me2
Go ahead foot
with gillis there seems to be two contradictory criticisms, one side saying he's overreacted to the 2011 bruins loss and another side saying he hasn't done enough to improve the team
On one hand they complain about too much toughness focus, on the other about releasing Torres and getting softer. It's always interesting when people make the argument that Gillis completely changed the team when it didn't really happen. When you look at the roster changes
* Samuelson was approaching washed up - Booth should have been a replacement while replacing some of Torres physicality.
* Salo for Garrison
* Manny got hurt. - never adequately replaced
* Rome, but Stanton is as tough and a skill upgrade
* Torres - Santorelli (skill upgrade, toughness downgrade)
* Lapierre - Richardson
* bits a pieces like Glass/Weise - aren't worth mentioning
* Raymond - soft but missing his speed
* Ehrhoff - only true skill player not replaced
Pretty much the same team bar the Hoff. Like you said it go old and seemed to oddly happen literally overnight. The question remains, is Gillis the guy to tear it apart? Is he too close to the team like Nonis?
my view would be that this one is on an aging core that may work hard but simply doesn't have the mental fortitude or the high level skill to produce the results that they got 3 years ago, and it's gillis' fault for not recognizing this sooner and preventing any long term deals (ie sedins, burrows) that limit the team's options in the next three years
That's on the GM but really who saw the Sedins imploding this way? They were PPG over the first 10-15 games and looking like business as usual when they signed.
Burrows was iffy.
hodgson/kassian, salo/ehrhoff/garrison...they are important moves but don't matter much when the core of the team looks so painfully slow and feeble on offence, and there is a complete lack of support from young players that should've been drafted 3-4 years ago and should've started making a push to get into the top 6
The 3-4 year ago guys should be AHL or complementary NHLers. I think the bigger issue is the Nonis years and the first 2 of Gillis years, 5-8 year ago players, 23-27 yo in their prime. Where are they? These are the guys that should be carrying the team now, the new core of the team while vets like the Sedins fade to secondary roles.
Last edited: