Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Christmas Presents

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,341
3,187
Drury too. Rangers have now fallen out of a playoff spot. Problem for the Canucks, they don’t really have any win-now assets to give up beyond Hoglander unless a massive franchise altering trade is made.

If Hoglander has appeal I don't think it's as a win now asset. He's more of a medium term bet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bossram and Vector

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
28,504
49,318
Junktown
If Hoglander has appeal I don't think it's as a win now asset. He's more of a medium term bet.

That’s fair. I more meant he’s not a pure future asset like a draft pick or prospect. Hoglander won’t help turn the Sabres or Rangers season around but would at least be in the line-up the next night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ernie

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
39,098
8,081
Montreal, Quebec
Oh come on - we're really blaming Petey's poor play on our defenseman? This is a new hot (and bad) take

Actually, yes. Someone over on r/canucks looked up the data and showcased just how little Pettersson plays with Hughes relative to their respective skill levels.

I highly recommend reading both their posts but the gist is Pettersson still has a 50.81%xGF away from Hughes while everyone else is at 40.73%xGF overall. In other words, Miller, Boeser and DeBrusk rely far more on Hughes than Pettersson does.

Put simply, getting a legitimate puck moving defenseman would do a world of good not just for Pettersson but the team as a whole because we wouldn't have to rely on Hughes for damn near everything.

That's the fundamental problem right now, and teams recognize it. Which is why they try boxing out Hughes more than any other player. You shut him down and it shuts us down.
 
Last edited:

David71

Registered User
Dec 27, 2008
17,933
1,931
vancouver
The amount of people who want to be annual sellers when we're a contender to make the playoffs is concerning.

We play to win, remember? Or has it been so long that all you know is Benning.

Who cares about 3rd round picks, I want to win the cup and you do that by taking big swings while you have the best defenseman in the league who is probably a top 5 player overall for 3 more years, two top 10~ 100pt Cs, and a top 5 goalie.

I will drive as many Sawyer Mynios and Hunter Brzustewiczs to the airport as I possibly can to see the team win playoff games.
risky doing that. trading picks like candy and in a few years us fans will bitch and moan oh wow we havent drafted a good defenseman since quinn hughes 2017. wat if lerkermaki is on the table for short term help then what? rinse and repeat again. the core will get older. miller boeser petey. canucks are in a lose lose situation tbh
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,683
5,607
risky doing that. trading picks like candy and in a few years us fans will bitch and moan oh wow we havent drafted a good defenseman since quinn hughes 2017. wat if lerkermaki is on the table for short term help then what? rinse and repeat again. the core will get older. miller boeser petey. canucks are in a lose lose situation tbh

Sure, that's how competing works, but I'd rather go for it than watch Hughes leave as a UFA, and Miller age out.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
23,008
16,509
Sure, that's how competing works, but I'd rather go for it than watch Hughes leave as a UFA, and Miller age out.
Competing for what? As Burkie used to say, you'd have to be in some drug-induced fantasy to think this team is a Cup contender.

And guys like Miller, Demko and Boeser 'will' age out long before that happens anyway. You don't win a Cup with just star players. It's 'depth' that always spells the difference. And this team really doesn't have any.
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,683
5,607
Competing for what? As Burkie used to say, you'd have to be in some drug-induced fantasy to think this team is a Cup contender.

And guys like Miller, Demko and Boeser 'will' age out long before that happens anyway. You don't win a Cup with just star players. It's 'depth' that always spells the difference. And this team really doesn't have any.

Great, find some depth.

I'd rather the team actually try to win the cup while they have the best defenseman on the planet making half his expected value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Josepho

Josepho

i want the bartkowski thread back
Jan 1, 2015
15,144
8,978
British Columbia
Great, find some depth.

I'd rather the team actually try to win the cup while they have the best defenseman on the planet making half his expected value.
You are way more likely to acquire a Hampus Lindholm or something with the 17th overall pick than you are to select a good player that actually lines up with this team's competitive window. I hate this idea that if there isn't an obvious move to bolster this team, we have to give up.
 

Bgav

We Stylin'
Sponsor
Sep 3, 2009
24,538
6,462
Vancouver
If Cozens and Byram are the two players they're targeting, there better be a first round pick attached to that package.
 

SeawaterOnIce

Bald is back in style.
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2011
18,209
23,085
I hate the idea of trading Petey. At his best he’s an outstanding player. And I feel like there’s no scenario where we win a trade involving him.

This franchise needed him to excel and be a perennial 100 pt player to offset the deficiencies elsewhere (ie. on the blueline).

In any other market like CBJ or Carolina, this is probably a non-story and he probably rides out his contract.

We will undoubtedly lose in any trade involving him. People raise a stink about his compete level but Cozens and Tage are legitimate sloths at times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: credulous

Nuckles

_________
Apr 27, 2010
29,052
5,815
heck
Cozens is in his 5th NHL season, is turning 24 soon, has had ONE season over 50 points and 20 goals (2 years ago, was 5th on his team in points with 68), and is on pace for his least productive season (34 points) since his rookie year. Oh yeah, he's also signed to a terrible contract until 2030.

I'll pass on him unless Buffalo is adding a ton of value to unload that contract in a Pettersson trade.
 

thecupismine

Registered User
Apr 1, 2007
2,822
2,404
Actually, yes. Someone over on r/canucks looked up the data and showcased just how little Pettersson plays with Hughes relative to their respective skill levels.

I highly recommend reading both their posts but the gist is Pettersson still has a 50.81%xGF away from Hughes while everyone else is at 40.73%xGF overall. In other words, Miller, Boeser and DeBrusk rely far more on Hughes than Pettersson does.

Put simply, getting a legitimate puck moving defenseman would do a world of good not just for Pettersson but the team as a whole because we wouldn't have to rely on Hughes for damn near everything.

That's the fundamental problem right now, and teams recognize it. Which is why they try boxing out Hughes more than any other player. You shut him down and it shuts us down.

Yup, they can play 15 minutes a game without a competent puck mover, but trying to do it for 35 minutes is a recipe for disaster. Elite with Hughes out there, contender for 1st overall pick without him.

Cole & Zadorov were still below average puck movers (on average, Z could be great some games), but there's still a big drop off between them and Soucy/Myers, and another level for the bottom pairing guys.

The team will do 90% of things right, then undo all of it with one stupid icing/pass off the boards/etc. It's frustrating to watch because the mistake is obvious, while all the correct things they're doing get ignored afterwards because of that one mistake. Forwards are being chopped off at the knees with the current situation.

The bull case is the team is a sleeping giant that gets unlocked with one more puck moving guy and other moves around the edges. The bear case is something is off with the locker room that’s leading to these inconsistent efforts, and only management really knows the answer to that.
 

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,452
14,419
Vancouver
Tage + Byram would be a great move as well
Trust me, if you think Petey is frustrating, wait until you watch Tage.

He’s a very low IQ, one dimensional soft center. Guys like him, Zibanejad, and Kyrou I want far away from this team.

Cozens is in his 5th NHL season, is turning 24 soon, has had ONE season over 50 points and 20 goals (2 years ago, was 5th on his team in points with 68), and is on pace for his least productive season (34 points) since his rookie year. Oh yeah, he's also signed to a terrible contract until 2030.

I'll pass on him unless Buffalo is adding a ton of value to unload that contract in a Pettersson trade.
He also, surprise surprise with these Buffalo guys, low hockey sense and is a brutal center at the NHL level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nuckles

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad