Player Discussion: Heinola Thread

nobody imp0rtant

Registered pessimist
May 23, 2018
10,949
18,295
Agreed. It's shitty, but the nature of a fracture means it can heal properly. You don't have to deal with extenuating circumstances like you do with strains and sprains. This is probably the best deal for the Jets, because now they don't have to worry about losing a player to waivers.
Yeah, seems like a pretty simple, straight forward recovery. Nothing to worry about here. :eek3:


Disclaimer: I am not a medical professional, but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. :nod:
 

Flair Hay

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2010
12,509
5,738
Winnipeg
Man that's so brutal for him. With Schmidt hurt and Ville playing awesome they were full on giving him a chance to steal Schmidt's job for good.

I was really down on him last year and it was really cool to watch him this pre season outplay... well everybody on our
defense. Definitely going to be eating crow from those who believed in him soon. Just not quite as soon as it looked.
 

FonRiesen

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,339
6,891
Vancouver Island
Agreed. It's shitty, but the nature of a fracture means it can heal properly. You don't have to deal with extenuating circumstances like you do with strains and sprains. This is probably the best deal for the Jets, because now they don't have to worry about losing a player to waivers.
We still have to worry about making the playoffs... Heinola gives a better chance than whomever he'd replace...
 

BoneDocUK

Recovering hockey fandoc
Oct 1, 2015
6,959
14,892
Yeah, seems like a pretty simple, straight forward recovery. Nothing to worry about here. :eek3:


Disclaimer: I am not a medical professional, but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. :nod:

^^^

Wouldn't necessarily expect the (relatively uncommon) complications listed above in this case and with the quality of treatment he's likely to receive but rehabbing can take time and ankles can be heavily stressed, especially for a D who's pivoting, changing stride, decelerating quickly etc.

** Disclaimer: I'm not an ortho, although I've done enough ankles in my day through various rotations. **

I'm a bit bemused by comments above the possible involvement of rink doors or panels in this though. That's pretty damn shoddy, and IIRC wasn't their a Jet fairly recently who caught a skate in such a gap?

Tough news, esp given the timing and the stakes, but I'll be pulling for him.
 
Last edited:

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
8,367
20,347
Hopefully it's just his fibula. I'd imagine a longer timeline if his tibia was involved
 

Boonk

Registered User
Oct 10, 2017
2,928
3,958
It sucks that we can’t have nice things for this team sometimes :,(

Brutal, shit luck.
 

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
32,714
43,460
Winnipeg
Hopefully it's just his fibula. I'd imagine a longer timeline if his tibia was involved
Yeah, not everyone appreciates that the ankle isn't a single bone but 3 bones. The Tibia, Fibula and Talus, and an ankle fracture could be 1, 2 or all 3 of them. If there is more than one bone it is usually a displaced fracture where the ankle basically separates and is then surgically repaired with plates and screws to hold it together while it heals. If this happens then there is often also ligament damage as well, not much different then having a high ankle sprain on top of the fracture. I just know this as I fractured my ankle when I was younger where all 3 bones were broken as well as the ligament torn. Had surgery and plates and screws inserted. Took me 3 months before I could even start any type of real rehab.
 

jetsforever

Registered User
Dec 14, 2013
28,048
24,546
Sucks that he got injured but the silver lining is our roster decisions are easier now and when he's recovered there might be another injury or some reason to get him into the lineup
 

Larabee

Registered User
Mar 10, 2011
2,869
3,616
Winnipeg
Heinola’s injury should give some bigger body defence men like Capo and Chis a chance to play. I think they are the future. Nothing against Heinola, but we already have Pionk. Heinola and Pionk bring the same game to the table. We only need one of them.
 

ps241

The Ballad of Ville Bobby
Sponsor
Mar 10, 2010
35,557
33,905
Heinola’s injury should give some bigger body defence men like Capo and Chis a chance to play. I think they are the future. Nothing against Heinola, but we already have Pionk. Heinola and Pionk bring the same game to the table. We only need one of them.

Who’s the future?
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,610
13,123
South Mountain
Can they keep him on the NHL roster and IR him so that he can at least get paid in NHL dollars?

Assuming Winnipeg places Heinola on IR before opening day he will have both a reduced cap hit and receive a reduce salary. This is know as SOIR (season opening IR). Players on two-way contracts with less than 50 games on the NHL roster the previous season are eligible for SOIR if injured in training camp, or reporting to training camp injured.

Heinola spent 48 of 185 days on the NHL last season and the other 137 days in the AHL. Using those numbers the SOIR formulas are:

SOIR Cap Hit: $863,333 cap hit * 48 / 185 = $224,778

SOIR Salary: $832,500 NHL salary * 48 / 185 + $70,000 AHL salary * 137 / 185 = $267,838 salary while on SOIR.
 

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
32,714
43,460
Winnipeg
Assuming Winnipeg places Heinola on IR before opening day he will have both a reduced cap hit and receive a reduce salary. This is know as SOIR (season opening IR). Players on two-way contracts with less than 50 games on the NHL roster the previous season are eligible for SOIR if injured in training camp, or reporting to training camp injured.

Heinola spent 48 of 185 days on the NHL last season and the other 137 days in the AHL. Using those numbers the SOIR formulas are:

SOIR Cap Hit: $863,333 cap hit * 48 / 185 = $224,778

SOIR Salary: $832,500 NHL salary * 48 / 185 + $70,000 AHL salary * 137 / 185 = $267,838 salary while on SOIR.
Thanks. It is always great to get the little known details of these types of things.
 

ps241

The Ballad of Ville Bobby
Sponsor
Mar 10, 2010
35,557
33,905
Can’t read ?



When you use Capo and Chis as references for the future your point is murky at best because I know you can’t mean that since they are at best 7-8 types right now. That’s not the future. Size (I am guessing that is your point) without enough NHL talent is filler that doesn’t move the needle. Also I assume you mean Chisholm and he is in the same zip code size wise as Morrissey, Pionk, Heinola (all four are listed between 6’ and 6’2 and between 185-195 pounds on the Jets website)? Even Capo is listed as 6’2‘and 200 and that is not much different?

Moving past splitting hairs on the size of Capo and Chis what about TNSE leads you to believe our future is different than our present? Our roster as constructed took 13 years in the making. In 13 years we have drafted 1.5 defensmen that are/were big and good enough to play in the top 4 in the NHL (Trouba and maybe….maybe Samberg). If Samberg doesn’t stick in the top 4 we have zero big D men drafted that still play in our top 4. Their drafting track record based on your priority would tell me it’s never going to come together. When we draft for size we are just as likely to end up with the Cederholm or Stanley types which are not the future. As recently as 2020 the team still drafted Kuzmin so they didn’t get the memo about avoiding smallish D men.

Our trading track record for skilled enough D men with size is very sketchy. Dillon checks the box but for every Dillon we are just as likely to end up with a Schmidt, or a Pionk.

Our future under a Chipman Chevy tandem is crystal clear to me. Love it or hate it they are going to keep drafting BPA, trade for BPA, and they will dress the best six D men and if that means they have two or three players that are 6’ 185 they won’t compromise to play lesser talent with more size.
 
Last edited:

Flair Hay

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2010
12,509
5,738
Winnipeg
Heinola’s injury should give some bigger body defence men like Capo and Chis a chance to play. I think they are the future. Nothing against Heinola, but we already have Pionk. Heinola and Pionk bring the same game to the table. We only need one of them.

The way Heinola was playing, it looked like he was well on his way to surpassing Schmidt and Pionk by the end of the year.

It's only one camp, but he is just such a better skater than both. Now that his body and his confidence are starting to catch up, those flashes started to become almost every shift for him

There is only room for 2 of Pionk Schmidt Ville and I think it's becoming clear Schmidt better be on his toes or he won't be one of the two.
 

BoneDocUK

Recovering hockey fandoc
Oct 1, 2015
6,959
14,892
When you use Capo and Chis as references for the future your point is murky at best because I know you can’t mean that since they are at best 7-8 types right now. That’s not the future. Size (I am guessing that is your point) without enough NHL talent is filler that doesn’t move the needle. Also I assume you mean Chisholm and he is not big and is in the same zip code size wise as Morrissey, Pionk, Heinola (all four are listed between 6’ and 6’2 and between 185-195 pounds on the Jets website)? Even Capo is listed as 6’2‘and 200 and that is not much different?

Moving past splitting hairs on the size of Capo and Chis what about TNSE leads you to believe our future is different than our present? Our roster as constructed took 13 years in the making. In 13 years we have drafted 1.5 defensmen that are/were big and good enough to play in the top 4 in the NHL (Trouba and maybe….maybe Samberg). If Samberg doesn’t stick in the top 4 we have zero big D men drafted that still play in our top 4. Their drafting track record based on your priority would tell me it’s never going to come together. When we draft for size we are just as likely to end up with the Cederholm or Stanley types which are not the future. As recently as 2020 the team still drafted Kuzmin so they didn’t get the memo about avoiding smallish D men.

Our trading track record for skilled enough D men with size is very sketchy. Dillon checks the box but for every Dillon we are just as likely to end up with a Schmidt, or a Pionk.

Our future under a Chipman Chevy tandem is crystal clear to me. Love it or hate it they are going to keep drafting BPA, trade for BPA, and they will dress the best six D men and if that means they have two or three players that are 6’ 185 they won’t compromise to play lesser talent with more size.

Agree on all points.

Would just add that according to various pundits around camp, Heinola is now 6.1 and at least 185 -- and was nicknamed "The Finnish Tank" by at least one local journo, so he ain't a wee kid anymore.

Like Peak Pionk, who has arguably been our nastiest and pestiest D when on form since Trouba left, it's maybe more about the size of the fight in the dog than we realize.

A Heinola / Samberg combo should be plenty big and skilled enough to do well on a second / third pairing intially, as they get bedded in, and if a solid second pairing is their ceiling, that's still rare enough in the Jets' recent drafting to be a significant draft success and value asset.

Anyway, looking forward to this thread reopening with some real fanfare in a few months' time when Ville is back on his feet and hopefully challenging again for a spot. At least they now have a better read on his growth as a player and where he might fit into a revamped lineup in the future.
 

bumblebeeman

Registered User
Mar 16, 2016
2,042
1,376
Heinola’s injury should give some bigger body defence men like Capo and Chis a chance to play. I think they are the future. Nothing against Heinola, but we already have Pionk. Heinola and Pionk bring the same game to the table. We only need one of them.

Pionk is probably gone after next year, unless he gets traded before his contract is up. Maybe if he takes a discount he gets brought back but we'll see. Also I think Pionk is a lot more physical, but Heinola could be a better puck mover and higher IQ player. But they are roughly the same size, so there's that. But Morrissey, Schmidt and Demelo are that size too (tho slightly more weight).
 

GNP

Here Comes the Jets -look out hockey world !!!
Oct 11, 2016
9,464
13,662
Winnipeg
Pionk is probably gone after next year, unless he gets traded before his contract is up. Maybe if he takes a discount he gets brought back but we'll see. Also I think Pionk is a lot more physical, but Heinola could be a better puck mover and higher IQ player. But they are roughly the same size, so there's that. But Morrissey, Schmidt and Demelo are that size too (tho slightly more weight).
I'd like to see the Jets get rid of their undersized defenseman, that are highly paid, and go with bigger more physical Dmen, unless they're very talented like Morrissey, then you keep those types of smaller type defenseman. Pionk and Schmidt are the next likely to go. I'd like to see Capo in the lineup. He has a great shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sipowicz

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $85.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $50,050.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad