Relax. I never said that is the price or that is what the Blues HAVE to pay. I'm just saying that on either side of this scenario I would rather have an extended Lindholm.
He is the best defensemen the Ducks have ever drafted. He is the best player on the Ducks. He is a legit top pairing defensemen and he is only 27.
Those don't come around very often.
I appreciate how valuable he is to you. If I were a Duck fan I'd be very disappointed if he doesn't extend. This whole discussion takes place in a world where he isn't doing that and Anaheim management knows it.
Hypothetical. Let's say Tarasenko, who is only 29 and is a legit top line forward and one of the best players the Blues have ever drafted, still wants to be traded. Suppose he's got 25g, 25a by the 2/3 mark of the season and it's clear to all observers he is over his injuries with a vengeance (say, like Lindholm).
Should the Blues expect three firsts, or two firsts
and a team's top prospect? I wouldn't expect it. So as long as you would say yes both players being worth that then you're being consistent. In case Tarasenko having the extra year is cited, I'd argue that's got as many pros as cons comparatively and may make him worth more.