GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 193,046
- 43,527
How many people are confident Frost will be a top 6 guy? He has that potential, but that is a high bar for any young player to clear. To me, nothing Tippett does looks easy. His hands aren't very soft. He has no touch on his passes. They are often a tick late and/or in a tough spot for his teammate to handle. Nothing about his passing is natural. That's kind of a non-negotiable for a top 6 player. Yeah he ripped a puck off the post last night, but it was from a relatively poor angle/distance and he didn't even sell the pass for a split second. There was no doubt he was shooting that puck.
I don't think you can say the same about Frost. There have been times this year where he doesn't look sure of himself, no doubt, and he's been inconsistent, but I think given how he has looked at other levels in the past, this is a case of adjusting to the highest level of hockey (on a bad team).
Tippet didn't miss all of last season and has ~40 more NHL games under his belt.
It’s nice that Laughton arguments can just be copy pasted.Best case to me is Tippett is the type of guy who squeaks out a few middle 6-productive box score seasons on a mediocre team. Because he does have physical tools. But probably with little consistency about his production long-term, and probably with less than rosy underlying numbers. If you give a somewhat talented player a consistent top 6-9 role and PP time with good players, logic simply dictates they will produce something. The question if that something is actually a net positive. I'm skeptical -- simply watched too much of him to be wowed by him hitting some posts for the first time. I know Chuck Fletcher gets off to guys ripping pucks.
My crystal ball tells me his future scoring role usage likely could just be replaced by someone more impactful (Brink, Allison, an unknown).......but won't be replaced by someone more impactful. The Flyers will double down and write his usage in stone to self-justify, as they always do. They didn't take him as a buy low gamble; they took a flawed player, who hasn't settled in the NHL, to be part of their young core. Spin it how you want, but the usage he will be gifted is pricey.
laughton wasnt aquired in a trade! More like Ristolainen getting PP Time since it was clear they will re-sign him! Cause now they must show how good the player RLY is and why they pay him 5.x ......!!!It’s nice that Laughton arguments can just be copy pasted.
Saves time.
The app never lies!!Zito wins a Cup and Chuck's 1st rounder two years down the road is 32nd overall. You just have to laugh.
Zito wins a Cup and Chuck's 1st rounder two years down the road is 32nd overall. You just have to laugh.
I feel like this is the one major league still able to be picked apart by a progressive GM just dumpster diving for net positive players because they don't fall within some dino archetype some of these GMs still abide by.The funniest part of this to me is all the talk about how you have to pay through the nose for vet Defensemen justifying four major trades here and the guy they could have hired built an entire Cup winning corps out of Ekblad's corpse and odds and ends you could find in a bird's nest.
Deadhead had that thing earmarked for a lottery pick a few years ago.
Chuck Fletcher, Joe Sakic, and Bill Zito.Zito wins a Cup and Chuck's 1st rounder two years down the road is 32nd overall. You just have to laugh.
Zito wins a Cup and Chuck's 1st rounder two years down the road is 32nd overall. You just have to laugh.
Sneak peakI can’t wait to hear what Chuckles thinks……this Friday on Sportsnet.
There's been a lot of gifs posted on this site over the years, both original and retreads. This may be my favorite.
Harry Dalton of the Brewers tried to talk Zito into being a baseball scout for them years ago after he failed as a baseball player. Zito had been a bat boy for Milwaukee at one time. Zito liked hockey more than baseball. Good career choice.Chuck Fletcher, Joe Sakic, and Bill Zito.
They’re all the same.
16 of them were to Holmgren and Clarke
Oh please, let's not have ChucklesTheSadClown on the the Sportsnet broadcast of the draft again.Tippett, Barkey AND the last pick in the 1st rd this year.
Can't wait to hear Chuck talk this up in a few days.
Giroux should already be a lock... only reason he is not is the crazy low scoring era across his prime. Vs 5 guys from the era before who all got in.Roenick getting in the HoF is good news for Giroux's eventual chances. They should have similar point totals if G plays another 2-3 seasons at a high level.