the valiant effort
settle down, bud
- Apr 17, 2017
- 5,497
- 6,907
Nobody says Fleury is on Brodeur and Roy's tier.Doesn’t sound as good when he was probably closer to borderline top 10 for the first half of the decade.
Yea, he’s a good goalie, but IMO you’re more so talking about Brodeur, Luongo and Roy, who were consistently and undoubtedly top 10 goalies for a LONG TIME. What Fleury did is rare, but he still lags behind those guys when it comes to longevity IMO.
To be fair, Luongo has a career .919 SV% (over 1000gp), which is just crazy to think about.Nobody says Fleury is on Brodeur and Roy's tier.
People say Fleury is on Luongo's tier because those two have similar resumes.
And you're underselling Fleury's legacy. His prime lasted 14 years (2007-21). Those years overlapped with the primes of Brodeur, Lundqvist, Rinne, Price, Quick, Luongo, and Bobrovsky among others who had shorter (but still phenomenol) peaks.
Being a Top 5-10 goaltender during that stretch is more impressive than being a Top 5 goaltender now. An underdiscussed reason for the increase in scoring is how much worse the current generation of goaltenders are compared to the 2010s.
And those are designed to get attention by any means necessary, the easiest way to do that is outrage clicks.
Do you really think those guys believe everything they say and write?
For someone to be overrated they need to be rated highly by a lot of people.Darcy Kuemper says hi. Maybe Adin Hill too.
Pittsburgh media are saying Bryan Rust should be on USA for the Olympics. It's dumb stuff to try to get attention, it's not real life. Nobody actually thinks that Fleury is a Rushmore goalie.Oh no of course not, but just the fact that it is a discussion at all...
Fleury has a Vezina?!
EDIT: ah, right. A “Vezina”
To be fair, Luongo has a career .919 SV% (over 1000gp), which is just crazy to think about.
Faced way more shots than Fleury could dream of, and practically fought for every win and shutout on some god awful, unimaginable Panthers Teams.
The early Canucks teams were not much better either, he was easily their most valuable player. Luongo only had a brief period (‘09-13), where he legitimately had a good team in front of him and as much as people want to trash on Luongo’s chokes during those years, his numbers are lightyears better than Fleury’s (10-14) and he has a Gold medal to boot for in that same time period (he ACTUALLY contributed to that 2010 medal).
I mean I don't get how you can put Fleury next to Luongo when it's seen as general conseus by most people that Luongo was a top 5 goalie from 2004-2011. Fleury never had that sort of a stretch and Luongo matches him in longevitiy. Stanley Cups for Fleury sure, but let's not underrate Luongo now.
You can easily argue and be right saying Crawford.I know. I'm going to get a lot of flack for this. I think he's a very good goalie and his longevity speaks for itself, but I don't think he was the best-of-the-best for his generation. Hot take: I don't think Marc-Andre Fleury was ever consistently a top 5 goalie in the NHL. I still think being top 10 over stretches is impressive, but I don't understand how some people can justify putting him over Lundqvist or Price. Still a HHOF and a good goalie.
2005-2010
I'd comfortably put these goalies over him:
Brodeur
Luongo
Kiprusoff
Lundqvist
Nabokov
Thomas
Miller
2010-2015:
Statistically, Fleury's worst 5-year stretch. Lost his starting job a couple times and was often dubbed as a "choker" in the playoffs:
Lundqvist
Price
Quick
Rinne
Rask
Luongo
*I think you could argue Crawford here too
2015-2020
Vasilevsiky
Price
Bobrovsky
Rask
Bishop
Rinne
Lundqvist
(More of a case for Fleury here, but still not very convincing).
I know he won the Vezina in 2021, but would you actually consider him to be a top 5 tendy in 2021? Over Vasi, Helle, Saros, Shersterkin and others?? No doubt a great season by him, but I felt like he was given the Vezina as a gift.
You act like Vokoun was never acquired and that he didn’t outplay Fleury while the big bad Dan Bylsma was still there lmaoFleury had some low lows and some high highs. He’s like a gunslinging QB in the NFL. When you rely on your talent and athleticism over mechanics, it’s going to lead to some highlight reel saves and some blunders.
It also didn’t help that he played behind Dan Bylsma’s “system” - if you can call it that, for quite awhile including all of the playoff blowups that gave him his negative reputation. A lot of people do not want to admit it but goalies and their stats are greatly at the mercy of the team around them. It’s no surprise he won his Vezina after he went elsewhere.
I don’t know how he could be overrated when it seems like half the people, at least on here, think he was terrible.
Regardless of how people rate him, he’s been one of the most entertaining goalies of his generation and possibly the last of his kind now that goalies have angles and mechanics drilled into their DNA and don’t just go out there and try to keep the puck out of the net anyway possible which seems to have been MAF’s plan all along.
Casual detectedSaying MAF is "overrated" at any stage of his career when he has more wins than Lundqvist, Belfour and Roy feels like an exercise reaching for all kinds of haunted compulsion.
Appreciate your caveat as a Flyers fan.
Their depth those years was better than the depth they had in 09 FOH lmaoWasn't all him. Their depth between 2011-2015 or so wasn't great. 2012 is the only year he really blew it for them. When everyone suddenly started making bad trades with them, their fortunes turned.
What decade was that? The only mistake they made was trusting Tristan Jarry.Penguins management underrating Fleury caused them nearly a decade of goaltending issues.
Yeah they had the best team in the league for a few years and were let down by Fleury and BylsmaTheir depth those years was better than the depth they had in 09 FOH lmao