swiftwin
★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
- Jul 26, 2005
- 24,233
- 13,950
It's painfully obvious that we're up against the cap because of the long term contracts we've given to our young core players, which is HUGELY different from being up against the cap because we piled up on overpaid veterans.It's very unusual for rebuilding teams to start trading 1sts and be right up against the cap before actually turning the corner into a playoff team. And it puts them in a tough place, because more assets are going to have to be jettisoned to supplement the existing core without taking on salary. They likely have to trade for a goalie this offseason, and probably some help for a thin bottom-6. Both of those additions will have to have small cap hits, but also be impact players. That will cost significant pick/prospect capital.
There's a bit more flexibility if Debrincat is traded, but that also opens up a hole in the top-6.
By giving long term contracts at higher AAV instead of shorter bridge contracts at lower AAV, we're getting young players that are slightly overpaid right now, with the expectation that they'll be underpaid in the later years of their contract when we're expected to be at the peak of our contention window.
We'll have amazing cap flexibility starting in 2025, with many core pieces already locked in place.