Stickpucker
Playmaka
- Jan 18, 2014
- 16,267
- 39,509
If you breakdown the +/-, it really isn't indicative of what you are suggesting. Edmonton scored 6 goals:
2 PPG (no minus's for any Canes player)
1 SHG (- for anyone on the PP, but it's not indicative of the top two lines being taken advantage of)
1 ENG (- for anyone on the ice, but again not a case of top two lines being taken advantage of. Clearly the best offensive players are the only ones that will be on the ice in an EN situation so Aho and Svech will get a - there)
1 Horrible misplay by Andersen. Svech, Necas and Aho (who just jumped onto the ice as Kotkaniemi changed) all got a - because of it. Again, not indicative of that line being taken advantage of.
1 ES goal, the 2-1 for Kane (I believe Staal, Fast and Martinook were on the ice, but it was Burns that caused that).
Svech, Kotkaniemi, Necas dominated possession numbers and were in no way taken advantage of by Edmonton. Aho's line though was caved in and definitely lost that battle so no argument there. Other than the ENG and Horrible misplay by Andersen, none of them were scored on 5v5.
The ol' man has still got it. It's like watching a Rocky movie....