Had Lombardi matched the 5 year contract for Gaborik, he would most likely be a King. It was a risk that I would have wanted to take at that time. Pretty much every free agent is going to cost more than they're worth, to say they ALL would cost EVEN MORE to come to LA is an overstatement.
The Sutter bashing is premature here. For all the people that wanted TM gone, you would think they would be at least content with Sutter. Give the guy 10 games before dishing out all this hate.
This is too easy to prove wrong...And where would be the fun in that?
Some people just cannot be satisfied. Murray was not to blame for the Kings' woes, the lack of production by the Kings' players is to blame...you can't squeeze blood from a turnip.
Yeah. Lombardi really sucks. He does only bad things. Except those that are good, but they don't count, because they just fall in his lap.
![]()
The problem with Dean Lombardi is that he's almost too calculated and strategic. Hes risk averse. Will never stray from what led to success (semi success?) in the past for him.
The problem with this methodology in general is that risk is a prerequisite for high reward. Not just this situation, but in general in life. You don't become wealthy off investing in low risk mutual funds; you preserve your capital and maybe make an average return. But thats the best you can expect. AVERAGE.
Dean Lombardi always settles for average. Never strays from what he thinks has worked for him in the past and the people he knows. The signing of DS proves just that. Hes going for the low risk move. Does he know in the back of his head that he might not be the best fit long-term? He has to. But for the time being, DS will most likely take this team into the playoffs this year. Thats about it though.
Look at Dean Lombardi's history. EVERY single free agent and signing he has made has been a player that was either 1) Injured so he got good value on them or 2) maligned in some way. Mike Richards being the only exception.That happened to fall in his lap. However, if DL didnt have ties to the Flyers, i can almost guarantee we dont have MR today.
He really only deals with teams hes familiar with and nothing else. Again, back to the idea of not straying from what he knows, which translates into virtually no risk. Quite frankly, this methodology is ingrained in his being and will never change. The problem is that when you settle for average, the best return you could ever expect is slightly above average results. You will never turn average into superior returns or results, just like you could never expect high returns on safe investments..
Not to nitpick but MR was aquired in a trade, not free agency. Scuderi might have been a better exception.
Well, actually 27th, but I see your point. But, he also had far less offensive talent then the Kings now have. He lead a team of Iginla, Kipper, Langkow, a rookie Phaneuf and a bunch of grinders to a division title with a 103 point season.
Dont have much faith in Sutter to turn around the King's offensive woes, but I do expect him to come in a change the atmosphere in the locker room. Hopefully he can get the players to give more than they did under TM. The Sutter bashing is premature here. For all the people that wanted TM gone, you would think they would be at least content with Sutter. Give the guy 10 games before dishing out all this hate.
If AEG/Leiweke decides to replace Lombardi, whenever that may be, who do you guys think would be a good GM candidate to take over the management duties? Some names to consider:
Ron Hextall, Craig Patrick, Dave Nonis, Jim Nill, Tim Burke, Michael Futa, Rick Dudley
Brad Richards 2009-2010/11 = 18 goals, 0.12 ppg
Brad Richards this season = 1 goal, 0.05 ppg
No, it actually was 28th. They only beat Chicago and St. Louis in scoring that year.
I do agree that he did well with what he had, I just disagreed with the author suggesting it was dynamic. The defense was dynamic that year but Sutter hardly turned coacl into diamonds with the offense that year.
Dont have much faith in Sutter to turn around the King's offensive woes, but I do expect him to come in a change the atmosphere in the locker room. Hopefully he can get the players to give more than they did under TM. The Sutter bashing is premature here. For all the people that wanted TM gone, you would think they would be at least content with Sutter. Give the guy 10 games before dishing out all this hate.
How long will it take before the Iginla to LA rumors begin to swirl? No Doubt, sooner or later Lombardi & Sutter are going to end up calling Calgary to talk forwards.
The problem with Dean Lombardi is that he's almost too calculated and strategic. Hes risk averse. Will never stray from what led to success (semi success?) in the past for him.
Crap. At least I know someone read my post.When did he get here? Did TM's system suck so bad it made him invisible?![]()