Senscore
Let's keep it cold
- Nov 19, 2012
- 19,950
- 14,631
Honestly surprised something with Giroux hasn’t happened yet based on what I was told about things being worked on in the background.
Zetterlund might be a variable to consider now
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerHonestly surprised something with Giroux hasn’t happened yet based on what I was told about things being worked on in the background.
Crazy if he pans out after being a waiver pick up.I really want to sign Fabbro.
Next time I am at the game I'll look around for clues and get back to you.Honestly surprised something with Giroux hasn’t happened yet based on what I was told about things being worked on in the background.
Does would be solid.Any ideas for a 4C as a free agent? Someone like Eller, Faksa, Dowd, Bjugstad, Lazar, etc.
Ontario and Quebec are 53% while no tax states are around 39%. It’s a massive difference. Add in sales tax differences which reduces cost of living differences.Less than half that, + - 6%. The biggest discrepancy in the NHL is Seattle to Montreal which is an average tax rate of 43.4% vs 49.77%. Any other state vs any other province is less. *Source, I did the math for the 82 game schedule.
US federal tax + minor state taxes (like infrastructure tax) that people like to ignore + 41 away games that are taxed at local rates = less of a gap than people think. It's the most blown out of proportion flavour of the month debate in the NHL right now.
Factor in how far the US dollar goes in Canada (relative to the absurd cost of living in major US cities) and the 'tax free' advantage in places like Texas, Florida, Vegas and Washington is a complete mirage.
It makes no sense that people are even talking about it considering the factors at play and it's an excuse that needs to go away.
Now remove 41 games from that calculation.Ontario and Quebec are 53% while no tax states are around 39%. It’s a massive difference. Add in sales tax differences which reduces cost of living differences.
I wonder if there’s advantageous divisions? I’m thinking probably not since they’re split by time zone so you’re getting a mix of southern tax-free states with the northern states/provinces with higher taxes.Now remove 41 games from that calculation.
It’s complicated, especially when you add in deductions some players can get.
Example Auston Matthews pays less tax than a player playing in Florida.
Property taxes are crazy in Florida.
It it is still an advantageous.
The lowest 'no tax state' is Washington at 40.20% by the time you add a couple minor state levies on income. Quebec is 53.15%. But when you factor the 41 away games, where players pay tax in that jurisdiction, the average tax paid by a Kraken player goes up to 43.4% and the average tax paid by a Montreal player goes down to 49.77%, for an overall difference of 6.4%. This is based on the 2024-25 away schedule for both teams and Seattle / Montreal is the most extreme comparison.Ontario and Quebec are 53% while no tax states are around 39%. It’s a massive difference. Add in sales tax differences which reduces cost of living differences.
I’m curious as to why you ask this question? I lived in Texas for 6 years, although I was born, raised and have worked in Ontario. I hope you haven't assumed I don’t know the “state” tax advantages of Texas?How much do you think a player saves in taxes playing in Texas vs Ontario?
I spent 3 winters in Dallas and although I was able to comfortably play golf all winter long, I also experienced ice storms and cold(ish) weather.I’m curious as to why you ask this question? I lived in Texas for 6 years, although I was born, raised and have worked in Ontario. Do you think (assume) I don’t know the “state” tax advantages of Texas?
There would be a saving for the player based on no taxes for “home” games. The taxes for “away” games would be based on the tax jurisdiction the game is played in. So, there’s no simple, accurate answer that I could give other than what I have stated here AND in my original post that you responded to.
I merely commented on the “weather”, that’s all. I have found in the past that some Canadians think that people are outside & enjoying the amenable weather in Texas year round. In fact, Texans spend their time in their air-conditioned homes (offices, etc.) in the summer.
No worries mate. Yes, one winter a few years ago they had some snow & cold weather in the winter and many people were out of power for 4 days. I had a lot of wood for the fireplace, so I slept on a couch in front of the fireplace. The Texas electrical power grid and generation facilities were not robust enough to handle the snow & cold, so a lot of people had burst pipes and considerable water damage to their homes as a result.I spent 3 winters in Dallas and although I was able to comfortably play golf all winter long, I also experienced ice storms and cold(ish) weather.
Sorry if I misunderstood. Thought you were referencing the tax advantage which I believe is a lazy argument these days as I've outlined in other posts.
The tax advantage certainly exists, but it's probably not as big as it seems once you deal with things like home/away games, Signing bonuses for non-residents, RCA packages, and other mitigation strategies.Ontario and Quebec are 53% while no tax states are around 39%. It’s a massive difference. Add in sales tax differences which reduces cost of living differences.
speaking of which....I spent 3 winters in Dallas and although I was able to comfortably play golf all winter long, I also experienced ice storms and cold(ish) weather.
Yep just started up the generator, just in case.speaking of which....
In Ottawa? Im out west, out of the loop. Crazy.speaking of which....
Adam Larsson has an albatross contract, a dman who can't move a puck to save his life. No thank you. Kovacevic just got signed. I'm looking at Fabbro.I see the Sens at about $88 million for next season, including reasonable estimates for Zetterlund, Kleven, Matinpalo, and Merilainen (RFAs), Giroux, and 2 new 4th liners (UFAs).
Since Jensen has only 1 year until RFA, and he'll be 35, I'd like to sign a solid defensive #4 RHD UFA.
I like having 10 top 9 forwards, would like to have 5 top 4 defensemen. With everyone healthy, a bottom pairing of Kleven-Jensen, along with Matinpalo as #7 would be nice. We'd have 3 balanced pairings, each with a defensive guy paired with a great skater.
The cap will be $95.5 mil next year, so we certainly can sign someone for $5-6 million.
What suitable UFA RHDs will be available?
Adam Larsson would be my ideal candidate. A solid defender, certainly upgrades our #4, and we know Swedes like the lifestyle and weather in Ottawa.
Maybe Neal Pionk, if he wants better weather and a more exciting city? But American, so would take an overpay. He is better than Larsson.
Lesser RHD available are Fabbro, Perbix, and Kovacevic.
If Giroux retires, freeing up $, maybe go after Ekblad, although I don't see him leaving Florida for Ottawa without a substantial overpay.
Larsson's contract is up, he's UFA. Maybe we get a reasonable deal. I only care if he can defend (don't follow Seattle, so I can't speak for that), Chabot would do the puck moving in pair 2.Adam Larsson has an albatross contract, a dman who can't move a puck to save his life. No thank you. Kovacevic just got signed. I'm looking at Fabbro.
He re-signed with the Kraken. It's an albatross.Larsson's contract is up, he's UFA. Maybe we get a reasonable deal. I only care if he can defend (don't follow Seattle, so I can't speak for that), Chabot would do the puck moving in pair 2.
I think ideally, we'd get Pionk, which would be very difficult.
I don’t see the 88 million possible.I see the Sens at about $88 million for next season, including reasonable estimates for Zetterlund, Kleven, Matinpalo, and Merilainen (RFAs), Giroux, and 2 new 4th liners (UFAs).
Since Jensen has only 1 year until RFA, and he'll be 35, I'd like to sign a solid defensive #4 RHD UFA.
I like having 10 top 9 forwards, would like to have 5 top 4 defensemen. With everyone healthy, a bottom pairing of Kleven-Jensen, along with Matinpalo as #7 would be nice. We'd have 3 balanced pairings, each with a defensive guy paired with a great skater.
The cap will be $95.5 mil next year, so we certainly can sign someone for $5-6 million.
What suitable UFA RHDs will be available?
Adam Larsson would be my ideal candidate. A solid defender, certainly upgrades our #4, and we know Swedes like the lifestyle and weather in Ottawa.
Maybe Neal Pionk, if he wants better weather and a more exciting city? But American, so would take an overpay. He is better than Larsson.
Lesser RHD available are Fabbro, Perbix, and Kovacevic.
If Giroux retires, freeing up $, maybe go after Ekblad, although I don't see him leaving Florida for Ottawa without a substantial overpay.
Absolutely!Rob DiMaio deserves his flowers
I used PuckPedia, but noticed I missed White and Korpisalo.
Here's my breakdown, I'm rounding numbers, I'll add in the buyouts this time...
8 Forwards... $42.2 mil
4 Defense... $24.7 mil
1 Goalie... $8.3 mil
Buyouts... $1.9 mil
Total signed... $77.1 mil
RFAs
Zetterlund $2.4 mil
Kleven $1.3 mil
Matinpalo $1 mil
Merilainen $1.2 mil
UFAs
Giroux $4 mil (same as Perron, they are comparable)
Total $87.1 mil (10F, 6D, 2G)
Need 3F: let's say 3 guys making $800,000, like Cousins, Gregor, Gaudette, Highmore = $2.4 mil.
Total $89.5 mil.
This is 13 forwards, 6D, and 2G = 21 players. I'm assuming we add a RHD like discussed, giving a 22 man roster. I'll also leave $800,000 for when callups are needed (23rd man), whether it be F, D, or G.
$95.5 mil - $89.5 mil - 800K = $5.2 mil left over.
So, there is $5.2 mil available to sign a RHD. Those darn buyouts! Maybe we can shave another $400K off of the RFAs, yielding $5.6 remaining?