This one. The one in this thread (OP).
. I don't care about he "Habs" grouping narratives. It's garbage on HF boards and a flawed culture many are falling into. But go ahead, we are either loved or hated with no in the middle. Bandwagon parties don't move the needle with me. "Popularity" BS
I know you like to point out how unfair the criticism is towards Habs fans, but these deals are terrible for all the non-Habs teams.
1) Girard is a 23 year old #3 dman, signed at a very good cap for the next 5.5 years. Playes like this don't get traded just because. I would say the value of Girard is probably 2 x late 1st round picks, and you want Kuemper whom the Avs just traded a 1st and a young NHL RHD for. So even if that price is reduced, Keumper is worth at least the 1st to Colorado, so you think Price is worth that much. I know you have stated that the Habs would retain 50% (which of coarse you don't actually know) but this thread says 20% which makes his cap hit $8.75 for the next 4.5 years. Too much for an aging player with lots of red flags. So this is not a good deal for the Avs
2) Gallagher to Nashville for their most recent 1st round pick and another 1st. You truly believe that Gallagher with his long term $6.5 x 5.5 years. His age, style of play is worth a teams 2 best young assets. This also ignores the fact that the Preds are actively trying to shed older players and build up their youth. Again a bad deal for the Preds
3) Petry for Duck's 1st and Guhle - Ducks are in no position to be adding a 34 year old player, especially at the cost of a 1st round pick. The Ducks are over achieving this year and to sell your own rebuild short by adding a 34 year old defender that has clearly started to slow down, still signed for another 3.5 years and no retention is very short sighted and the way to ruin a teams long range development plan. Petry might get a 1st with retention, but not from a rebuilding team like the Ducks, where Petry will be a pro athlete senior citizen by the time they are actual contenders. Bad for the Ducks
4) Chiarot for a top prospect and an injured player that when healthy is better than Chiarot. The last thing the Oilers need to do is trade away inexpensive talent. If they do decide to rebuild, LHD is not the first priority so it would be pretty stupid to overspend (no team is offering a prospect of Holloway's level for Chiarot) on an okay player but not a top need. The add of Klefbom also messes with the Oilers tight cap. His LTIR helps the team dress a full team. If Klef ever comes back, he's a better player than Chia, so the entire offer s not good for the Oilers.
So can you let me know why you would think these are bad for the Habs? Not one of these deals makes sense for the other teams, yet you want to complain about Habs grouping narrative - nope they're just bad deals for the non-Habs teams plain and simple.