BobCole
Registered User
- May 21, 2014
- 1,790
- 1,533
I understand the hesitancy to commit to him long-term this offeason. But I think some of those guys are more moveable than you make them out to be. Rakell, for one, is moveable, IMHO. Smith is, too, regardless of whether he just got here. If we're committing to "the suck," then there's nothing stopping us from trading EK and retaining on him - his NMC isn't terribly restrictive.The alternative is what? Signing him to a deal that makes the return even worse in two years when Sid says f*** playing for a bottom feeder and hangs 'em up?
The team sucks ass right now. The team's no longer a Cup contender, and imo, hasn't been for years. It makes no sense to re-sign Jake, and letting him walk is an unforced error. So, you trade him and that's that. Rust has a NMC. Rakell's not a guy anybody's gonna care about. Smith just got picked up. Petts is the only blueline who can play any kind of a defensive game. Karlsson's still got his NMC iirc so that coupled with his cap hit means this team's getting shit back. /shrug
Jake's fine. He's a smart player who has chemistry with Sid and Geno. But he's the one valuable asset this team's got to either make a hockey trade to keep up the masquerade that they're contenders, or to try and reduce the pain of the impending rebuild by trying to load up on futures.
-edit- Some other words.
Again, the one thing I fully understand is that moving Jake instead of reupping him to a long-term contract makes some sense. But I wonder if they could get away with signing him to a 3/4 year deal?