The Mars Volchenkov
Registered User
If they win one of their last two games they should get in.reidy said:So what does this mean for us to advance?
If they win one of their last two games they should get in.reidy said:So what does this mean for us to advance?
btn said:A point would have been nice.
So Russia and Sweden left to go. Need to get at least 1 point out of those two to advance IMO.
sabresrat said:There are times to whine about officiating, but this is not one. JD was wrong, the linesman was right.
Even if he wasn't, it was just a hold in, not a goal.
Schneider held the puck in by knocking it down with his hand, then HE went and got it, none of the other US players touched it before he did. Linesman called it a hand pass, so the faceoff went outside the zone. US had to put DiPietro back in, then they were never really able to get the puck back in. Before that, the US had the puck in the zone, had possession of it, and were getting good chances to tie it up.sabresrat said:There are times to whine about officiating, but this is not one. JD was wrong, the linesman was right.
Even if he wasn't, it was just a hold in, not a goal.
GPF said:Beat Sweden and everything will be okay !!!!
Two straight shutouts, pretty solid.acr said:There's no way we don't advance to the tournament. We'll get at least a point against one of the next two(probably Russia, they don't look solid)
acr said:No, the linesman WAS wrong. Schneider knocked it down with the glove, two US forwards were standing there, visibly not playing the puck just so there wouldn't be a whistle, Schneider comes back into the play, touches the puck(LEGAL) and the linesman blows the whistle. The fact two US forwards were there trying to clear the way shows that it was a terrible call and should not have been just an honest mistake.
DevilsFan38 said:Schneider held the puck in by knocking it down with his hand, then HE went and got it, none of the other US players touched it before he did. Linesman called it a hand pass, so the faceoff went outside the zone. US had to put DiPietro back in, then they were never really able to get the puck back in. Before that, the US had the puck in the zone, had possession of it, and were getting good chances to tie it up.
Of course we can't know if they would have tied it up, but it was still a terrible call.
3 goals = chili said:is our best oppurtunity to get a point the Russians....they dont seem to have the Defensive presence that the Slovaks do
unfortunately with Forsberg coming back i think its going to be tough to get a point from the Swedes...
Fan-of-#9 said:Too much Gomez and Gionta IMO for the US. Modano was flying today and should have gotten more shifts. (From what I saw)
Fan-of-#9 said:Too much Gomez and Gionta IMO for the US. Modano was flying today and should have gotten more shifts. (From what I saw)
acr said:There's no way we don't advance to the tournament. We'll get at least a point against one of the next two(probably Russia, they don't look solid)
Ott = Snott said:Modano was flying but his puck control was way off. He also caused some unneccary turnovers. He was great defensively I thought..
Rolston was probably US' best player.. or at least the most dangerous one. I liked Blake as well for the few minutes he saw.
Ott = Snott said:Modano was flying but his puck control was way off. He also caused some unneccary turnovers. He was great defensively I thought..
Rolston was probably US' best player.. or at least the most dangerous one. I liked Blake as well for the few minutes he saw.
sabresrat said:If you need more evidence that Erik Cole is a product of Eric Staal, I think you just need to look at these Olympics.