Lindberg
Bennyflyers16 get a life
- Oct 5, 2013
- 7,170
- 7,894
Finally watched it instead of relying on what you guys said here. Referenced Tampa Bay specifically as a model team.
I'm confused. What is wrong with Tampa?
Finally watched it instead of relying on what you guys said here. Referenced Tampa Bay specifically as a model team.
Q is not coming in as a "consultant." Why would he bother? The Flyers may not be his first choice, or even his third choice. We just don't know.
If the kids in LHV can't make the Phantoms a top team in the AHL, they're not going to move the needle here.
So it comes down to a judgment call, will they develop faster in the AHL or NHL. And no, there is no one on this board who has a clue which is the better development strategy.
My personal thoughts are they are probably better in the AHL (except maybe NAK) for a couple more months, Rubtsov and Kase were the most impressive, but Rubtsov is hurt and Kase dinged up coming off a shoulder injury, so forget those two. Myers and Friedman certainly wouldn't be hurt by more seasoning, same with Vorobyev, who may not be a good fit anyway, given his lack of speed on a team that wants to get faster. Even NAK might be helped by playing a bigger offensive role (and polishing his skills) than he'd see in Philly.
Hakstol makes it easier to evaluate players, since they're in a scheme they know. And you have years of film on them in that scheme.
Put a new coach in with a new scheme and suddenly you don't know if a player is struggling due to talent or trying to figure out the new scheme.
And since that new coach will be gone by summer, you'll just be wasting half a year.
The real problem is making changes mid-season, unless you have an assistant/AHL coach you've been grooming as a replacement, an interim coach isn't going to help. Pittsburgh had Sullivan in the AHL for years, and he knew many of the players on the roster, and they had played his scheme, and they promoted three of his AHL players and added a D-man (Schultz) who was a good fit. That was a relatively seamless transition, while he was hired as the head coach, not a lame duck interim coach.
If the Flyers wanted to do that with Knob, he should have been sent to LHV, and Gordon brought to Philly as an assistant coach.
In fact, even if they hire a new HC this summer, I want Knob or someone like him at LHV, running the same scheme as Philly, bonding with the prospects and learning the ropes, so if the Flyers have to go through this again, they're prepared to make a HC change.
I want him fired now too.
I want Simmonds gone so there isn't the possibility of him being re-signed.
Curious question....which person can fire Scott? I hate him because he is a bourgeois capitalist who thinks global warming is natural. Hope your mega house at the shore is under water in a few years.
Because his presence in the organization is no longer acceptable.
Not a faith thing. He’s a vezina winner. A flexibility thing. If you go with a higher value contract contingent on no movement restrictions, maybe it’s something that would be considered on both sides.If you got to justify a big signing by bringing up the possibility of exposing the said player in the expansion draft. You should probably just skip out on signing the player in the first place as you’re admitting you don’t have much faith in the signing.
Finally watched it instead of relying on what you guys said here. Referenced Tampa Bay specifically as a model team.
I'm confused. What is wrong with Tampa?
Sure, but firing Hakstol is hardly irrelevant. It is a must. It also puts any complacent players on alert.
It signals to the word in general that failure is not to be tolerated. Continued employment of Hakstol says that failure is tolerated. Likewise for Lappy.
Especially when your backside gets penetrated to the tune of 6-0, 7-1 scores, things like that.
(☞゚ヮ゚)☞
Is that some kind of advanced statistic?
Check. Check. Check. Check.
If its okey i would go after Tarasenko with Voracek.
Get rid of Simmonds.
Defense needs also righty with size like Manson / Parayko / Larsson, if not possible to have righties lets go for Nurse / Zadorov.
I'd take Tank over Voracek, probably Panarin as well. I doubt we get Parayko. Maybe Nurse
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ᕦ(Ò_Óˇ)ᕤ
After training camp, iirc. But very quickly. They liked his whole commitment to fitness and what have you, they brought in a trainer that was very similar to him in how like, insanely stringent he is/was with diet and off-ice workouts. Management wanted that to be the culture of a team that was lacking a real identity.
Philly used to be a forsure thing for coaches,players everything but not now.A lot of these ideas to fix the Flyers approach it from a video game-like perspective.
Trading for high talent guys without suggesting which high talent guy would go the other way.
Assuming you can just hire a coach, not that he might prefer other teams.
Assuming your speculative coach hire will be able to persuade a free agent who used to play for him but was traded away; having no real knowledge of their personal relationship; & ignoring reports Panarin is interested in a beach climate.
Friedman flat out said that z had a clause in his contract he would be given C when he signed with broons.Talking about Chara getting the C in Boston.
If Voracek frustrates you, current Tarasenko will too. I don't follow the Blues closely enough to tell you why, but he's not the guy you hope he would be these days.
still 4 feet closer than G and Jake