- Sep 1, 2010
- 10,018
- 7,979
Ricky's post reminded me to check the career totals for this season's older guys on Pack
It does seem accurate that that they won't need to be watching how many vets dress for any games with current roster
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Name[/TD]
[TD]birthdate[/TD]
[TD]Reg Season pro games <Oct'23[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Nash[/TD]
[TD]8905[/TD]
[TD]>320[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Belzile[/TD]
[TD]9108[/TD]
[TD]>320[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Elson[/TD]
[TD]9209[/TD]
[TD]>320[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Brodzinzki[/TD]
[TD]9306[/TD]
[TD]>320[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Harpur[/TD]
[TD]9501[/TD]
[TD]>320[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Brouillard[/TD]
[TD]9502[/TD]
[TD]168(+39ECHL[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Blidh[/TD]
[TD]9503[/TD]
[TD]>320[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Hillman[/TD]
[TD]9601[/TD]
[TD]129(+91ECHL[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]DiGiacinto[/TD]
[TD]9601[/TD]
[TD]83(+31ECHL[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mackey[/TD]
[TD]9609[/TD]
[TD]119[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Hollowell[/TD]
[TD]9809[/TD]
[TD]130[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Leschyshyn[/TD]
[TD]9903[/TD]
[TD]231[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Frequently Asked Questions
"What is the AHL’s development rule?
Of the 18 skaters (not counting two goaltenders) that teams may dress for a game, at least 13 must be qualified as "development players."
Of those 13, 12 must have played in 260 or fewer professional games (including AHL, NHL and European elite leagues), and one must have played in 320 or fewer professional games.
All calculations for development status are based on regular-season totals as of the start of the season."
here is earlier post re AHL veteran rule
please feel free to double check
my research and math,
and my understanding of the text
it seems that of the 6 'vets' ( > 260 games)
at least ONE had to have total career games <320 to be the 13th 'dev' player
but all 6 have > 320
so a guy had to sit, and yesterday that was Blidh