BondraTime
Registered User
They'd like the 2nd, would likely not want Brann though, would rather a prospect or another pickBrannstrom + 2nd for Tanev?
They'd like the 2nd, would likely not want Brann though, would rather a prospect or another pickBrannstrom + 2nd for Tanev?
I don't like the idea of trading for an upcoming UFA. If we are going to sign a guy like Roy or Tanev it's probably going to require a dumb overpayment, which is something that's hard enough to swallow on July 1st let alone giving up a quality asset for the privilege.
LA being interested in Chychrun isn't a surprise though. They are starting to realize goaltending may be an issue and no good goalies seem to be available. Only solution then is to add a good defenseman.
Absolutely love Roy. I doubt they're giving up Clarke though. Roy + 1st gets it done for me.Brandt Clarke and Matt Roy for Chychrun would be sweet. We can explore the possibility of re-signing Roy but if we decide to walk away we still get Clarke. They can have Boucher if it seals the deal.
Brandt Clarke and Matt Roy for Chychrun would be sweet. We can explore the possibility of re-signing Roy but if we decide to walk away we still get Clarke. They can have Boucher if it seals the deal.
John Tavares lolHold onto your balls:
To Ottawa:
2024 1st
2026 1st
Matthew Knies
John Tavares
To Toronto:
Josh Norris
Chychrun
Brannstrom
If they ever traded Clarke it would be because they don't want to let Roy walk and think Spence will be able to nail down the 3rd pairing RD role long-term.
I'd gladly retain 50% on Chychrun in an attempt to steal Clarke from them. May even throw something extra.
Still pissed we won the last game of the year in 2020/21. Made our pick drop from 8th to 10th. Clarke would be a Senator right now if not for that.
Good old alberta boy like JBDThey'd like the 2nd, would likely not want Brann though, would rather a prospect or another pick
If they ever traded Clarke it would be because they don't want to let Roy walk and think Spence will be able to nail down the 3rd pairing RD role long-term.
I'd gladly retain 50% on Chychrun in an attempt to steal Clarke from them. May even throw something extra.
Still pissed we won the last game of the year in 2020/21. Made our pick drop from 8th to 10th. Clarke would be a Senator right now if not for that.
Not sure what you mean by "signed"? I'm guessing you mean they are under contract this year???Trade Deadline:
To Philly: Kubalik LW & Korpisalo G ($6.5 mil out)
To Ott: Laughton LW & Walker RD ($5.65 mil in) (signed)
To Car: Tarasenko RW ($5 mil out)
To Ott: Pesce RD ($4.025 mil in) (signed)
is there a path where we just keep Chychrun? He seems to be doing well with Chabby under Martin now
Is there a path forward where we just get a lower cap RD like a David Savard with 1mill retained and send Branny, JBD and Hamonic packing? Could then put Kleven and instantly you have a lot more size and grit on the blue line while still having a lot of skill?
Bringing in Roy but getting rid of Chychrun seems like a heavy downgrade to me
Good old alberta boy like JBD
LOL. IF you're talking about Montreal sending money to the Jets, I don't think Jets ownership really needs help.Montreal will send them a couple million to bankroll operations next year
Interesting, but I'd really like to know if an extension is being discussed. Senators going for a pure rental at this point would be kind of weird. Not sure if that kind of (extension) info will be available. Don't think including Brannstrom will be that appealing to Calgary though.Brannstrom + 2nd for Tanev?
Not to take focus away from Melnyk and Dorion and how awful they were, but I'm sure Dorion could have gotten a 1st for Stone. He just valued Brannstrom - who was at his peak value - more highly.
Most of these owners are rich.LOL. IF you're talking about Montreal sending money to the Jets, I don't think Jets ownership really needs help.
David Thomson info below.
Winnipeg Jets’ David Thomson listed as fourth richest sports franchise owner in the world at $52 billion
Winnipeg Jets fans shouldn’t be too concerned about the team's owners running out of money any time soon. Read more.winnipegsun.com
Okay but why lol. He’s a free agent in 6 months.Brannstrom + 2nd for Tanev?
Thanks for sharing but how do we have an extension in place but Tanev said no?Take this with a grain and salt. I read in another forum that we have an agreement with Calgary, with an extension in place. But Tanev politely declined
Think he means an offer with a contract extension was provided but Tanev rejected it.Thanks for sharing but how do we have an extension in place but Tanev said no?
I mean we offer him an extension if accepted the deal but he declinedThanks for sharing but how do we have an extension in place but Tanev said no?
Too much for Laughton.Flyers possibly going to trade Scott Laughton.
He's someone I could see Staois being very interested in.
Signed for 2 more years at 3M. Can play C but is better at LW. Only 20P/50GP this year but had 43P/78GP last year.
Could see something based around Boucher + BOS 1st + more.
It's a move that does not make our team better. Trade Kubalik for Laughton!Moving Joseph for a 3rd line vet is the definition of a lateral move.
Too much for Laughton.