Okay, but that's not what he said. He literally said to rake the california 'forests' to stop wildfires, not to use heavy industrial machinery to proactively clean combustible material from forest floors, which is 75% of Finland. I'm not thinking LA is quite apples-to-apples in forestry.
Windmills cause cancer is a direct quote. Good luck going on defending that one.
Nuke the hurricane, cool, even if I grant you that one, we've known for 50 years that doesn't work--I can appreciate someone who doesn't know just questioning everything, but I also expect the leader of the free world to have a basic grasp on high school level science (and that's being generous) so as not to waste everyone's time. But ok, no harm in questioning.
The point is that words have meaning at face value too and if you have to spend 24 hours translating and researching things to make an explanation on someone's behalf then there's an issue.
There was a spike in people ingesting cleaning products in the country last night, (example,
NYC Doubled in calls). Surprise, surprise. Now is that one part natural selection? Yes, like the AZ story. But there's a reason it's important to have a clear, direct message when you're addressing the nation.
Is he trolling the press because he can? Yeah, to some degree, probably. Is the press coverage a concern as well? Yes, absolutely. But both things can be true and this insane blind adherance to either isn't helpful.
There's a reason that states independently of the central government are finding success and if you watch any of their press conferences--even those you vociferously disagree with--you'll find clear direct actionable messages and plans. THAT should be the bar, not "yeah but if you read what his advisors said beforehand and research after the speech you'll find that
maybe a study conducted 50 years ago jives with what he hurriedly passed off as a question and later deemed sarcasm."
I'll hold anyone to this bar, not just "orange man bad." And I don't feel like asking the most powerful office in the world to hold together speeches better than a secondary school student is unfair.