Speculation: Free Agent Frenzy Part V: Gorton is on McLeod Nine.

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thinks skjei is a really hard player to get a grasp on...I think he's going to benefit the most from a coaching staff...the overly complicated defensive scheme av used didn't help skjei or any defenseman whatsoever. I think if he keeps it a bit simpler he will be a lot better. I'd lock up skjei to 6x5m or thereabouts without too much consideration...it's when the term or dollars go beyond that that I get a little worried. He's good tho. Modern day defenseman. Big fast shows flashes of brilliance but very inconsistent and very raw still..amazingly.
 
As years go up his aav goes up not down. You're buying out more ufa years.
Sometimes that depends, some players will want the extra total contract money as its guaranteed (sans escrow, a work stoppage, roll back), and will actually take a little less than they may have been able to receive later on just to have the security. It give some security against them maybe not getting that next contract or a lesser one should they become injured or decline super early.
 
Last edited:
Well ...... Buch and Shesty threads over last couple years.

Back it up. Or is this something else you should retract?

But this post is another example of what I mean. You care more about discussing other posters than contributing anything to the discussion of the Rangers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Obviously, you are. You must not understand how the feature works.



Back it up. Or is this something else you should retract?

But this post is another example of what I mean. You care more about discussing other posters than contributing anything to the discussion of the Rangers.

1. I clearly don't.

2. And I clearly wont.
 
Publicly discussing ignore lists is not allowed, and this conversation is getting a little too personal, again. Becoming a problem all over the board lately. Take your beefs to PM, but be mindful that flaming rules also apply there should the conversation be reported.
 
Skjei is better offensively than Slavin, but Slavin is a much, much better defender than him.

I do understand the arguments for briding him, but I’m in the camp that would rather have him locked up as a cheaper % of the cap moving forward. I’m thinking down the line that a long-term deal with Brady can offer some more flexibility with future RFAs. I’d hope we do a similar deal with Buch next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Off Sides
I too am in the camp that would like to see longer term deals for Skjei and Hayes.

Of course that depends on their cap hits, but I don't think either player really declines over the next several years. They may improve, they may not, but I would still rather see the Rangers have what they are right now for several years, or trade them for a fair package at some future point rather than see the Rangers use that cap space next off-season to sign a player who is far more likely to decline during his next contract. It's a little different if I thought they were going to use any large chunks of cap space on UFAs who were going to be really good throughout their next deals, but I just don't think that realistically happens very often concerning any long term, expensive UFA signing who change teams in that process regardless of which team makes the signing.

Plus should that UFA really want to play for the Rangers, the cap space remaining sort of is what is it, having more may not lead to the Rangers getting the best deal on that contract. If the player is more concerned about getting the largest deal possible, is that something that should be super important for the Rangers to offer?

Clauses would be an interesting thing, I'm not sure, if the players want to remain with the Rangers past when those clauses would kick in, if they turn out to be super restrictive it leads to some questions. Seems to me it's more likely even if they were playing pretty well the team is going to have just a extra bit of motivation to move them should there be a no movement clause pending.

Spooner, I am pretty undecided what I'd like to see the Rangers sign him to.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GodlyRangers
Skjei is better offensively than Slavin, but Slavin is a much, much better defender than him.

I do understand the arguments for briding him, but I’m in the camp that would rather have him locked up as a cheaper % of the cap moving forward. I’m thinking down the line that a long-term deal with Brady can offer some more flexibility with future RFAs. I’d hope we do a similar deal with Buch next season.
I do believe that Skjei closes that defensive gap significantly under Quinn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cag29
Hope that JG doesn’t hand out a NMC to Hayes, limited NTC better (10 team exclusion).

As for remaining UFAs, wouldnt hurt to bring in Jurco, Shore, and Postsma for a look....
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernmeister
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad