At this point it seems Theo Fleury is the only ex player not nominated, so for the sake of fairness, I hereby do so.
If we reunited him with Lindros and York as assistants we could have the "superFLY" coaching team
At this point it seems Theo Fleury is the only ex player not nominated, so for the sake of fairness, I hereby do so.
At this point it seems Theo Fleury is the only ex player not nominated, so for the sake of fairness, I hereby do so.
At this point it seems Theo Fleury is the only ex player not nominated, so for the sake of fairness, I hereby do so.
I've several times heard of very successful teams, even coaches, who the players basically thought was worthless. How the players descibed the coach as someone who just was in the way and how they had to coach themselves basically.
Sure, He contributed to the development of Anisimov, Dubinsky, Callahan, Sauer, as well as other players. He's had a winning record every season and missed the playoffs twice. If you look at his rosters, especially defense, it's quite shocking to see the things he was able to accomplish with the players he had. Hartford was always full of Derek Armstrongs, Brad Smyths, and Todd Halls...hes winning with Yogans, Bourques, Hriviks.
I felt like his coaching style has been a bit hindered by Tortorella. Torts said himself that Gernander has skaters ready that know his system. He's not an incompetent person. He's a leader, he's play offense and defense, and he's been around a few NHL coaches.
I honestly wouldn't put too much stock into what some of the "scouts" on this board say. You can take what i say with a grain of salt, don't care. But I think he would know a little more about the game than someone who streams games over a computer. I would say overall...his job to develop and get kids ready for the NHL game...he's done a pretty good job at it considering some of the teams he's had to work with.
What makes him a terrible coach? His lines? System? Just wondering why everyone else on this board thinks hes bad.
On a more serious note...hearing that teams are competiting for Eakins. Wonder if the Rangers are one of them?
They did request permission to interview him, but I never heard whether or not the interview had actually taken place. He's been my guy from the get go.
The Rangers got permission but have not interviewed him —or anyone else for that matter. I think they are going to start interviews during their organizational meetings next week.
Ah, gotcha. Sounds like this team is going to be late to the party.
Ah, gotcha. Sounds like this team is going to be late to the party.
I think it also shows that they were never planning on dismissing Torts until something pretty drastic changed.
So Hank ran a coach out. He better win a Cup like Messier did.
My gut says there were more players than just Hank, but if that's the case that means this core has run two coaches out of town in the last 4 years. That's.. a bit disconcerting.
Can't believe nobody mentioned Christopher Walken. He would be a tremendous presence behind the bench. "You're going about it all wrong...I don't like you're tone"
My gut says there were more players than just Hank, but if that's the case that means this core has run two coaches out of town in the last 4 years. That's.. a bit disconcerting.
Yeah, frankly, I don't buy that.
What I do buy is that Pittsburgh has below-average personnel on the blueline and an unreliable goaltending situation.
We just had the closest thing to Christopher Walken coach that we're ever going to have, and you want to bring that back?
I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more jam.
Can't believe nobody mentioned Christopher Walken. He would be a tremendous presence behind the bench. "You're going about it all wrong...I don't like you're tone"