Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Training Camp Begins

Status
Not open for further replies.

wonton15

Kiefer Sherwood
Dec 13, 2009
20,660
30,567
Just wanna say Allvin is a god.

I remember all our roster projections and it was a struggle to build a competitive team and still somehow fit under the cap.

Well, season is about to start and our roster looks as good as anyone could have predicted and we still somehow have 1.25M in cap space.

Guy just finds a way.
Doing all this while paying to undo Benning’s parting gifts and icing one of the deepest teams we’ve seen is impressive as hell.
 

Billy Kvcmu

Registered User
Dec 5, 2014
28,604
17,387
West Vancouver
Oh I definitely don’t think Yzerman is some sort of God-level GM. It’s difficult to transition after years of going through a tear down build through the draft process when you don’t start with Stamkos and Hedman and add a Kucherov and Point etc in the process.

But it would be intellectually dishonest (do people still use this phrase?) if I thought the Wings extracted a huge price from the Canucks then heavily criticize Yzerman for not shopping Hronek to every team.
Not me, i think the Hronek trade was pretty fair value at the time

Fans just had PTSD from Jim Benning
 
  • Like
Reactions: andora

StickShift

In a pickle 🥒
Feb 29, 2004
7,460
6,399
New York
Can't send down Silovs (or at least would need to recall someone else at barely any savings) while Demko is injured and on IR, we need 2 goalies on roster. So by yo-yoing Raty that's only like 250K of savings, which is relatively insignificant
They could just put Friedman up and down on waivers too for the next 30 days to serve the same purpose.
 

Wisp

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
7,660
2,260
green deserves some credit for integrating young players. sitting Boeser for his first 2 games as a rookie is not a big deal. playing petey as a center took balls.

it was in other aspects, he was subpar.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,023
92,815
Vancouver, BC
Anyone else remember Green sitting Boeser for the first 2 games of the season during his rookie year? After all the excitement we had about him coming over. Lol

Yup.

Scored 4 goals in 9 games the previous year, absolutely lit up the preseason and was our best player ... and they scratch him so they can dress guys like Burmistrov/Granlund/Virtanen.

Was the most Travis Green thing he ever did.

green deserves some credit for integrating young players. sitting Boeser for his first 2 games as a rookie is not a big deal. playing petey as a center took balls.

it was in other aspects, he was subpar.

Travis Green was the worst coach I have ever seen at integrating young players. Nobody developed under him except Tyler Motte.
 

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
17,598
10,340
demko, hughes, horvat and ep40 all did fine under green. if green hurt the development of any other guys they didn't recover with other teams. the only young guy who improved after he left was dowd. you could maybe argue green hurt hoglander i guess.

it's actually a thing about green in his favour. when boudreau and tochett came in they didn't find neglected diamonds in the rough. they continued to develop guys who had been developing under green and the guys who had been flailing continued to flail.
 

Blue and Green

Out to lunch
Dec 17, 2017
4,002
4,216
I hope the Canucks don't lose Friedman. He is very important depth. I trust him much more than I trust any of the other AHL defenders, including Brannstrom (and Juulsen for that matter but I think the team expected he would be claimed if waived).
He's expendable. Juulsen functions as the 4th guy on the right side and I doubt that Friedman on the left side is any more capable than Brannstrom or Wolanin. This is the easiest move in terms of saving some cap space; they still have 13F and 7D on the roster.
 

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,118
13,828
Vancouver
demko, hughes, horvat and ep40 all did fine under green. if green hurt the development of any other guys they didn't recover with other teams. the only young guy who improved after he left was dowd. you could maybe argue green hurt hoglander i guess.

it's actually a thing about green in his favour. when boudreau and tochett came in they didn't find neglected diamonds in the rough. they continued to develop guys who had been developing under green and the guys who had been flailing continued to flail.
Horvat was the only real growth we’ve seen from a younger player under Green.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,528
6,411
Not me, i think the Hronek trade was pretty fair value at the time

Fans just had PTSD from Jim Benning

That's fine. The point remains that people often get worked up over "negotiation tactics." Like Yzerman didn't shop Hronek around and Allvin simply accepted Yzerman's demand without countering. I mean it's valid criticism but negotiations are often more nuanced. Part of it is trusting the person you're dealing with. A lot of times you just don't want to go 12 rounds with another GM. I think all else being equal, you want to be the GM that a team trusts to be easy to deal with. Part of the job of being a GM is having an accurate valuation of your own player's trade value around the league and know what another team might be looking for. In this case, Yzerman got what he wanted and Allvin got what he wanted for what you agree to be a pretty fair price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sting101

PavelBure10

The Russian Rocket
Aug 25, 2009
5,872
8,171
Okanagan
Friedman is a warrior. He takes a beating and keeps on trucking. Friedman sacrifices his body and his well being just as much as anyone in the league in order for his team to win. A true character guy and a complete team player. Friedman is a excellent depth defenseman and I really hope he clears. A great depth soldier for the Canucks
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,023
92,815
Vancouver, BC
demko, hughes, horvat and ep40 all did fine under green. if green hurt the development of any other guys they didn't recover with other teams. the only young guy who improved after he left was dowd. you could maybe argue green hurt hoglander i guess.

it's actually a thing about green in his favour. when boudreau and tochett came in they didn't find neglected diamonds in the rough. they continued to develop guys who had been developing under green and the guys who had been flailing continued to flail.

All of those guys came in as basically NHL-ready impact players and then regressed, same with Boeser. Horvat basically flatlined. Then all of them exploded after Green was fired.
 

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
17,598
10,340
All of those guys came in as basically NHL-ready impact players and then regressed, same with Boeser. Horvat basically flatlined. Then all of them exploded after Green was fired.

i forgot boeser. could any of their development delay issues be perhaps attributed to other things like covid or the team's overall quality, or can you state with any certainty that it was green?

because all i see is your subjective take that players who have since developed into the core of the team were harmed or held back by green but then perservered, as opposed to other causes or just natural career progression to explain their career arcs? how do you zero in on green?

otoh, can you refute my take that only one young player i can think of, dowd*, has played better since leaving the canucks after green? to me a hallmark of a bad coach is players who are held back by him and then leave and thrive elsewhere. you'd certainly expect to see some if he's the worst coach you've ever seen at integrating young players.

the absence of such players to me is a very strong indication green was not holding young player development back. it's one of many reasons i think the verdict is out on green as a coach. i don't think he's likely to be exceptional, but i think he may be a competent coach who was saddled here with badly built teams, an immature core, and the circumstances of covid.

* i will grant you gudbranson had that one goodish season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nick Lang

RobsonStreet

Registered User
Jun 4, 2004
765
349
i forgot boeser. could any of their development delay issues be perhaps attributed to other things like covid or the team's overall quality, or can you state with any certainty that it was green?

because all i see is your subjective take that players who have since developed into the core of the team were harmed or held back by green but then perservered, as opposed to other causes or just natural career progression to explain their career arcs? how do you zero in on green?

otoh, can you refute my take that only one young player i can think of, dowd*, has played better since leaving the canucks after green? to me a hallmark of a bad coach is players who are held back by him and then leave and thrive elsewhere. you'd certainly expect to see some if he's the worst coach you've ever seen at integrating young players.

the absence of such players to me is a very strong indication green was not holding young player development back. it's one of many reasons i think the verdict is out on green as a coach. i don't think he's likely to be exceptional, but i think he may be a competent coach who was saddled here with badly built teams, an immature core, and the circumstances of covid.

* i will grant you gudbranson had that one goodish season.
Sorry, but that’s a bad test. If a player’s development is wrecked by their situation, the odds become long that they will get a good opportunity elsewhere - they get passed by other prospects, that’s survivorship bias 101. Beyond that, there’s more variability when a player changes teams than when that same player has different coaches on the same team.

There is no pure test, but if a decent number of well regarded prospects underperform under one coach, and improve when he leaves and if this pattern happens in more than one stop, that’s about as good as we’re likely to get. We’ll see how it goes in Ottawa.
 

Billy Kvcmu

Registered User
Dec 5, 2014
28,604
17,387
West Vancouver
That's fine. The point remains that people often get worked up over "negotiation tactics." Like Yzerman didn't shop Hronek around and Allvin simply accepted Yzerman's demand without countering. I mean it's valid criticism but negotiations are often more nuanced. Part of it is trusting the person you're dealing with. A lot of times you just don't want to go 12 rounds with another GM. I think all else being equal, you want to be the GM that a team trusts to be easy to deal with. Part of the job of being a GM is having an accurate valuation of your own player's trade value around the league and know what another team might be looking for. In this case, Yzerman got what he wanted and Allvin got what he wanted for what you agree to be a pretty fair price.
Yzerman got what he wanted at the time

But when you look at their D core, Detroit sure can use Hronek and Wallman right night. Inetad they overpaid for Chiarot and Holl
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad