GDT: Game 3: Red Wings at rags 7:00 pm et 10/14/24

RRhoads

Registered User
Mar 10, 2015
3,145
3,087
Norway
Didn't watch all of the third period, but I think we looked pretty good against a good team. Kasper would have given us a better chance to win, in my opinion.

Some of the issues in the defensive zone from last year still linger, and it causes so much unnecessary D-zone time. Whipping the puck along the board to an opponent is getting really old. They do it so often, I am starting to believe it is by choice.

I think Edvinsson should be on the second PP unit.
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,458
10,970
Berggren, like Hudler before him, is at his core a playmaking catalyst. If you stick him with talent, he has the ability to make a line better. But there needs to be a base level of offensive inclination in his linemates. He's not a "f*** it, I'll do it myself" offensive player. Not at the NHL level. So if you stick him on a line opposite Motte, there really isn't anything he can do with that. It's telling that some of the best chances he's had so far is with Edvinsson. Because Edvinsson knows that with Berggren on the ice if he jumps up, he'll get the puck.

This is just excuses. Good offensive players can produce regardless who they play with.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: OgeeOgelthorpe

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
14,804
8,023
Bellingham, WA


billy-madison-comedy.gif

It's really hard to take Fester's evaluations of goalies seriously when he can't even evaluate his own goalies.

Just start Talbot, and if he starts shitting the bed then go into tank mode. Just go all in on Cam, it's obvious Lyon and Husso aren't NHL starters.

I missed the game, but I'm glad I did.
 

jfrank21

Registered User
Oct 1, 2009
1,169
1,453
Berggren, like Hudler before him, is at his core a playmaking catalyst. If you stick him with talent, he has the ability to make a line better. But there needs to be a base level of offensive inclination in his linemates. He's not a "f*** it, I'll do it myself" offensive player. Not at the NHL level. So if you stick him on a line opposite Motte, there really isn't anything he can do with that. It's telling that some of the best chances he's had so far is with Edvinsson. Because Edvinsson knows that with Berggren on the ice if he jumps up, he'll get the puck.
And like Hudler before him, Berggren is getting the Babcock treatment from Newsy. Sticking him with players who are not anywhere near his offensive iq and creativity, so hes not getting points. And since hes not getting points, casuals think he sux. Its ridiculous, why not try him with Raymond and like Compher. Then maybe Larkin Tank and Cat. Maybe Copp, Kane and Ras...let Kane bounce a couple in off Copp, Abby style...but no, this is much too difficult for a multi million dollar coach to devise and practice with once or twice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OgeeOgelthorpe

jfrank21

Registered User
Oct 1, 2009
1,169
1,453
This is just excuses. Good offensive players can produce regardless who they play with.
Not when you are a gifted offensive catalyst, then your game only shines with other talented, creative players. That sort of thing is non existant in players like Copp and Ras, they get their goals and points from grinding, not offensive iq and skill.
 

Henkka

Registered User
Jan 31, 2004
32,245
13,223
Tampere, Finland
Pretty good game.

Finally the Top6 lines were working, best games from them. The trend is clearly upwards.

Just unbelieveable game from Shesterkin. You can't ask more for those scoring chances against him.

This team is going on to right direction.
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,458
10,970
Not when you are a gifted offensive catalyst, then your game only shines with other talented, creative players. That sort of thing is non existant in players like Copp and Ras, they get their goals and points from grinding, not offensive iq and skill.

If he is so good produce and force your way up the lineup. Point is, that he isn't good enough to force his way up the lineup.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad