Jimmy Hayes?Hayes for Petry + Lehkonen/Scherbak ?
Soooo...
Sign De Haan
Then trade Skjei? Maybe to Toronto?
I don’t see the point in having them both on long term deals here unless we can jettison Staal.
Yeah, that Reaves contract is going to hamstring VGK for years. C'mon man.Roussel, Reaves and Komarov all got BAD contracts.
I doubt we get a haul for Hayes without taking a bad contract back. I think that is a more realistic return, if we mentally prepare ourselves for something like that and Hayes does get moved we might be in a position to be pleasantly urprised but certainly not disappointed.Jimmy Hayes?
No it isn't. That doesn't mean it is a good deal. As I said earlier, maybe the Rangers were looking at a few guys but they decided to go elsewhere. I find that far more likely than the fact that we were just asleep at the wheel. We aren't the perennial playoff contender anymore. We are a rebuilding team that is at the bottom, not even on the upswing yet. That isn't very attractive to a lot of FA's.Yeah, that Reaves contract is going to hamstring VGK for years. C'mon man.
What is the problem with three years? You frontload the money, put some of it in signing bonuses and then trade the cap hit to a team that needs it or can bury it.Beagle was massively overpaid.
Maroon is still out there, Don't think we're an option.
JVR didn't take a Shattenkirk Deal.
Perron got 4X4, which was likely too rich for our blood.
Riley Nash got 3 years.
Ian Cole got 3 years. Slight overpay for him too.
Grabner got 3 years.
Reider I'm with you, apparently we were on him (depending on who you listen to). It's also possible that he had an offer from the Rangers and didn't choose us.
Kempny signed before the 1st.
Roussel and Komarov got horrendous deals. Those were guys I would have loved on a 1 or 2 year commitment. Reeves chose to stay in Vegas.
I'd rather play Beleskey (Yes, he sucks, but so do some of those guys listed above) and/or add a few bad contracts like Martin or Brower than pay out the ass for a UFA.
I wish they showed this type of restraint more often. Hopefully a sign of things to come where they'll only shell out money when its a no brainier. That option didn't exist this season.
YES!!!!!!!!I could careless if we suck this season or how bad we look as long as some of the kids show progression, especially if somehow we're bad enoughwhere we get lucky and have a good shot at Jack Hughes.
I also dont mind keeping all the cap space on the off chance that guys like EK, Panarin or even Seguin end up hitting FA next season.
Dallas?I'm sure there are some dark horse teams who might be interested in Hayes. I have a hard time seeing Boston dealing DeBrusk for him though.
Even if the Rangers do nothing else, I don't see how this is a team that will be rushing kids into the lineup. Plenty of players to play the big minutes and insulate them.
I doubt we get a haul for Hayes without taking a bad contract back. I think that is a more realistic return, if we mentally prepare ourselves for something like that and Hayes does get moved we might be in a position to be pleasantly urprised but certainly not disappointed.
After taking Spezza and adding Hintz i dont see what else would interest us that Dallas would be willing to give up. Klingberg is going nowhere.Dallas?
Dallas?
Would you take Backes from them to sweeten the deal? They wanna unload his contract and he checks off a few boxes for us.I don't know. Just taking a quick peak, they have a lot of guys coming due for contracts in the next 2-3 years - Bergeron, Rask, Krug, etc. Center is a more important position than wing. Bostons window has a few more years. Trade DeBrusk for Hayes. Give Hayes a 5 year deal. Win the cup. Trade Hayes in 2-3 years for a nice return. Retool and start over.
What is the problem with three years? You frontload the money, put some of it in signing bonuses and then trade the cap hit to a team that needs it or can bury it.
Loom at the Matt Martin contract Toronto is trying to move right now. That is the model.
I look at it as the coach's mission (and the vets) to create a culture of busting your ass every shift for yourself and the guys next to you. That was one great thing Torts did. Doesn't matter if you lose, you just focus on your shift, your off-ice work that you put in, your job. Pick each other up. Fight for each other. Build comraderie.I just worry that we're going to start the year with a bunch of rookies and get our **** kicked in every night. Like, ugly, ugly, losses. If that happens, I think it's bad for the kids involved in it, even if we have another veteran presence or two around. I always believe kids develop best when they're in a competitive environment and it feels like the games have real competitive meaning. I'm not suggesting that we turn ourselves into a playoff contender, but I think we need to do more to avoid being a cellar dweller.
Dallas?
Originally posted 6/26...
UFA Players who interest me...
Jay Beagle -- leadership, great usefulness
Patrick Maroon -- hard worker
JVR (only with a Shattenkirk like contract, which I believe is possible)
David Perron -- maybe
Riley Nash (likely to be gone before a Hayes trade develops)
Derek Ryan
Ian Cole -- solid defenseman and locker room leader
Michael Grabner
Toby Reider -- He is a real useful 3rd/4th line player as long as he is paid accordingly
Michel Kempny -- showed me a lot in the playoffs
And one of -- Antoine Roussel, Ryan Reaves or Leo Komarov (need sandpaper) Reaves also a real good locker room guy
Afterwards, I added Blake Comeau to the list
Duclair is still out there people ...