All of those guys came in as basically NHL-ready impact players and then regressed, same with Boeser. Horvat basically flatlined. Then all of them exploded after Green was fired.
i forgot boeser. could any of their development delay issues be perhaps attributed to other things like covid or the team's overall quality, or can you state with any certainty that it was green?
because all i see is your subjective take that players who have since developed into the core of the team were harmed or held back by green but then perservered, as opposed to other causes or just natural career progression to explain their career arcs? how do you zero in on green?
otoh, can you refute my take that only one young player i can think of, dowd*, has played better since leaving the canucks after green? to me a hallmark of a bad coach is players who are held back by him and then leave and thrive elsewhere. you'd certainly expect to see some if he's the worst coach you've ever seen at integrating young players.
the absence of such players to me is a very strong indication green was not holding young player development back. it's one of many reasons i think the verdict is out on green as a coach. i don't think he's likely to be exceptional, but i think he may be a competent coach who was saddled here with badly built teams, an immature core, and the circumstances of covid.
* i will grant you gudbranson had that one goodish season.