Irishguy42
Mr. Preachy
Posted in the Gorton thread, but figured it should be posted here: Gorton Eager to Mastermind a Rangers Rebuild - MSGNetworks.com
I just do not see what management sees in Lindgren. I get the whole character thing, but he projects as a bottom pairing defender assuming he makes the NHL
Not exactly something I would feel "very good" about
I just do not see what management sees in Lindgren. I get the whole character thing, but he projects as a bottom pairing defender assuming he makes the NHL
Not exactly something I would feel "very good" about
I just do not see what management sees in Lindgren. I get the whole character thing, but he projects as a bottom pairing defender assuming he makes the NHL
Not exactly something I would feel "very good" about
I just do not see what management sees in Lindgren. I get the whole character thing, but he projects as a bottom pairing defender assuming he makes the NHL
Not exactly something I would feel "very good" about
He definitely does. I had him around 15 originallyI don't think he has tools. I think people claim he has tools that he doesn't have. Its one of these things where if a player has a couple of athletic tools they assume that other skill-based tools must be present. We see this happen in every sport. If a player gets an "athletic" reputation, there's an assumption that actual real skills that go beyond the athletic side of the game will eventually show up.
He definitely does. I had him around 15 originally
His defense is very good. Great stick work. Good skater as well and not the cliche “good skater for his size.” A lot of untapped potential offensively as well, shows nice flashes. Lastly, a good passer who thinks the game well. I’d even say he has 1D potential. It’s very, very likely he’s not a 1D but I see tons of upside in him. Love this pick
It doesn't read odd at allAll around, this just reads very odd.
1. 'Whole character thing' ... yeah that little thing...
2. What is a bottom pair defender? I suppose Jeff Beukeboom was a bottom-pair defender.
3. What is a bottom pair defender in 2018? His skill-set is unique in that he's a bit of a throwback crease-clearer. In terms of skill-set, he'd probably be a top-2 guy in the 90s. Evolution of skill across the league.
I just do not see what management sees in Lindgren. I get the whole character thing, but he projects as a bottom pairing defender assuming he makes the NHL
Not exactly something I would feel "very good" about
Pretty much how I'm reading it. He throws big hits, and plays physical, which is great.I think Gorton is just kind of "excited" to get a defenseman with some snarl to his game in the lineup
I don’t see the offensive upside of Miller at all which is why I wasn’t real pleased with the pick.
If he becomes a bigger stronger Mcdonagh then great. I know he wants to be Seth Jones his fav player but I don’t see it.
Maybe if they were in better shape they would of produced more.So Shattenkirk reported to camp in terrible shape and then scored 18 pts in his first 25 games with a bad knee and Zibanejad reported to camp in terrible shape and then scored 27 goals on the year including 22 pts his first 24 games.
Maybe everyone should report to camp in terrible shape.
I'm surprised they let Maloney do media hits outside of MSG, he always seems to be leaking weird info
Also the name of what this process is doesn't matter. These things are fluid. If they had won Dahlin, you bet the process would have been expedited tremendously. Same with if they get Hughes next summer
Maybe if they were in better shape they would of produced more.
Being in top shape does prevent a lot of things.Yes because coming into camp in shape has a lot to do with preventing a knee condition and a concussion.