gains we have made as a club, and with what Treliving provided, I think Shanahan's window is closing, but it's not imminent.
Treliving as an add and his adds have stayed Shanahan's replacement for now. However, there are obvious hurdles to overcome:
Easy: Firing Keefe, hiring a Cup winning coach that's available and most importantly, interested in coaching Toronto.
Easy: Stripping the C off of Tavares and handing it to Matthews while giving Nylander and Knies an A each. However, I'm on record as saying we should have renegotiated starting with Nylander and have him as our cap bar and the captain. Feels like I was proven right again, but the optics and what not, Matthews should be given the C.
It also might be a way you motivate Tavares to move on. But see below.
Hard: Finding a fit for Tavares and Marner.
If Treliving is a good move, what does it say about Shanahan acquiring him while FINALLY seeing through Dubas?
I remember when Shanahan first came on, he was criticized for moving too slowly. But for those paying attention, his moves were spot on, all the way until he promoted Dubas, but remember...He did so with Lamoriello's public statement firmly in hand, also endorsing the no-brainer move to do so and that some organization would if we didn't.
Chinese finger-trap really, especially with rumblings of Joe Sakic expressing keen interest in Dubas.
If anything, I think Shanahan can be a little too systematic, granular even that seems as much focused on the appearance as the result. I could care less about the former. But, what firing Dubas demonstrated was the kind of dispassionate analysis we need from a President.
I'm willing to see what plays out in the next few months and over the summer. If the obvious moves don't happen, then all's fair.