Bleach Clean
Registered User
- Aug 9, 2006
- 27,473
- 7,178
Thats the way the game was shaping up to be. I don't think there was anything wrong with that thinking when 59 min of the game went exactly that way.
Post-Game Talk: Game #21: Sharks 2, Canucks 1 in OT - At least we don't play tham again this season
- Thread starter Nuckles
- Start date
Thats the way the game was shaping up to be. I don't think there was anything wrong with that thinking when 59 min of the game went exactly that way.
bsjezz
Registered User
- Nov 28, 2011
- 895
- 0
mossey3535
Registered User
- Feb 7, 2011
- 14,071
- 11,318
But so did Schneids when he was on this team. It's not a coincidence, they got lazy for long stretches previous to Torts getting here. This one is more up to bad luck but yes, he made a glaring technical mistake on the OT winner IMO.
6 game home stand and the Canucks are the only team that will have a back to back in the 6
Without an opponent that came off a back to back. The Ducks had 3 in a row that had back to back games.
me2
Go ahead foot
The Sedins get hammered by these types of calls that wouldn't get called on Thornton or a bunch of other star veterans.
Without the Twins Burrows is a decent 2nd liner. I would put him back with the Twins because that is where he has had success.
3 in a row for the Ducks ? I don't think that's happened in this franchise's history....
Rather have Sturm + Samuelsson.
Sturm did not come with a big long term contract.
Vankiller Whale
Fire Benning
someone already ask the value of daniel and henrik....in the main board what the hell? panic......sigh 
Sturm didn't eat up 5M in cap space (or whatever the hell Booth is at.)
David Booth is like my house right now; a negative asset.
polarbearcub
Registered User
CCF23
Registered User
I hate David Booth. If he's somehow still here at the beginning of next season I want Gillis fired.
So in the last 8 games the Sharks have had 44 powerplay opportunities against the Canucks. The Canucks have only had 23.
Sometimes the NHL just can't help but show its bias.
Sometimes the NHL just can't help but show its bias.
Towel-Power
GoCanucksGo
Pretty much what I feel. I think some people are still in denial and believe they are a very good team that can run with the Hawks, Bruins etc of the league. Simply not true. Take the Canucks for what they are and what they are is a middle of the pack team that if they make the playoffs will probably make it as an 7th or 8th seed. I would be shocked to see this team do any real damage in the playoffs. I'm not just saying that because of this loss either. Hell they played real well tonight. Should have gotten the 2 points.
But just look at the line up. It's not a line up of a real legit contending team.
biturbo19
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2010
- 27,248
- 12,390
Well that was a really disappointing end to a pretty boring game.
lol @ the whining about the refs in this thread though. You can't hang this game on the officiating, sorry.
This team needs a 2nd line, badly. To me, it almost looks like the Twins are starting to get tired/worn down already...the last few games they've been making all kinds of mistakes defensively, getting caught behind plays, caught cheating, trying to take shortcuts...taking penalties. No surprise, almost no players in the league can play those kind of minutes night in and night out without cutting some corners somewhere. Especially when there is STILL no coherent breakout plan other than 'chip it up the wall and hope it gets out' or 'lug the puck up ice yourself from below the hashmarks'.:
lol @ the whining about the refs in this thread though. You can't hang this game on the officiating, sorry.
This team needs a 2nd line, badly. To me, it almost looks like the Twins are starting to get tired/worn down already...the last few games they've been making all kinds of mistakes defensively, getting caught behind plays, caught cheating, trying to take shortcuts...taking penalties. No surprise, almost no players in the league can play those kind of minutes night in and night out without cutting some corners somewhere. Especially when there is STILL no coherent breakout plan other than 'chip it up the wall and hope it gets out' or 'lug the puck up ice yourself from below the hashmarks'.
:
vanuck
Now with 100% less Benning!
- Dec 28, 2009
- 16,815
- 4,074
Luongos Knob
Daaaaa Nucks
- Jan 20, 2009
- 4,316
- 621
Barney Gumble
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2007
- 22,711
- 1
Keith Ballard was. We gave up more assets than what we gave up to get Booth. Booth will be buyout candidate #2 in any event (assuming he doesn't get hurt again - better to bench him to avoid that happening).
