bbfan419
Registered User
Oh, come on. Take away the Daugavins dangle and we could've swept that series. Rask was much better than Crawford that series, and Crawford was really good.
But we didn't and when we needed him he was not there, game 4 losing 6-5 he could not stop a beach ball, then of course the famous collapse in game 6. I admit that was his best season and he was the reason we beat the Pens in the ECF, but outside of that year he has not really ever carried the team at times like elite goalies do. Would rather have Matt Murray young goalie on cheaper deal and I think he is a very good goalie, then we deal Rask for a d- man.