Proposal: - Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals - 2025/26 Part II | Page 362 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Proposal: Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals - 2025/26 Part II

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
If it's DeBrusk, I hope the prospect we draft at 32 is the most we pay.

If someone else overlays for him before that, let em go. Not overpaying and having assets for FA is still valuable
 
Anaheim fans have speculated that one of the reasons McTavish might be getting moved is that he “doesn’t fit the coaches fast paced and up tempo style of play”

That’s exactly how we play so that’s concerning
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NB613 and Boud
Anaheim fans have speculated that one of the reasons McTavish might be getting moved is that he “doesn’t fit the coaches fast paced and up tempo style of play”

That’s exactly how we play sontjays concerning
Part of why I have never taken rumours of our interest that seriously. Plus he's a C. Seems like he would need to change his game a lot to fit in here.
 
Anaheim fans have speculated that one of the reasons McTavish might be getting moved is that he “doesn’t fit the coaches fast paced and up tempo style of play”

That’s exactly how we play sontjays concerning

He skates as well as Tkachuk did.

It's not a strength, but if you were to pair him with Stutzle/Batherson, he'd be fine as the net front down low garbage guy. His best attribute are his hands around the net.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJB
Outside of Ullmark (maybe Foegle?), it seems like the players Staois has brought in have been out of left field. Cozens, Zetterlund, Jensen, Eklund. We need to be thinking outside of the box. We need a #1 LW who has shooters mentality.

Alex DeBrincat. Only one year left on his deal but I'm sure he'd extend.
 
Not a lot of first liners are available unless you want to trade Stutzle or Sanderson.

Like, what are these absurd expectations?
Pettersson (retained) and Mctavish both avaliable and both much superior options

Debrusk is a 40-45 point winger who is going to be 30 when the season starts. What are we talking about here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: L'Aveuglette
Outside of Ullmark (maybe Foegle?), it seems like the players Staois has brought in have been out of left field. Cozens, Zetterlund, Jensen, Eklund. We need to be thinking outside of the box. We need a #1 LW who has shooters mentality.

Alex DeBrincat. Only one year left on his deal but I'm sure he'd extend.
Look for a tough 4th liner, RD.
 
Outside of Ullmark (maybe Foegle?), it seems like the players Staois has brought in have been out of left field. Cozens, Zetterlund, Jensen, Eklund. We need to be thinking outside of the box. We need a #1 LW who has shooters mentality.

Alex DeBrincat. Only one year left on his deal but I'm sure he'd extend.
Eklund was avaliable last deadline as they tried to move him for Nemec. Def unexpected but he was in rumours. Cozens was also avaliable
 
Pettersson (retained) and Mctavish both avaliable and both much superior options

Debrusk is a 40-45 point winger who is going to be 30 when the season starts. What are we talking about here?
Debrusk had more goals and points than McTavish last year. He makes half of what Pettersson does.
 
Definitely don't want to pay what the Canucks will want for DeBrusk (likely #25+) but on the other hand this forward group is damn sexy:

Eklund - Stutzle - DeBrusk
Greig - Cozens - Batherson
Zetterlund - Pinto - Amadio
Foegele - Halliday - Giroux
running a first line with Eklund and Debrusk (40-45 point winger who thrives mostly on the PP) and calling it sexy is wild
 
Debrusk had more goals and points than McTavish last year. He makes half of what Pettersson does.
Mctavish is a better option due to his potential and the way he plays. he goes to the middle of the ice and will score around the net and tip in pucks more of a PF

Mctavish is 23 and Debrusk is going to be 30 when the season starts. I mean the differences in potential is obvious
 
  • Like
Reactions: Senator Stanley
Eklund was avaliable last deadline as they tried to move him for Nemec. Def unexpected but he was in rumours. Cozens was also avaliable
Cozens was available for sure but we never really got linked to him. It’s true that with this regime if a player is mentioned repeatedly as being of interest to us it’s probably not who we’re gonna land on.
 
Mctavish is a better option due to his potential and the way he plays. he goes to the middle of the ice and will score around the net and tip in pucks more of a PF

Mctavish is 23 and Debrusk is going to be 30 when the season starts. I mean the differences in potential is obvious
Yes to McTavish. Exactly what we need. 25th, Florida 1st in 2029 and let's f***ing go.
 
Cozens was available for sure but we never really got linked to him. It’s true that with this regime if a player is mentioned repeatedly as being of interest to us it’s probably not who we’re gonna land on.
Ye don't think anyone thought that Buffalo would actually want Norris with his injury history. I remember a lot of the talk then around sens land was that norris was not super moveable
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayOn

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad