arttk
Registered User
I think getting lowballed like crazy is the bigger reasonPaul Bissonette influence lol wow
I think getting lowballed like crazy is the bigger reasonPaul Bissonette influence lol wow
Probably, but pretending like it was Biz talking to Aquillini while they were both taking a piss at the urinals is funnier.I think getting lowballed like crazy is the bigger reason
Why would Hughes who may be playing at his ceiling stay through a rebuild when he can go to a contender in 2 years.I'm not quite sure if I'm ready to accept a full rebuild but, if I were, I could make the argument.
Demko is 29! That seemed to happen overnight. Miller soon to be 32.
The only player I would hold on to for sure is Hughes.
Possibly hold on to Pettersson unless they can get a serious return for him.
Everyone else should be actively on the block. That includes Garland simply because he could likely fetch a decent return: Miller, Boeser, Garland, Joshua (only because he's already 28), Demko, Debrusk, and Hronek. For these players they should be able to get decent prospects + picks. Get what they can for Hoglander and Soucy.
The goal would be to emerge in 2.5 years for the 27/28 season with Hughes signed long term (hopefully he sees enough progress to sign but it is a risk). Pettersson will still be in his prime with term on his contract. All other contracts would have been dumped or have expired by then. OELs 2 highest buyout years will be behind them. Willander and Lekkerimaki will have had 2+ years to develop.
Worry not about winning for this and the next two seasons, achieving 3 top 10 picks, and operating well below the cap. Acquire as many prospects and picks during this period.
With ample cap space they would then be buyers in free agnecy in the summer of 27.
Easy peasy.
I doubt they want to tear it down though, like let's say they move Miller and even Boeser too. They''ll target young roster players back and futures, and I doubt they're just gonna sit out on those futures. They'll use the cap space and futures at either the TDL or draft week to trade for a player who can help now.Why would Hughes who may be playing at his ceiling stay through a rebuild when he can go to a contender in 2 years.
A conversation nobody wants to have. If you tear it down he should be the first asset you move.
I understand but what player do you anticipate them getting that will be as good as Miller and contribute as much before Quinns contract is over?I doubt they want to tear it down though, like let's say they move Miller and even Boeser too. They''ll target young roster players back and futures, and I doubt they're just gonna sit out on those futures. They'll use the cap space and futures at either the TDL or draft week to trade for a player who can help now.
It's more of a roster shuffle than a rebuild. Horvat to Hronek type of moves.
Probably right, but you have to try while you have a top 5 player in the league in his prime on your team. If they look bad/mid next year by the TDL as well, then the Hughes discussion gets more realistic and interesting to me.I understand but what player do you anticipate them getting that will be as good as Miller and contribute as much before Quinns contract is over?
The team is about to get much worse after they trade JT
Why not both! We are all CANUCKSThis trade deadline is going to either be the wildest one we’ve seen for us in years, or the most disappointing.
People need to chill, feels like if the team is not doing well, all the rebuild guys just comes out in full force.
Hard to after we got a taste of competence for 1 season in 10.People need to chill, feels like if the team is not doing well, all the rebuild guys just comes out in full force.
The 7th round pick in this deal always makes me laugh. Benning in a nutshell.
I think people have a hard time changing habits after a decade of Benning.
I think rebuild is only suitable when there is literally zero hope and I don't think we are anywhere close to that.Hard to after we got a taste of competence for 1 season in 10.
Loss to the Oilers
J.T. Miller
- Was a statement in the negative direction for the Canucks
- Tocchet has essentially pointed there next game against the Capitals as a must win
- Is ready to be traded and has signalled to the team that he’s ready to go
- Play on the ice signals that change is necessary
- Everyone in the league recognizes the friction, his age, money, and term
- Teams see the drop off in his play
- Plenty of teams, beyond the Rangers, have stepped up
- Hurricanes have been working incredibly hard; have presented a few different potential opportunities for the Canucks; haven’t got it over the finish line
- Outside of the Rangers, “no one has done more work, on the Miller file, than the Carolina Hurricanes”
- Does not think he will be Canucks by February 1st; thinks the Canucks have to pull the band-aid off
- Canucks are 10 good days away from having a chance at locking down a wild card spot and don’t waste a Hughes MVP season
Tocchet was great for us last season but I don't think he is that unreplaceable. Yeah a new coach might not run the D system as tight as Tocchet but we'll probably end up with something less offensively stifling.It will not be a true Canucks timeline until Rutherford and Tocchet both depart in the summer and we're left with Nonis 2.0 Allvin running everything.