Has Mike Sullivan Been Fired Yet?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Rossi spent some time with people around Sullivan to look at his coaching style ahead of the 4 Nations Tournament. Some thoughts from people like Bill Guerin, Rick Bowness and Dave King (who both coached Sullivan and then against him), and even some players like Kevin Hayes and Tristan Jarry.

Here's Hayes:
“He tells you how it is,” Hayes said of Sullivan. “It’s best when you don’t hear a lot from him because that means you’re playing up to his standard. And when you’re not, he’ll let you know. He doesn’t let things linger. And he’s willing to give you a little leeway if you buy into what he wants.”

Here's Jarry:
“I think he’s a great coach and a great person,” Jarry said. “I think the thing that makes him a great coach is he can do what’s best for the team, but you also know he cares about you as a person.

“There are no mixed messages with him. He says what he thinks. He lets you talk. And you come out of it knowing that he’s doing what he thinks is best for the team, but he also wants you to know you’re still part of it.”


I still think his time has come to an end in Pittsburgh. It'd be best to have a new voice as the Pens turn the page on the Crosby-Malkin era. But I do think this provides some insight as to why people think highly of Sullivan around the NHL and still in the locker room.
 
Also, asking Tristan "I played myself out of the AHL" Jarry for quotes on coaching genius is pretty amazingly shameless. :laugh:
I think it's actually worthwhile journalism - if you ask someone like Rust, who Sullivan openly praises and who gets a lot of leeway, then of course he's going to be positive. But if you talk to someone who has had a rocky time, you might get a more honest assessment.

As for understanding the problems, I think the players do understand the issues. I just don't think they're capable of fixing them.
 
Rossi spent some time with people around Sullivan to look at his coaching style ahead of the 4 Nations Tournament. Some thoughts from people like Bill Guerin, Rick Bowness and Dave King (who both coached Sullivan and then against him), and even some players like Kevin Hayes and Tristan Jarry.

Here's Hayes:
“He tells you how it is,” Hayes said of Sullivan. “It’s best when you don’t hear a lot from him because that means you’re playing up to his standard. And when you’re not, he’ll let you know. He doesn’t let things linger. And he’s willing to give you a little leeway if you buy into what he wants.”

Here's Jarry:
“I think he’s a great coach and a great person,” Jarry said. “I think the thing that makes him a great coach is he can do what’s best for the team, but you also know he cares about you as a person.

“There are no mixed messages with him. He says what he thinks. He lets you talk. And you come out of it knowing that he’s doing what he thinks is best for the team, but he also wants you to know you’re still part of it.”


I still think his time has come to an end in Pittsburgh. It'd be best to have a new voice as the Pens turn the page on the Crosby-Malkin era. But I do think this provides some insight as to why people think highly of Sullivan around the NHL and still in the locker room.
That article didn't say a single thing about what actually makes him a good coach.

"He's great because he tells you like it is". That's it? That's the best they could get?

I can tell Jarry that he sucks and Hayes is washed up. I guess this makes me a great NHL coach now.
 
That article didn't say a single thing about what actually makes him a good coach.

"He's great because he tells you like it is". That's it? That's the best they could get?

I can tell Jarry that he sucks and Hayes is washed up. I guess this makes me a great NHL coach now.

Yeah got halfway through the article and realized it was the typical fluff our media puts out regarding this jack ass.
 
Asking any player about their coach will always yield glowing praise.
Especially the one who has a say in whether or not you will be stuck in the minors forever. :laugh:

That article didn't say a single thing about what actually makes him a good coach.

"He's great because he tells you like it is". That's it? That's the best they could get?

I can tell Jarry that he sucks and Hayes is washed up. I guess this makes me a great NHL coach now.
It's because he doesn't actually coach. :laugh: It's so insanely transparent.
 
I still think his time has come to an end in Pittsburgh. It'd be best to have a new voice as the Pens turn the page on the Crosby-Malkin era. But I do think this provides some insight as to why people think highly of Sullivan around the NHL and still in the locker room.
Do you expects employees to say "Honestly, my boss doesn't have a clue what he is doing"? Those interviews are even more pointless than post-game interviews and those are already almost always a waste of time for everyone involved.

And even the players are being honest, so what? Even if Sullivan is amazing person and everyone in the team loves him, they are supposedly in the business of winning hockey games, not feeling good about themselves for the sake of feeling good about themselves. If anything, keeping a stale coach around lest you hurt someone's feelings is even dumber than keeping him around because you have deluded yourself that he can still be a good coach for this particular team.
 
"He tells you how it is,” Hayes said of Sullivan. “It’s best when you don’t hear a lot from him because that means you’re playing up to his standard. And when you’re not, he’ll let you know. He doesn’t let things linger. And he’s willing to give you a little leeway if you buy into what he wants.

Although sullivan not talking to you is presented as praise by him and for him, i actually think this is a terrible trait for a coach

It's going to ultimately make people have less confidence in themselves second guessing, i feel. Cause then you're doing something and waiting for him to tell you you're wrong, and if you're not being coached for being wrong, then you really don't know what the exact something is that you're doing right, either. So you just keep throwing shit against the wall in your own personal gameplay until told to stop????

You need positive feedback too...

And that last sentence... Lol.. Really means: If you're in the circle of trust you can f*** around all you want
 
He should have 5 or 6, but this stupid ass team and incompetent GM's have held him back
 
i think we want a new voice, but it's just hard to know what is really going on.
We've seen our star players be coach killers and ignore whomever is talking and just do their own thing. But the reality is our team is really really old. old players are inconsistent at times. we have a problem with team speed on this team. Are there any old and slow teams in today's NHL that are strong playoff teams? Edmonton is older (only team) but the difference is its because they have older complimentary players that are not counted on to do much and their team speed is way higher then ours. Penguins, our old players are also our best players, that is a HUGE problem if you want to be a playoff team especially when they are all pushing 40 which is ancient in the NHL, huge props that they contribute what they do. You could put herb brooks over this roster and it's not gonna do jack
 
If Sullivan was as bad as you say he is, he wouldn't have won us two cups.
He WAS good. He was the voice we needed. He was the one getting the players on the same page. The pregame, intermission, and postgame videos from the locker room were great.

That sullivan got lost in the forest about 2019.

The Sullivan we have now, is not 2016 Sullivan.

... The team being old or GMs failing him, is also a lame excuse.

If the roster was being built so poorly, and he had a hand on it, then it's on him. If it was built so poorly that he couldn't make it work and said nothing about that, it's also on him. There's no way GMs are sending multiple firsts out grabbing random players without a meeting.

The players play. The coach puts them in position to win. The GM gives the players the coach needs.

Sullivan has seen three GMs, each team has gotten steadily worse. He's the common denominator. If he was a magician, he could have made any team work. Yet here we.

As a fan, this is a zero sum business. No fan really cares about developing talent seven years out. And they don't care about seven years ago. We care about now and what have you done recently.

If you're more evolved than that cool, you're awesome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cygnus47
Mike Sullivan has an absolutely dogshit record as a coach (and Boston assistant) beyond two glorious seasons. That's a fact.

Obviously we're all thankful for those two seasons. But at this point if you still think dude is some kind of genius team-building architect of success then I don't really know what to tell you beyond "go tend to your living room shrine."

Crazy thought... perhaps aggressive roster building by the GM combined with some truly generational players were farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr more responsible than some doofus who fiddles around with his glasses all game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BusinessGoose

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad