SprDaVE
Moderator
- Sep 20, 2008
- 55,702
- 40,835
Kappy and A.J were 3.5m players who we replace with ??
Mik is a 4.5m player who we replaced with who ???
Hyman is a 5.5m player who we replaced with Bunting making 990K. Bunting was good playing with Matty but you can't tell me Bunting was better than Hyman in the last playoffs.
Bunting, Kampf and Kerfoot are pending UFAs that we probably won't be able to afford next year. Rinse and repeat.
No sense in debating this further, The answer will be known when the teams hit the ice.
Kappy and AJ were replaced by Mikheyev, Engvall and other internal promotions in the same way Mikheyev and Hyman were replaced by other signings and promotions. They needed cap space. Bunting, Kampf and Kerfoot will be replaced by *shocker* other players. It is funny that we're already complaining and worried about losing Bunting, Kampf and Kerfoot and we forget how they got here in the first place as if they are irreplaceable.
The point of the salary cap is identifying your franchise and elite level players and surrounding them with replaceable players. They become good, you have to replace them. It's a good problem to have. This is why teams like the Lightning, the Penguins, the CAps and the Avalanche have lost many good players over the last few years.
Definitely no point debating this further. I'd probably look at other teams and how they operate under the salary cap to understand how any of this works. You're just angry and negative to be angry and negative.