BuiumSaveUs
Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
- May 2, 2018
- 19,150
- 12,071
If you can find someone to give you a future first and a blue chip forward prospect for 20-40 games of past prime Giroux, I’ll be very suprisedBoldy + '23 1st?
If you can find someone to give you a future first and a blue chip forward prospect for 20-40 games of past prime Giroux, I’ll be very suprisedBoldy + '23 1st?
Dis you, homie? For a guy who seems super sensitive and concerned with other people's civility, you sure like to stir the pot.How about next time you come into a thread and be civil instead of being a dick! It's a fact there's not been one single rumors attaching fletcher to any wild players since you left. You , nor I know if there is any rule in place why it's not happening. People like you aren't worth responding to
Yeah, you are the dumb one. Don't sit here calling me dumb because you are beyond ignorant and ass
Bush league is another word for the type of player gabriel l is. The fact Colorado fans are blind to this proves it
This is so blatantly false and ignorant. You comment on everything Canucks, yet you aren't a Canucks fan? Goid thing your opinion doesn't mean Jack squat on Calen addison.
Not for a 34 year old rental, IMO. For an extended Hertl, or JT Miller? Sure.Would the Wild really want to go that in? Are they in a position to start dealing 1sts? Honest question.
With how Boldy has looked, I think you could debate if he or Rossi has more value at the moment. Wild fans pretty quickly turned down the inclusion of Rossi in any G deal, I would assume the same would be true of Boldy.Boldy + '23 1st?
Would the Wild really want to go that in? Are they in a position to start dealing 1sts? Honest question.
Boldy + '23 1st?
A rental isn't worth this muchMarat, Hunt, and a 2nd
I'm not convinced you know who Claude Giroux is.....
Your opinion is certainly not consensus though. But sure the split but there is certainty a segment willing to give up a first for the hertl, girioux and pavelski class of playersNot for a 34 year old rental, IMO. For an extended Hertl, or JT Miller? Sure.
I said not for a rental. Hertl can be extended. Miller has another year on his contract. I wouldn't trade a first for Giroux or Pavelski but crappier teams have given up more for worse players. Guerin doesn't like rentals and if he trades for a "center", it might as well be for an actual center, not just a winger who takes faceoffs.Your opinion is certainly not consensus though. But sure the split but there is certainty a segment willing to give up a first for the hertl, girioux and pavelski class of players
Do you think giroux won't outproduce hertl and miller over the next few years? Thinking of g exclusively as a rental has you seriously undervaluing him.I said not for a rental. Hertl can be extended. Miller has another year on his contract. I wouldn't trade a first for Giroux or Pavelski but crappier teams have given up more for worse players. Guerin doesn't like rentals and if he trades for a "center", it might as well be for an actual center, not just a winger who takes faceoffs.
If you disagree with my post, you can just reply to the person asking the question and provide your own opinion. You don't need to tell me it's just my opinion, Lebowski. I already know. Hence "IMO". It means In My Opinion.
Can one of those + be Marco Rossi?
Khus seems like a good starting point. I agree you cant trade Rossi for a rental, deal makes sense for him to go to Minny. Khus + what to get it done.If that is the ask we would be walking away. Marat can be had but Rossi is in Minnesota next year for sure. We can’t give him up for a rental.
i would assume its Khus + 22 1st to get him here.Khus seems like a good starting point. I agree you cant trade Rossi for a rental, deal makes sense for him to go to Minny. Khus + what to get it done.
I feel like he’d be fine leaving the bottom feeding Philly team for a chance at a deep playoff run with MN?Giroux has a NMC. Not sure I see him waiting for the wild but who knows. He may not waive at all.
This.A rental isn't worth this much
This.
Love Giroux, but he’s 34 year old rental. Can’t be worth anything more than one good spec and a 2nd. 3 years ago he’s probably worth that, and more.
how about something around:
To MIN: Giroux (retained), Seeler
To PHI: Greenway, Rask, 2022--1st, 2023--2nd
That's definitely what I think. Hertl and Miller are better than him now. Why wouldn't that be the case going forward? Giroux is 6 years older than those guysDo you think giroux won't outproduce hertl and miller over the next few years? Thinking of g exclusively as a rental has you seriously undervaluing him.
Giroux has played center this year and has excelled there previously.
True, about as good as it gets for a rental. Still would be tough to justify for MN right now. A big all or nothing type of moveAge is irrelevant if you're talking rental - and he's an outstanding rental.