GDT: Free Agent Frenzy

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
We always hear this but most players decline sharply at 30. That's just the reality.
Most is not all. It’s beyond lazy to just say welp he is 30 he’s done. It’s extremely important to do the homework on each player when making a decision like this. Bread man and Kreider are definitely two players that will not sharply decline when they go past the 30 mark.


Neither of them starting playing NHL regularly at 18
Neither of them have had a serious injury (not counting the blood clot as it would of happen to Kreider if he wasn’t playing hockey so it’s not a injury that will change his playing longevity unless it happens again which is beyond slim)

those two notions alone is good enough to assume they will be good past 30
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chytilmania
Stop being difficult a 6-year-old could understand what I’m saying. :laugh:

They don’t know how much their RFAs are going to cost so they’re not spending until then. Maybe, that’s my theory.
By the time the RFA's are settled, they won't be any targets left and their trade chips will be effectively re-signed. Re-signing a guy to trade him the same off-season has never happened outside of video games.

I get what you're saying about the financial outlook, but the way our team is constructed, we're done when those contracts are settled. Those players were the significant chips.
 
By the time the RFA's are settled, they won't be any targets left and their trade chips will be effectively re-signed. Re-signing a guy to trade him the same off-season has never happened outside of video games.

I get what you're saying about the financial outlook, but the way our team is constructed, we're done when those contracts are settled. Those players were the significant chips.
Oh my god I know that dude lirl
 
I'm still trying to figure out what changed that made Gorton trade away better players in Miller and Hayes but decided to keep Kreider 1-2 years later.
Or take the Hayes money and give it to Trouba a couple of months later.

We got really aggressive all of a sudden and now it's like....I don't even know.

We can disagree until the cows come home but I don't how you can say I'm wrong for being confused.
 
We always hear this but most players decline sharply at 30. That's just the reality.

So using the Panarin example, the only way that you see the signing as beneficial is if we're competitive in the first 3 years of the contract? And after that there's no value since he's over 30?

I'm just confused how you don't see the long term value of signing Panarin when we did. Especially when you couple that with guys like Laf and Kakko coming into their prime years at the same time, it seems like the perfect blend from a contract and depth perspective.
 
What's stupid is thinking that Fast hates it here so much that it would take a $5 million offer to get him to not sign in motherf***ing Carolina for $2 million, and that GMs are powerless to do anything other than make monetary offers. GMs and Presidents, while were at it, are responsible for practically everything. If Fast wasn't happy here, I'm not convinced they adequately responded to that.

Just because you don't like Carolina doesn't mean he doesn't. Maybe Fast prefers a smaller city, there are so many factors. You're oversimplifying this completely and projecting your thoughts on the city to those of Fast.
 
No it’s not. And when you factor in both of these players were not in the NHL at 18. Their miles can go further than most.

The decline in players starts a lot earlier than it used to. Some can avoid it but most secumb to it. Panarin i don't think will be a problem, the Kreider deal will not age well because he is being paid like a 25+ goal scorer when he has only done that 2 times out of 7 years, most of those years on the top line and top pp. So there is a contrast in ages but the decline starts at 30 for most outside of the elite players in the league.
 
So using the Panarin example, the only way that you see the signing as beneficial is if we're competitive in the first 3 years of the contract? And after that there's no value since he's over 30?

I'm just confused how you don't see the long term value of signing Panarin when we did. Especially when you couple that with guys like Laf and Kakko coming into their prime years at the same time, it seems like the perfect blend from a contract and depth perspective.
I just think it's bold to assume Panarin is worth 11+M from 31-33 and it isn't maximizing his value.
 
I'm still trying to figure out what changed that made Gorton trade away better players in Miller and Hayes but decided to keep Kreider 1-2 years later.

I think a lot of the Miller one was personality/attitude based, but I agree that was weird to offload both of them but not Kreider, and now we're on the hunt for a #2c who's likely to cost what one of those two would have anyway
 
The decline in players starts a lot earlier than it used to. Some can avoid it but most secumb to it. Panarin i don't think will be a problem, the Kreider deal will not age well because he is being paid like a 25+ goal scorer when he has only done that 2 times out of 7 years, most of those years on the top line and top pp. So there is a contrast in ages but the decline starts at 30 for most outside of the elite players in the league.
There is so much data to factor in when talking about a players decline.

It’s 100x worse in the NFL. And we’re still trying to understand why the rate is so significant.
 
In the xx amount of years that I've committed to this team and hockey in general.
Outside of low budget teams, I honestly never seen a team handled quite like this.
I've been saying it all along with this GM..
 
I am curious what the Rangers offer was. Because reports indicate there was an offer for Fast to choose from. So now it’s a matter of what was different.
I wouldn’t blame him for simply preferring to play in Carolina. He’s going to be a perfect fit there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edge
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad