G Yaroslav Askarov (2020, 11th, NSH; traded to SJS) - PART 2

Shark Finn

∀dministrator
Jan 5, 2012
2,761
2,955
Herwood
Given the NHL team's struggles, is it best for him to stay with the Baracuda and develop chemistry with potential future teammates like Mukhamadullin, Bystedt and Halttunen or would he help solve the Sharks' problems?

And if he is promoted, which former Devil is demoted/released?
There is no need to rush him in the NHL this season. As mentioned, Sharks' defence is ass and Askarov is no savior to the team. I'm sure he'll get his starts here and there in the NHL and is the first call up if one of Blackwood or Vanecek get injured.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,770
22,857
Bay Area
Given the NHL team's struggles, is it best for him to stay with the Baracuda and develop chemistry with potential future teammates like Mukhamadullin, Bystedt and Halttunen or would he help solve the Sharks' problems?

And if he is promoted, which former Devil is demoted/released?
Blackwood has been worse so far, but it's only been two games.

On one hand, I don't want to expose Askarov to the Sharks' defense. On the other... if he keeps playing like this with the Cuda, it's hard to justifying not promoting him. He's been so good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vortexy

GhostfaceWu

Shi Shaw
Feb 11, 2015
11,157
11,634
Still annoyed the oilers didn't make a play for him. Guys gonna be a pain in the ass for the Pacific division for a long time
 

The Colonel

Registered User
Jul 7, 2008
558
452
damn it's pretty badass that Askarov responded to the Saros contract extension by demanding a trade and then debuting in the A with two straight shutouts.

Gotta wonder if Predators management is regretting that one right now sitting 0-5
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,711
14,655
Somewhere on Uranus
Still annoyed the oilers didn't make a play for him. Guys gonna be a pain in the ass for the Pacific division for a long time


Oilers probobly did but did not have the assets the Preds wanted. This trade happened shortly after we lost Broberg and Halloway to the Blues. I think if the Oilers knew ahead of time what was coming, they would have traded both for him--but hindsight is a lovely thing. And of course the Oiler management is in love with Skinner at the NHL level and Oliver in the AHL. Why? You have me at a loss for words there

Wallstadt is going to be a pain in the ass as well
 
Last edited:

Soundgarden

#164303
Jul 22, 2008
18,015
6,902
Spring Hill, TN
damn it's pretty badass that Askarov responded to the Saros contract extension by demanding a trade and then debuting in the A with two straight shutouts.

Gotta wonder if Predators management is regretting that one right now sitting 0-5
It's not like we didn't know his potential, him and his agent didn't want to wait around to be Saros' back up and outplay him. It's funny he could have played in game one over wedegwood had he been patient.

2 1sts for a player requesting a trade isn't horrible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patty Ice

The Colonel

Registered User
Jul 7, 2008
558
452
It's not like we didn't know his potential, him and his agent didn't want to wait around to be Saros' back up and outplay him. It's funny he could have played in game one over wedegwood had he been patient.

2 1sts for a player requesting a trade isn't horrible.

Sure it’s not an Erat for Forsberg situation or something but Trotz bet heavily that the Predators time is now and that Askarov, representing the future, didn’t really have a place in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

Soundgarden

#164303
Jul 22, 2008
18,015
6,902
Spring Hill, TN
Sure it’s not an Erat for Forsberg situation or something but Trotz bet heavily that the Predators time is now and that Askarov, representing the future, didn’t really have a place in it.
There was a plan for Askarov, we brought back Mitch Korn, the age gap between Askarov and Saros was large enough that Askarov could come in as a back up and then 1a/1b, etc, it sucks that he couldn't see or didn't want to be a part of those plans.

Although Trotz isn't without fault, apparently he didn't like his showy play and celebrations, which is what makes him such a great player. Go figure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patty Ice

Quinton Byfield

Registered User
Jul 25, 2021
357
894
There was a plan for Askarov, we brought back Mitch Korn, the age gap between Askarov and Saros was large enough that Askarov could come in as a back up and then 1a/1b, etc, it sucks that he couldn't see or didn't want to be a part of those plans.

Although Trotz isn't without fault, apparently he didn't like his showy play and celebrations, which is what makes him such a great player. Go figure.
I think Saros being under contract for the next 9 years means Askarov and his representation sees things fine.

Both teams got what they wanted, there shouldn’t be any hard feelings.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,770
22,857
Bay Area
I think Saros being under contract for the next 9 years means Askarov and his representation sees things fine.

Both teams got what they wanted, there shouldn’t be any hard feelings.
Yeah, this "we had a plan for Askarov" is strictly bullshit from the Preds organization. Unless the plan was to make Juuse Saros a $9M backup in a year or two, there was no plan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slumpy43

Soundgarden

#164303
Jul 22, 2008
18,015
6,902
Spring Hill, TN
Yeah, this "we had a plan for Askarov" is strictly bullshit from the Preds organization. Unless the plan was to make Juuse Saros a $9M backup in a year or two, there was no plan.

It's not unreasonable to expect Askarov to come to camp and beat out Wedgewood or to do time as an AHL starter and an NHL back up.

Nor is it out of the realm of possibility that we could have traded Saros in the future or Askarov when he had played more than 2 nhl games and his value was higher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patty Ice

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
49,770
22,857
Bay Area
It's not unreasonable to expect Askarov to come to camp and beat out Wedgewood or to do time as an AHL starter and an NHL back up.

Nor is it out of the realm of possibility that we could have traded Saros in the future or Askarov when he had played more than 2 nhl games and his value was higher.
There was no path to Askarov becoming a starting NHL goaltender within two years in Nashville. There is no world in which a $9M goaltender loses his starting role unless he's really bad. If he's really bad, then absolutely no one is touching his contract, so Nashville is stuck with him.

You think Askarov should have stuck around just to help build up value so Nashville could get more value in a trade for him? You're insane.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad