TrufleShufle
Registered User
- Aug 31, 2012
- 8,680
- 14,866
In no other arena in the NHL would that puck fly out of that corner like that.
In no other arena in the NHL would that puck fly out of that corner like that.
Show me the list of available players from last years UFA? Bert got 20 goals, but didn’t do much in the playoffs. Unless they are willing to make some bold trades, it will be more of the same
I have no clue why he didn't go to the backhand.
Of all the things you can say about him, you can't truthfully say he has bad hockey IQ. I don't know what the hell he was thinking.
If he scores, maybe they win. They couldn't hold the lead they actually had, but obviously things wouldn't have played out exactly the same way. At the very least he could have said he scored a game seven goal.
Babcock the backstabber, Christ. If he couldn't beat the Bruins with the Leafs he damn sure wasn't gonna let Keefe to it.
I'm not sure who you had in mind that'd realistically be better than Domi and Bertuzzi.
They also had a defence consisting of a #2, a #4, and a bunch of bottom pair/depth guys and only one NHL goalie. $20m doesn't go far with that many holes
hahahahahaha
Bert and Domi earned first line status due to offensive creativity and output. And the Core Fore are solely supposed to be high octane scoring forwards. And "we ignored scoring depth"?![]()
Agreed it wasn't a good goal against.
Sammy just isn't good enough.
Rielly is going to be the next Brodie, better to urge him to waive, move him now while he still has some value……..View attachment 865335
last 3 years (plus this year, which brings Rielly's numbers down)
People have a short memory if they don't think Rielly has been good in the playoffs normally.
I am blaming everyone... there were very few consistently good players... why can no one read? I've not once said the core was fine.
Kling was a good gamble because our problem is offence in the playoffs, and his puck moving ability could have helped in the playoffs generate more O.
This was always my biggest worry with Rielly once his speed is gone it will be 2 more years and he will be outta hockey completely and then we are really in a bad bind .. trade him now while we may get a 1st back .. with his speed i like him on my blueline but without it .. well its over sadly- Rielly does not play physical
- He is not a defensive juggernaut
- He doesn't have a good point shot/slapper/wrister
- His skating has declined this season IMO
All Rielly had was his skating; and its declining. He doesn't have any other attribute that you need in a D-man to be successful in the playoffs
I realized after watching the last 3 games of tight defensive play why this team doesn't play that way most of the time in the playoffs. It's hard...way harder than doing flyby's and dipsy doodles. They don't like to work too hard and this was the first time in 9yrs that we saw them put together more than 1 or 2 good defensive games in a row. The hard work part is what they are allergic to and there is no way they could do that to make the finals.People whine about having a team that plays the trap, but are perfectly fine watching their offensive power dry up every playoffs, I say lose some of the high priced talent and trap away boys, get some D and a goaltender and forwards who can play all three zones of the ice……..
This in a nutshell……..I realized after watching the last 3 games of tight defensive play why this team doesn't play that way most of the time in the playoffs. It's hard...way harder than doing flyby's and dipsy doodles. They don't like to work too hard and this was the first time in 9yrs that we saw them put together more than 1 or 2 good defensive games in a row. The hard work part is what they are allergic to and there is no way they could do that to make the finals.
There’s a reason our record is very good without him. He really doesn’t bring muchThis was always my biggest worry with Rielly once his speed is gone it will be 2 more years and he will be outta hockey completely and then we are really in a bad bind .. trade him now while we may get a 1st back .. with his speed i like him on my blueline but without it .. well its over sadly
Its not luck it is staying on a grind course for as long as it takes .. we failed in OT both Mitch and Rielly .. sad but trueThe Leafs played well, the game was even in all stats even the score after regulation. This game could've gone either way, but the Leafs don't seem to get the luck needed to win these close game sevens. I'm sure that they'll be many changes in the off season.
Blame Samsonov all you want but when half the cap forwards fail to score more than 2 goals and leafs fans continue to blame leaf goalies its quite somthing....
Where is the OFFENSE?
Blame Samsonov all you want but when half the cap forwards fail to score more than 2 goals and leafs fans continue to blame leaf goalies its quite somthing....
Where is the OFFENSE?
None of these names add secondary scoring though.Off the top of my head, I'd have preferred someone like Tarasenko. At least then you have another one-time threat on the PP.
I am sure there are a bunch of combinations of depth signings though, Rodrigues + Acciari or something, still have some leftover, especially since Reaves is not needed as 4RW.
JVR was a decent add for Boston at $1 million.
I'd rather have spent the 5.5 from Bert on Schenn + a 3 million dollar replacement (Rodrigues).
Personnel choices, injuries and Marners inability to carry a line offensively.Gallagbi, let me ask you this, why do the leafs lack this depth
While you are completely correct in an overall sense, at the same time, that was a tight game. Neither team gave up much.
Bruins offense wasn't popping either.
It came down to a goalie duel. Sammy lost. Woll won. Swayman won.
Big picture though? I'm with you. This team is built to score. It's the biggest difference between the Leafs in regular season form and in postseason form.
I'm fine to dump Keefe, but a lot of other coaches would be getting praised missing the players we did and going through our goaltending situationIt’s honestly kind of remarkable we even got to 7 games with an offense than can’t score more than 2 goals per game, a powerplay that had over 20 opportunities and converted less than 5% and a penalty kill that was barely operating at 50% through 4 games
Personnel choices, injuries and Marners inability to carry a line offensively.
We were down a top player in Willy/Matthews for most of the series + McMann. Kampf is fine, but at 2.4M + Reavo at 1.3M with Holmberg around the money could be better spent. Marner was never a threat, so that line becomes a non factor offensively for most of the series.
Not a singular answer really.