Forge
Blissfully Mediocre
I think we are done there. No place on the right side, don't want him playing his offSo are we brining back (Colin) Miller this season, or that was enough of that?
I think we are done there. No place on the right side, don't want him playing his offSo are we brining back (Colin) Miller this season, or that was enough of that?
Ever heard of salary retention? We're only paying $6 million for the two goalies, not $10I hope the two 34 year old goalies of Markstrom $6M and Allen $3.850M at $10M total, work out. Very expensive for old goalies. I understand it is a short term plan of 2 years while Daws and Schmidt develop.
Ok Fitz, that's done. The defense had a need, before Bahl was traded so now the need is greater for a defensive group. Find someone, a veteran or young superstar. It is hard to find young good defensemen they take so long to develop.
We could use some help on offense but not necessary at the start of the season if you have a solid defense. We can pick up offense at the trade deadline.
Go Devild
You also don't spend major assets bringing in another center because you assume Jack's shoulder will blow out or attempt to mitigate disaster with other insurance policies before you fill your imminent need spots. In a cap system you have to take risks at some positions and you'll never have depth everywhere no matter how many picks you keep.I'm not assuming the worst will happen. Think about it this way: Do you make make big life decisions based on the assumption that absolutely everything is going to go perfectly? Of course not. That's how people end up being house poor or getting divorced after 6 months.
You need to hope the best but budget for things that might not work out the way you hope. Do I assume the pick will be 11? Absolutely not. Do I acknowledge it could be given a huge amount of unknowns? Yes. I think it would be foolish not to.
Damn the rare "wrong about everything" post. You don't see that in the wild too often.
Ever heard of salary retention? We're only paying $6 million for the two goalies, not $10
Brendan Dillon is a solid option but his time played per game isnt really up where Id want it to be; though hed also be signed for less term
Brady Skjei is more in line with what I think we need but also will cost more with longer term; though he isnt as defensive as Id like
Unless Siegenthaler rebounds in a major way, then Dillon would just be an expensive third pair dman
did marino have his one and only career year for us in 2022? imo, hes not as good as 22 but not as bad as 23.. i still believe hes a solid 2nd pairingI think he's already better than Siegs and if Marino doesn't suck ass again, that's a good pairing.
I'm not assuming the worst will happen. Think about it this way: Do you make make big life decisions based on the assumption that absolutely everything is going to go perfectly? Of course not. That's how people end up being house poor or getting divorced after 6 months.
You need to hope the best but budget for things that might not work out the way you hope. Do I assume the pick will be 11? Absolutely not. Do I acknowledge it could be given a huge amount of unknowns? Yes. I think it would be foolish not to.
My thoughts exactly, 100%.I'm wondering if they target LHD via trade still.
I think the UFA market for the better defenders is going to be absolutely bonkers. I think Utah in particular may go absolutely YOLO. Given that I'd like to see us land a top 9 guy who can play comfortably on a second line, I think that's going to be hard to keep up with which makes me think that if they did resolve this issue via FA, it's going to a lower echelon guy
Reach out to Vegas, give up something for McNabb. He's only 2.8 on the cap, but if they want the captain back, they need to create more space. I think the cost on Theodore is probably too much, but see what's there.
Call pitt about Pettersson.
This move seals it for me. I'm ready to say Fitz is a mediocre, at best, GM and this team isn't taking the next step with him making decisions. I admire the majority of this places ability to positively spin anything this team does, while condescendingly chastising anyone that questions Emperor Fitz.I hope Kahk tears it up wherever he goes. I get wanting to go for a proven guy but this sure as shit isn’t big game hunting. It’s Fitz tunnel vision from the start that’ll end up in another cooked geriatric.
This move seals it for me. I'm ready to say Fitz is a mediocre, at best, GM and this team isn't taking the next step with him making decisions. I admire the majority of this places ability to positively spin anything this team does, while condescendingly chastising anyone that questions Emperor Fitz.
A couple year review for Fitz:
1) Meier trade was a pure hockey trade. Devs overpaid a bit imo considering the circumstances, but it made sense. Can't blame a GM for that, but he also doesn't deserve a ribbon for a fair-ish value trade.
2) The horrific, unjustifiable Palat contract that hurt this team from day 1. This place of course blindly defended this albatross of a contract somehow, saying it's okay to overpay because we had cap space. That changed quick, eh? It's one thing to overpay by >$1m aav, that happens a lot. It's another to overpay aav and give absurd term to an old, complementary player.
3) Proceeded to cling to Ruff when it was obvious he lost the team. Several of us were fearful of this EXACT scenario considering anyone objective realized the Devs easily could have gotten humiliated by the Rags in round 1 if Schmid didn't play out of his mind. The team was also entirely uncompetitive in the majority of their playoffs games
4) ^ Held onto Ruff while also not fixing the one alleged excuse Ruff had: goaltending. Then finally knee jerk "addresses" goaltending after firing Ruff. WTF??
So let's now transition to Fitz/Brodeur and the goaltending fiasco in honor of this thread:
1) They hilariously sign Corey Crawford when he was 110% obviously cooked. I literally ranted this from day 1 of signing. I have no idea how anyone watching hockey could have offered Crawford that contract. None. Hockey malpractice. Underrated and overlooked as one of the dumbest GM decisions I've ever seen. They are fortunate it didn't hurt them more. Ironically, I see the same people in this thread that hilariously defended the Crawford move and chastised any criticism....now condemning anyone on the fence with this trade.Now, these moves aren't on the same level, but you get the point.
2) This past season, the Kahk trade made a ton of sense. Love that trade. Wanted it earlier in the season if possible, but better late than never. Good job Fi......wait, what?? They traded WHAT for Allen?? As I've ranted before, the Allen trade was mind-numbingly stupid. Insane overpay and directly hindered any likelihood of re-signing Kahk, while still leaving a hole at goalie. So they gave up material assets for an old goalie that wanted off his current team and has looked rough for a while now...in a lost season. Do people here think the GMs of the 16 playoff teams are stupid??? Isn't it weird not a single one of them wanted to add vet Allen as goalie depth for a run??
3) So now we aren't re-signing the youngest goalie (Kahk) of the 3, while paying material assets for a soon to be 35 year old goalie with more miles on him (NHL+) than a 1991 Toyota Camry. Spare me the advanced stats. The guy was average 3 of the past 4 years. He has a career losing record despite playing for mostly competitive teams. Look, is he an upgrade at goalie? Obviously, but that's a low bar. A GM can make this trade if they have made the playoffs for several years and feel they are right on the cusp of winning the Cup. The Devs just missed the friggin playoffs by a mile! And in a season where the Washington Corpses and Isles made it.
Bahl isn't a nothing add btw. An NHL dman at $1m aav and RFA status isn't worthless. I agree with the frustration in him not being physical enough, but he's already a bottom pair dman without that element. God forbid he ever gets even a touch of a mean streak...
First, Bahl was not remotely close to the worse player in the top 6. We had freaking Brendan Smith playing 28+ minutes a night in the last week of the season, over 20 a minute a night 6 times in his last 14 games. That's how bad our depth wasJim: "Defense in terrible. Goalie won't fix anything."
Jim: "Defense has to get much better"
*Devils trade the worst player in their top 6 defensemen who would get pushed out by virtue of getting the better defenders Jim is screeching for"
Jim: "Kevin Bahl is a premium asset and underrated. They are stupid for trading him"
Willing to give him one more chance this year because his impacts have always been strong and he's been injured a ton. But he's got to contribute and stay healthy this year.I ain’t reading all that but I’m glad we have this player and won’t cry because he makes a bit too much.
View attachment 884881
View attachment 884882
First, Bahl was not remotely close to the worse player in the top 6. We had freaking Brendan Smith playing 28+ minutes a night in the last week of the season, over 20 a minute a night 6 times in his last 14 games. That's how bad our depth was
Check this shit out...
Brendan Smith
3/19 vs Pitt 27:00 f***ing minutes
3/23 vs OTT 20:47
4/3 vs NYR fight game 28:20
4/6 vs OTT 22:47
4/7 vs NSH 21:47
4/11 vs TOR 23:48
This is grotesque. If your depth is so shitty that you have to play Brendan Smith like this, your team sucks ass.
We keep blowing depth at every turn...do you not see this?
Last I saw, Smith isn't on the team right now. You complain about the defense now.
The projected 6 was:
Hughes
Dougie
Siegs
Nemec
Marino
Bahl
So yeah, Bahl was number 6 on a defense you're screaming needs to be upgraded.
"Depth" is not a premium asset.
Well, I suppose Smith is technically on the team until July 1 lol
On paper unlikely considering Markstrom has been a bit of a workhorse.What are the odds Allen ends up playing more games this season?
*pulls pin, leaves room*
stop it, he's literally pushing 90. he's earned the right to say whatever tf he wants.