aufheben
#Norris4Fox
Stop being difficult a 6-year-old could understand what I’m saying.How so?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
They don’t know how much their RFAs are going to cost so they’re not spending until then. Maybe, that’s my theory.
Stop being difficult a 6-year-old could understand what I’m saying.How so?
No it’s not. And when you factor in both of these players were not in the NHL at 18. Their miles can go further than most.Its not but it is the new 34
We always hear this but most players decline sharply at 30. That's just the reality.Those two players can still be effect well into their 30s. I really wish people would stop acting like 30 is the new 50.
Most is not all. It’s beyond lazy to just say welp he is 30 he’s done. It’s extremely important to do the homework on each player when making a decision like this. Bread man and Kreider are definitely two players that will not sharply decline when they go past the 30 mark.We always hear this but most players decline sharply at 30. That's just the reality.
By the time the RFA's are settled, they won't be any targets left and their trade chips will be effectively re-signed. Re-signing a guy to trade him the same off-season has never happened outside of video games.Stop being difficult a 6-year-old could understand what I’m saying.
They don’t know how much their RFAs are going to cost so they’re not spending until then. Maybe, that’s my theory.
We always hear this but most players decline sharply at 30. That's just the reality.
Oh my god I know that dude lirlBy the time the RFA's are settled, they won't be any targets left and their trade chips will be effectively re-signed. Re-signing a guy to trade him the same off-season has never happened outside of video games.
I get what you're saying about the financial outlook, but the way our team is constructed, we're done when those contracts are settled. Those players were the significant chips.
Or take the Hayes money and give it to Trouba a couple of months later.I'm still trying to figure out what changed that made Gorton trade away better players in Miller and Hayes but decided to keep Kreider 1-2 years later.
We always hear this but most players decline sharply at 30. That's just the reality.
What's stupid is thinking that Fast hates it here so much that it would take a $5 million offer to get him to not sign in motherf***ing Carolina for $2 million, and that GMs are powerless to do anything other than make monetary offers. GMs and Presidents, while were at it, are responsible for practically everything. If Fast wasn't happy here, I'm not convinced they adequately responded to that.
So then we agree and we're arguing for no reason. Good talk.Oh my god I know that dude lirl
No it’s not. And when you factor in both of these players were not in the NHL at 18. Their miles can go further than most.
He could see Kreider being a leader on an increasingly youthful team. He could not with the other two.I'm still trying to figure out what changed that made Gorton trade away better players in Miller and Hayes but decided to keep Kreider 1-2 years later.
I just think it's bold to assume Panarin is worth 11+M from 31-33 and it isn't maximizing his value.So using the Panarin example, the only way that you see the signing as beneficial is if we're competitive in the first 3 years of the contract? And after that there's no value since he's over 30?
I'm just confused how you don't see the long term value of signing Panarin when we did. Especially when you couple that with guys like Laf and Kakko coming into their prime years at the same time, it seems like the perfect blend from a contract and depth perspective.
I’m saying it’s different than DECIDING to do nothing.So then we agree and we're arguing for no reason. Good talk.
I'm still trying to figure out what changed that made Gorton trade away better players in Miller and Hayes but decided to keep Kreider 1-2 years later.
There is so much data to factor in when talking about a players decline.The decline in players starts a lot earlier than it used to. Some can avoid it but most secumb to it. Panarin i don't think will be a problem, the Kreider deal will not age well because he is being paid like a 25+ goal scorer when he has only done that 2 times out of 7 years, most of those years on the top line and top pp. So there is a contrast in ages but the decline starts at 30 for most outside of the elite players in the league.
It’s pretty normal from the Rangers organization. I feel like we’ve done that to most of our RFAsDoes nobody care that all our RFAs filed for arbitration? Or is it just not that big of a deal and I’m stupid?
I’m saying it’s different than DECIDING to do nothing.
I wouldn’t blame him for simply preferring to play in Carolina. He’s going to be a perfect fit there.I am curious what the Rangers offer was. Because reports indicate there was an offer for Fast to choose from. So now it’s a matter of what was different.