joshjull
Registered User
Caniacforever said:You work with the players that you're given. If Laviolette would have rejected a lot of the slower, but more dedicated, Team USA members he would have been laughed at by Waddell and anybody else on the Team USA committee. You don't just turn your back on players that have given you a lot of good mileage over the years, unless they totally punk themselves out like Jeremy Roenick.
Do you honestly think Chris Chelios still deserves to be on Team USA by merit alone? I'd think not. He has, however, given a great deal to this country through his service and that much could not be overlooked.
Laviolette is simply trying to run the same system he has in Carolina, and he doesn't have the personelle to do it. Is that a coaching mistake? Probably. However, I think it's more of an indication that our talent level is dwindling and we're in a lull right now between a lot of REALLY good american players who are too young to play and the old regime that is on the way out. Canada has the luxary of having a team full of great players in their prime for every olympic year, we don't have that same luxary.
I'm not attacking Lavy just the way team USA was chosen. What was the philosophy when Waddell picked the team? I originally thought they were going young to give guys some experience and get ready for Vancouver. Then they pick many older players. Why? I'm not going to go through every player but there are a few younger players not chosen that will probably be on the 2010 team. Why not get them some experience.
Last edited: