Tanev... Dumba... these options are not giving me the warm and fuzzies that our pro scouting is any better. Tanev is good but aging quickly. Dumba is not good.
Overall Chychrun is much better than Dumba. Chychrun is a legit top 4 D.. even with some short comings defensively.I'd rather keep Chychrun on the right than go after Dumba.
Admittedly I haven't watched aritthis year, shocker I know.Dumba is a bad, bad D who is getting worse quickly.
Would legit rather sign a bottom of the barrel UFA for a year for cheap.
Chych at 8 on the Right can’t be a thing. Doesn’t need to be one or the other. Just do neither.
Putting that slot and 4 million into Dumba would be horrible for the Sens as a team.
Pretty sure Kubalik would be gone if we could give him away. Likely we have to pay teams to take him now and at that point we may as well keep him. Maybe someone has some injuries before the deadline, or we can include him as a dump in a bigger deal.2 people that really needs to be off this Team are Kubalik (asap) and Chychrun (or just make him a forward)
Pretty sure Kubalik would be gone if we could give him away. Likely we have to pay teams to take him now and at that point we may as well keep him. Maybe someone has some injuries before the deadline, or we can include him as a dump in a bigger deal.
Hopefully misdirection so they swoop in and grab Matt Roy.Tanev... Dumba... these options are not giving me the warm and fuzzies that our pro scouting is any better. Tanev is good but aging quickly. Dumba is not good.
I think 3x3 is a good deal for Dumba and allows you to keep chych at 7.5 for 8.What would Dumba cost to extend, maybe 4 mil, possibly less if we give him some term?
If Chychrun is going to cost 8 or something close to it, and you can have Dumba at 4 along with someone else at 4, does than change things?
Not for me, personally, but certainly cost is a factor. I don't want to nickel and dime it expecting similar results though. If we're being realistic, even with Chychrun out of position, it would be downgrading the player significantly.What would Dumba cost to extend, maybe 4 mil, possibly less if we give him some term?
If Chychrun is going to cost 8 or something close to it, and you can have Dumba at 4 along with someone else at 4, does than change things?
I agree. Chychrun or no Chychrun, Dumba is not the answer. He's the PD bargain bin type solution, not something this team should be expected to thrive with, imo.Overall Chychrun is much better than Dumba. Chychrun is a legit top 4 D.. even with some short comings defensively.
I think Dumba is a bottom pair D at this point and he's paid too much for that.
Same money I would take him over Hamonic. I would not trade JBD for Dumba because JBD is trending up and Dumba is trending down. We need to do better than Dumba. We need someone that can play in the top 4 and be reliable.
Pro scouting needs to be addressed in Ottawa imo. If these guys are scanning the league and coming up with Dumba.. true he is an option out there but not a good one. Maybe Bruce is just full of it anyway on this.
I don't see it as ego .. you may not agree with his ideas of roster construction. If the intent is to move on from Chychrun and in the same or a corresponding to improve the Right side D to run a solid top 4 on both sides I have zero issue with that concept.Staois is gonna f*** ip a good thing bc of his own ego. But the correct move is keeping chych. 3 LDs give you flexibility.
You can make your move for a RD when the time is right. You can have a top 4 d with a discount at 7.5 and he plays his offside. Like many do.
I have to say staois’s obsession with moving a D is already making me dislike him.
It's not ego, it's being smartI don't see it as ego .. you may not agree with his ideas of roster construction. If the intent is to move on from Chychrun and in the same or a corresponding to improve the Right side D to run a solid top 4 on both sides I have zero issue with that concept.
The Sens are missing 1 legit top 4 RD. They'll have to pay for that player. The money allocation changes from paying 3 LD and 1 RD to paying 2 LD and 2 RD.
Dumba has been extremely physical lately. He had a slow start to the season and Yotes fans were frustrated for the first couple of months. Since then, he’s been good. And has been a menace physically. His hit volume isn’t that high, but he’s been throwing monster hits and getting opposing teams rattled and off their games. He still gets booed every time he touches the puck in Dallas. That’s the kind of impact he had in the playoffs. They still haven’t forgotten.Dumba isn’t bad in his own end. He just isn’t physical or offensive anymore. He’s just like a dimelo. But can log big minutes and who knows maybe sometimes he can be meaner. I’d take him in a heartbeat. Don’t believe the narrative. He is good. Give him a watch.
Card matches the eye test for me
I’d take Demelo over him easily.
Yes that is ultimately it and that is the function of the board obviously as well. I get that.I don't see it as ego .. you may not agree with his ideas of roster construction. If the intent is to move on from Chychrun and in the same or a corresponding to improve the Right side D to run a solid top 4 on both sides I have zero issue with that concept.
The Sens are missing 1 legit top 4 RD. They'll have to pay for that player. The money allocation changes from paying 3 LD and 1 RD to paying 2 LD and 2 RD.
Exactly. Whoever gets him as a 4/5 is gonna be happy. He’s the guy we need. We keep chych and sign him. You have a solid solid D corps that has depth.Dumba has been extremely physical lately. He had a slow start to the season and Yotes fans were frustrated for the first couple of months. Since then, he’s been good. And has been a menace physically. His hit volume isn’t that high, but he’s been throwing monster hits and getting opposing teams rattled and off their games. He still gets booed every time he touches the puck in Dallas. That’s the kind of impact he had in the playoffs. They still haven’t forgotten.
I like Dumba but I don’t think he has much value. Maybe a 3rd round pick? Arizona is honestly swimming in picks and can’t possibly sign all of them. So I don’t know what a good fit would be? Is there a player swap to be had? I get the impression you’re all sick of Kastelic. Does that make sense?
Excuse me, why are we divesting assets at the deadline for a UFA?Dumba 3.9M for Brannstrom+Kubalik 4.5M.
That is close to cap and salary neutral when you factor in that it is 2 bodies for 1, and Arizona would send a 2-way contract down to make room for Kubalik. Sending down a 2 way contract bridges the 600k gap.
Gives Arizona a chance to test drive Brannstrom and either qualify him or let him walk. The same with Ottawa and Dumba.
I think he will likely be dealt to the leafs with no help and will be in the same UFA spot he was last year.I like Dumba but I don’t think he has much value. Maybe a 3rd round pick? Arizona is honestly swimming in picks and can’t possibly sign all of them. So I don’t know what a good fit would be? Is there a player swap to be had? I get the impression you’re all sick of Kastelic. Does that make sense?
I just don’t think Arizona would want those players.
Dumba and 39th overall for 30th overall?
Value adds up as it's essentially 39th + a 4th for 30th, but the Sens shouldn't be trading down to add a guy like DumbaI just don’t think Arizona would want those players.
Dumba and 39th overall for 30th overall?