joe_shannon_1983*
Guest
Pathfinder said:Thank goodness I'll be "on the road" and unable to to read the boards tomorrow
Why do you say that?
I mean, this thread is going to be a ball tomorrow!
Fire? Meet gasoline!
Pathfinder said:Thank goodness I'll be "on the road" and unable to to read the boards tomorrow
Pretty good analysis right there.Whichever team gives up the initiative to the other tomorrow is toast, and one of them will. If Russia allows Canada to spend signigicant time in its zone, hitting, banging and cycling, we're done. We'll take a few penalties when we get lazy/tired, Canada will jam the net, get a few bounces, it will be too hard to come back.
On the other hand if Canada relents or we are disciplined enough and work hard enough in our zone, once our forwards hit their stride, Canadian D just cannot shut them down consistently.
There's really no middle ground, at least I don't see it. Russia and Canada have the only two forward corps whom nobody can really stop when they are operating at 100%. So whoever will be the aggressor tomorrow, will win, and probably win big. If both teams are on, it will be a titanic battle. Russia has more talent, if we can match Canada's work ethic tomorrow, we'll win.
Gotta stay out of the penalty box...
Danny__K said:russia vs canada in the quarters whoda thunk it
HotToddy said:If Russia took their best 20 players, worked them in a boot camp like atmosphere for 4 years and entered them into a tournament with the best AHLer's and has-beens Canada and the rest of the world had to offer, I'd give them a chance. Oh wait.... those days are over.
Canada in best on best tournaments is 7 for 10. Russia is 1 for 10. All the luck tommorow, while you have an impressive and talented squad history is not on your side.
Pathfinder said:Crappy is definately not the correct term for the Canadian Navy. Small, would be more descriptive, and perhaps that's what you meant, but crappy it is not. And as to the size, it is what our politicians, and therefore the voters, want it to be.
octopi said:It sucks that one of them will not be playing for a medal.
I think Canada wins this. Even thought they have lost some questionble games, they have kept their GAA low. On the other hand, Russia has allowed 5 GAA by Slovakia and 4 by USA. I said from the start tRussia forwards can skate with anyone, but they aren't very experienced and their D leaves something to be desired.
Cyclops II said:Russia and Canada are the 2 most talented teams and the winner should win Gold unless the winner gets a subpar goaltending performance in the semi or final.
AvsGuy said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but the last umpteen times Canada and Russia met, Russia did not have Alexander Ovechkin or Evgeni Malkin on the team. That makes a world of difference, and I don't think Canada will overcome that.
octopi said:It sucks that one of them will not be playing for a medal.
I think Canada wins this. Even thought they have lost some questionble games, they have kept their GAA low. On the other hand, Russia has allowed 5 GAA by Slovakia and 4 by USA. I said from the start tRussia forwards can skate with anyone, but they aren't very experienced and their D leaves something to be desired.
roccol said:Did you carelessly for get to mention that Russia only gave up 2 goals in the other 3 games?
roccol said:Did you carelessly for get to mention that Russia only gave up 2 goals in the other 3 games?
Garbs said:They both played at the World Championships.
Canada won 4-3.
Den said:Only 11 of this Russian team participated in 2005 WC. Nabokov didn't. Plus, Canada doesn't have Hanu Henriksson on their roster this time around
Your elite referee didGarbs said:And you think all of Canada's elite showed up?
trippyime said:
I like the way you referred to Canada as a naval vessel. "She is done for".
Sorry, I just find that ironic given how crappy the Canadian "navy" is.