Burrowsaurus
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2013
- 46,075
- 18,697
Okay but do isles easily accept a package with greig for s dobsonI easily package Greig for Dobson.
Him or Andersson.
Okay but do isles easily accept a package with greig for s dobsonI easily package Greig for Dobson.
Him or Andersson.
Imagine trading any of our good D now when we barely have enough for 1 legit pairing.When we traded EK we committed to a full rebuild tear down.
Imagine trading EK in his prime when we were trying to make noise in the playoffs….
Not the same thing
I would wait for a true RHD like WeegarI'd move Greig and a top 3 protected first for Chychrun. In an instant
How good is Weegar at RD? His best showings have been him playing LD with Ekblad.I would wait for a true RHD like Weegar
Imagine trading any of our good D now when we barely have enough for 1 legit pairing.
We haven't had a good D core in over a decade and now that one is perhaps shaping up we have people looking to trade some pieces away BEFORE we even have it established.
Seems counterintuitive to me.
Are there any other proper RD available on some of the cap crunch teams?
Like isn't Even Rodriguez rumored to be available?
Seems like we're in for the duration on Chychrun, but wondering if there's a plan b option out there that wont cost us
Pinto
Greig
Sanderson
Soogard
Kinda fine with losing
Jarventie
Brannstrom
Sokolov
JBD
He is by far the Islanders best asset to get an impact forward. They really don’t have much else to leverage as Pulock just signed an 8 year extension with a full NTC. Islanders are not a playoff team with their current forward group.Why are people deluding themselves about getting Dobson? He just signed an extremely friendly contract, he’s poised to be a top D for years and he’s very young. Teams aren’t going to give that up, and if there is some odd reason they would, it would take an obscene overpay.
Pulocks NTC doesn’t kick in until year 3 of his 8 year contract if I’m recalling correctlyHe is by far the Islanders best asset to get an impact forward. They really don’t have much else to leverage as Pulock just signed an 8 year extension with a full NTC. Islanders are not a playoff team with their current forward group.
Just as an example but he was said to be very good when Ekblad was hurt last season and he's a UFA next yearHow good is Weegar at RD? His best showings have been him playing LD with Ekblad.
I think it's more likely that Dobson leads the Isles in points than that he gets traded for a forward.He is by far the Islanders best asset to get an impact forward. They really don’t have much else to leverage as Pulock just signed an 8 year extension with a full NTC. Islanders are not a playoff team with their current forward group.
Full NTC for the next 5 years then a 16 team NTC for the last 3.Pulocks NTC doesn’t kick in until year 3 of his 8 year contract if I’m recalling correctly
I get that there is literally less than 1% chance they would move him. My point still stands they are not a playoff team as currently constructed.I think it's more likely that Dobson leads the Isles in points than that he gets traded for a forward.
But why do the Isles want to move on from Dobson? I know why we want him but don't see motivation the other way. That is the part most are questioning.How about
To NYI
Batherson + top 3 protected 1st + Zaitsev
To Ottawa
Dobson + Bailey
Both Batherson and Dobson are on great contracts for now.
Bailey and Zaitsev are a complete wash but could fill the holes left from Bath and Dobson.
I don't think trading their best player (goalie aside), who only makes 4 mil a year, solves this perceived issue.Full NTC for the next 5 years then a 16 team NTC for the last 3.
I get that there is literally less than 1% chance they would move him. My point still stands they are not a playoff team as currently constructed.
I was questioning why you would think the Sens might have evaluated Dobson higher than Sanderson when in their respective draft years. Maybe I misunderstood what you were askingSeems like you're agreeing? Is it just the second "+" you object to?
At the end of the day, one in the hand is worth two in the bush. Maybe eventually Sanderson will surpass Dobson but for now dobson's floor (nhl star) is exponentially higher than Sanderson's.
You weren't quoting me. I was just pointing out that you seemed to be agreeing with the OP.I was questioning why you would think the Sens might have evaluated Dobson higher than Sanderson when in their respective draft years. Maybe I misunderstood what you were asking
I do agree it would take more than Sanderson to get Dobson
I could see the sens being similarly high on Dobson in their respective draft years, had Tkachuk been picked by the Habs at 3 OA, I could easily see us drafting Dobson 4th that year.I was questioning why you would think the Sens might have evaluated Dobson higher than Sanderson when in their respective draft years. Maybe I misunderstood what you were asking
I do agree it would take more than Sanderson to get Dobson
I’m not saying they would want to move on from him. I’m saying the team won’t score and they don’t really have any real assets to get an impact forward. Maybe they could package a couple firsts and Whalstrom to Chicago for Kane @ 50% retained but they would also need to dump salary which will cost as well.But why do the Isles want to move on from Dobson? I know why we want him but don't see motivation the other way. That is the part most are questioning.
Also don't see them taking a young, cost controlled, top pairing RD for a year or 2 of Kane.
You are probably right they could use more scoring but hard pressed for them to think moving Dobson is the best option.
I guess some people have a lot of idle time! Realistically there's less than a 1% chance the Sens could trade for him.We are talking about a trade for Dobson now? I must have missed something. Seems odd given that the Islanders just signed him to a contract.
Training camps still are almost 3 weeks off. Certainly lots of time to put deals together before the start of the season.I doubt anyone actually thinks we can get Dobson
It just a bit frustrating that we started the summer with "ok, we are going to get a top 4d" and we ended up not doing so. We got two great forwards so that's good but we all know our D needs a lot of help.
The Senators could make a trade for Dobson but they would have to overpay. I prefer to sign a UFA or trade for a soon-to-be UFA with a right to negotiate a long term contract prior to the trade. That would cost less in assets.I guess some people have a lot of idle time! Realistically there's less than a 1% chance the Sens could trade for him.
Training camps still are almost 3 weeks off. Certainly lots of time to put deals together before the start of the season.