GDT: [GM 19] Vancouver Canucks vs. Vegas Golden Knights | Nov 21 | 7:30PM PST | SNET

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Honest question...is Rathbone worse defensively than Stillman? What does he do that Rathbone can't. Just flabbergasted at this stupid decision. Stillman+Myers paring costs us a minimum of 1 extra goal against a game. I know Myers won't be scratched no matter how terrible he plays because he's really tall and gets paid a lot.

I can see Burroughs leaving as UFA after this unjust treatment.

Objectively, what am I missing here?

Stillman should be the 3rd option to fill the last D spot. Common sense would dictate:- 1)Burroughs 2)Rathbone 3)Stillman (prefer our AHL D over him)
You can't play Rathbone with Myers. And BB doesn't want 2 righties on the 3rd pair. Again, probably because you can't trust a guy playing on his off side paired with Myers.

There's a common element somewhere in there, but I can't quite place it...
 
i don't really mind trading picks/prospects but two years of minor cap space, stillman, dermott, bear and studnicka is a really poor return for the picks and players (myrenberg, not dickinson) sent out
 
As I said in my previous post..Stillman is more of a liability than Burroughs, and if i was the coach, I'd put in Burroughs in , and Stillman out....Although, I'm not losing my shit over a decision over which 3rd pairing D man in the lineup...Whats more important are how the core players perform.

As for Rathbone, he last played against the Habs...and he didnt look good on a couple of goals against if I recall...Although, in his defence, the entire team was a no show that night.

This isn't a below average 3rd pairing D going over a good or average one. This is an AHL level D that gets lit up playing sheltered minutes. Stillman is on for twice the amount of goals an average pairing D should. That's not negligible. 6 D isn't really a big deal as long as they aren't hurting you. Stillman is. That means the core has to do even more to win

Also Demko is part of the core as well. Putting Stillman on the ice means more 2 on 1s, missed assignments and giveaways for Demko to have to deal with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sting101 and Peen
Stillman - Burroughs is the 2022 Gudbranson - Biega/Stanton

Except that Burroughs is far superior to Biega and Stanton meaning the gap is much larger. And it’s not as if this organization has some massive contract commitment to Stillman either. So weird.
 
Stillman - Burroughs is the 2022 Gudbranson - Biega/Stanton

Except that Burroughs is far superior to Biega and Stanton meaning the gap is much larger. And it’s not as if this organization has some massive contract commitment to Stillman either. So weird.
Exactly. Very bizarre situation.
 
Stillman - Burroughs is the 2022 Gudbranson - Biega/Stanton

Except that Burroughs is far superior to Biega and Stanton meaning the gap is much larger. And it’s not as if this organization has some massive contract commitment to Stillman either. So weird.

Stillman is a few levels of bad higher than Gudbranson as well.

It should be very telling that AHLers like Brisebois and Juulsen have done better in similar roles for their short stints and looked better than Stillman
 
There’s nothing like meaningful games in November.

WE ARE BETTER!!!
 
Stillman is a few levels of bad higher than Gudbranson as well.

It should be very telling that AHLers like Brisebois and Juulsen have done better in similar roles for their short stints and looked better than Stillman
iirc our call-ups looked better than gudbranson as well
 
Hoping Boeser just started a scoring streak.

Still with STILLMAN? :help:
Vegas is a heavy team. Maybe they should drop Dries, and dress 7 D tonight.

GO DEMKO !!!
 
I'm hoping that Demko is a wall tonight, and gets into the heads of the Vegas Knights players. Just like he did for the bubble playoffs.

Demko is going to have to be good to have a chance in this one.

Go Canucks...
 
Burroughs actually playing like an effective top 4 D and he's in the pressbox because reasons.

At least try to have meritocracy. Thought this bullshit would've been over with when Green + previous management got canned but clearly not.

I mean it has to be disheartening as a player. Easy to be confused and double guess yourself as you eventually get back in because you don't know why you're getting the bench.
 
  • Like
Reactions: quat and MS
This isn't a below average 3rd pairing D going over a good or average one. This is an AHL level D that gets lit up playing sheltered minutes. Stillman is on for twice the amount of goals an average pairing D should. That's not negligible. 6 D isn't really a big deal as long as they aren't hurting you. Stillman is. That means the core has to do even more to win

Also Demko is part of the core as well. Putting Stillman on the ice means more 2 on 1s, missed assignments and giveaways for Demko to have to deal with.
There is no justification for playing Stillman over Burroughs. This is a black mark on BB's coaching career and he should be embarrassed and shamed for it.
Watching Burroughs progress the more games he played was a real pleasure for this long suffering fan base, as small a step forward it may have been. Dumping him from the roster for the likes of Myers and Stillman is just gross.
 
  • Like
Reactions: racerjoe and MS
Burroughs sits

Stillman plays

Accountability at its best

Team flukes out 2 wins and Stillman is now a regular. Unbelievable

PA is clearly dictating the lineup to justify his horrific incompetence
 
  • Like
Reactions: dez
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad