major major
Registered User
- Feb 18, 2013
- 14,598
- 1,669
I don't think the disillusionment is due to losing. I think there is a significant perception issue when Matt is put in place of Boone.
Last year our top line was Cam, Dubie, Boone. And that was a very productive line. Boone with 31 goals. Cam with 28, Dubie 15. That is a legit top line. A second line of Saad with 30 goals, Wennie the Poo and the the imaginary Bjork scoring 20 is a legit second line. Foligno and Hartnell on the third line? Not bad at all.
But Boone, Dubie and Hartnell have been horrible so far. So when you replace Boone's 30 goals with Calvert's and his 12 goals, your legit first line suddenly becomes a third line. That to me is a very disturbing optical problem. We really do look like an expansion team with that kind of lineup where our first line is really a third line. The bad start by Dubie and Boone is very, very distressing. WE need Boone to be a 30 goal scorer.
1. I think you were closer to the truth in calling it an "optical problem". It's the same players on different lines.
2. Once again, it's not a first line, with Jenner or with Calvert. That's an optical issue. The top scoring line is going to be the one with Saad and Wennberg on it.
3. Boone-Dubi-Cam was effective offensively but that was more than outweighed by their defensive issues (I'm not just talking about this year, look at their GA/60 together last year). Those were all good defensive players before coming together so of course they should be split up.
4. Calvert-Dubi-Cam is just a better line. They have more minutes together than any Jackets trio, and they work.
5. Switching from 30-15-28 goals to 12-15-28 goals does not make it go from a 1st line to a 3rd line. That's still 56 goals. How many lines around the league have 56 goals? Not nearly enough for every team to have 2. I don't have numbers by line but if the average goals per player on a line is 19, and there are only 100 forwards in the league who hit 19 goals, then it's clearly a second line and not a bad one.