I’m not sure you have as compelling an argument as you think. McKay and Levi have nearly identical GAA, but Levi’s sv pct is 23 pts higher. Shooters score on Levi once every 23 shots. Once every 14 shots for McKay. That’s the difference between .935 and .958.
instantly saying no one is more important to their team in college hockey???
100% this. You could replace McKay with any average college goalie and Mankato's record would be the same. McKay will likely be one of the reasons Mankato chokes again. Devi looked great against Providence, but other than that has played a pretty easy schedule. Will be interesting to see how Northeastern does in the 2nd half and playoffs.I disagree. Those players are great but they play on teams with much more talent and better systems than Northeastern. I believe if you removed Levi from Northeastern than the results would change more drastically than removing any single player from another team in college hockey.
Give Buffalo's scouts credit.
For including him in the trade for Reinhart?
I would think the The Panthers scouting dept(with a big nod to Louongo) would deserve credit for even drafting him, when it looked like he would go undrafted, but ok.
Yes, Buffalo deserves credit for wanting him in return for Reinhart(along with the pick).
YEs, Florida would get the main credit here since it's much more difficult to scout amateurs. But NHL scouts have been high on him much longer than internet/HF Boards scouts. His stock had been skyrocketing leading up to the trade.
Does that instantly mean he is more important to his team because of save percentage Points than other players.
The previous posters argument was “talent” while Minnesota state has 1 or 2 drafted player on their roster, compared to 7 or 8 for northeastern and northeastern had 28 ranked schedule of strength compared to 8th for Minnesota state or 5th for North Dakota with sanderson. SOS can’t be ignored
Long Island university has what 3 wins and isnt even in a conference
instantly saying no one is more important to their team in college hockey??? I’m not making that quick jump to judgement yet.
Something of note regarding McKay. He has impressive numbers, however he also faces considerably fewer shots per game on average. McKay has faced an average of just under 18 shots per game. He has only faced 25 shots or more 2 times this season, and has 5 games where he has faces 15 or less. He had a shut-out where he faced a whopping 5 shots and another where he faced 9.Does that instantly mean he is more important to his team because of save percentage Points than other players.
The previous posters argument was “talent” while Minnesota state has 1 or 2 drafted player on their roster, compared to 7 or 8 for northeastern and northeastern had 28 ranked schedule of strength compared to 8th for Minnesota state or 5th for North Dakota with sanderson. SOS can’t be ignored
Long Island university has what 3 wins and isnt even in a conference
instantly saying no one is more important to their team in college hockey??? I’m not making that quick jump to judgement yet.
I disagree. In his draft year, I had Levi ranked in the 70s, and others like @IHaveNoCreativity also had him much higher than where he was picked. The fact that Levi fell to 212th shows that NHL scouts really weren't all that high on him.YEs, Florida would get the main credit here since it's much more difficult to scout amateurs. But NHL scouts have been high on him much longer than internet/HF Boards scouts. His stock had been skyrocketing leading up to the trade.
If the huskies had a tougher schedule would you say he is the most important to his team?
I disagree. In his draft year, I had Levi ranked in the 70s, and others like @IHaveNoCreativity also had him much higher than where he was picked. The fact that Levi fell to 212th shows that NHL scouts really weren't all that high on him.
It’s the kind of numbers that are truly unsustainable…but he’s sustaining them..958 is truly outrageous.
.958!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The claim was most important to his team, which is one of the tougher claims to quantify.
Dryden McKay got his 8th shutout tonight
Sanderson and ND lost all 5 of their leading scorers last year and they are back in the top 10 while he leads them in scoring
other players are just as important
Fair.
Levi stands out because of his youth and 7th round status.
McKay is 24 years old and a 4 consecutive year starter, and Sanderson is a 5th overall on a team with 9 drafted players.
While I think Levi is more "valuable" than those two, by a bit, a case can be made that Owen Savory is more valuable than all 3.
Not that it matters, but having a Hobey Baker winner playing in the NHL eventually is a factor in voting, and Levi seems a lock for that, and McKay/Savory do not.
I disagree. In his draft year, I had Levi ranked in the 70s, and others like @IHaveNoCreativity also had him much higher than where he was picked. The fact that Levi fell to 212th shows that NHL scouts really weren't all that high on him.
Talking about the Hobey Baker is different,
And talking about richter is different
Levi will probably win the Richter award as of right now, but pairwise and RPI hurts him in Hobey Baker voting, so a strong beanpot and NCAA should help a lot.
and NHL playing doesnt factor in voting.
For including him in the trade for Reinhart?
I would think the The Panthers scouting dept(with a big nod to Louongo) would deserve credit for even drafting him, when it looked like he would go undrafted, but ok.
Yes, Buffalo deserves credit for wanting him in return for Reinhart(along with the pick).
It takes a lot more courage to trade a first-line player for a prospect you believe in, than to use a 7th round pick on him.
Hahahahaha your list has the USHL ahead of the CHL. Its officially worthless. Its so incredibly biased what a joke. Its also based on players going NCAA not quality of team if you think USHL team quality is better than the CHL dont bother responding.