The alternative is Dubas trades a couple of Matthews/Marner/Nylander/Tavares. I'm sure Leaf fans would be overjoyed if he'd dealt Matthews or Marner away.
It's kind of a no-win situation for a GM if his "core" are playoff chokers. He's either got to hope he can bring in some character to offset the core choking or he's got to trade a couple of pieces of that core and hope he gets the Tkachuk end of the trade rather than the Huberdeau end of any star-for-star deal.
Isn't this just an example of Dubas' failure to evaluate talent?
He bet this season on Matt Murray and Samsonov when the Leafs had no goaltending.
Also, most Leafs fans would happily trade anyone on the team for success. The team is bigger than individual players.
You're arguing the players are chokers while simultaneously arguing that he couldn't trade them. If you know the players are chokers - there is no consequence to trading them - because you're losing anyway.
People need to stop quoting the Tkachuk/Huberdeau trade as if Tkachuk did not force a trade and refuse to sign with Calgary - forcing them to go to arbitration to extend the time they had to trade him before he walked as a UFA.
Also, the Huberdeau trade could still work out for Calgary. The players didn't gel but you can't blame a GM for trying - that's literally their job.
Well, unless you're Dubas - Dubas sat on the core he inherited and made the team arguably worse since he got there.
Dubas inherits:
Matthews (ELC), Marner (ELC), Nylander (ELC), Kadri (4.5M), Rielly (5M) + Kapanen/Moore/Johnsson
And turned that into the highest paid core in the league and traded Kadri for Kerfoot while signing an 11M Tavares. He also decided to protect Justin Holl at the expansion draft over Jared McCann - the Leafs could have used another 40 goal scorer instead of a 7th d-man.
The decisions Dubas made literally capstrapped the team. He walked into a better spot than he's leaving, but people think he 'built the team'.