I think some of our expectations were blown away in the Sharks series. Players played hard, showed girt and tenacity which set us up for failure going into this Vegas series. We’re not a team that’s going to win or even hang with the heavy clubs (St. Louis/Vegas/Colorado) we may win a couple games against them, but they’re a better team than we are.
Now with that said, we have a lot of cap space coming off the books at the end of the year. We have seen what BA wants to do and we still have a few country club members on the roster. I think we’ll see that new brand of hockey after we see what BA does with the money and who he brings in.
Fire the coach first, though.
Agreed. I think we kind of swapped out some pieces, but in the end, it is the same song and dance.
Pitlick replaces Grabner. Less speed, same energy, a little more bite. But nothing more elevated than that.
Cags for Hinostroza. Brassard and Larsson replace Soderberg and Stepan. We did not really upgrade, and while we see a little more zip, it is all of 4 games into a season. If we still have this zip 35 games in, okay, we have a little more fight in us to work with. I don't think we have a country club, but the staff does not challenge the players enough, and that is where complacency comes in.
Just out of curiosity, we know who Armstrong brought in, and we were aware that at least one player in the $3-6 M per year AAV would be traded to get 2 or 3 bottom 6 types in. Would Armstrong and Chayka's lists be extremely different? Personally, i think that Larsson, Brassard and Pitlick would have been high on Chayka's list, along with Maroon. I don't believe Hayden would have been on his list.
Prout, maybe? Or maybe the Stepan trade could have been a little different to add a bottom 6 and a 4th round pick?
Probably not worth getting answers, but i don't think that the lineup between Armstrong's pickups and Chayka's (if still present) would have been that terribly different at all.