Ducks DVM
sowcufucakky
He makes 3.65M for another 2 years. What kind of a return do you think that’ll bring in a flat cap world, and do you think that will offset the damage it will do to signing more UFA’s?I wouldn't want a 3rd round pick.
He makes 3.65M for another 2 years. What kind of a return do you think that’ll bring in a flat cap world, and do you think that will offset the damage it will do to signing more UFA’s?I wouldn't want a 3rd round pick.
Something useful, maybe packaged for a defensive defensemen, younger player, someone with some grit and size. Who knows the possibilities are endless.He makes 3.65M for another 2 years. What kind of a return do you think that’ll bring in a flat cap world, and do you think that will offset the damage it will do to signing more UFA’s?
Yeah, that’s not really an answer. That’s just mystery wishboxing. Provide actual names and targets that you would expect for a middle 6 complementary wing with 2 years remaining paying 3.625M, because the possibilities for that type of player in this cap climate are absolutely not endless.Something useful, maybe packaged for a defensive defensemen, younger player, someone with some grit and size. Who knows the possibilities are endless.
Id trade him for a Comtois type player on another team with the hope he fits better here and reaches a little more potential... That's cheaper. Someone with physically and at least some size and some scoring upside.... Sometimes a change of scenery can unlock a little more.Yeah, that’s not really an answer. That’s just mystery wishboxing. Provide actual names and targets that you would expect for a middle 6 complementary wing with 2 years remaining paying 3.625M, because the possibilities for that type of player in this cap climate are absolutely not endless.
For example - Players who meet your wish list - Kulikov, Comtois, Jones.
And also, not to mention, Milano was said by management to have locker room and work ethic problems , we didn’t need someone like that back. It’s irrelevant what he’s doing in Washington. Jake and Felix and anyone else that keeps bringing this pos up, should have a random stranger hit them in their balls the next time they go shopping imho.Like I said before, Vatrano is doing what he was brought in for and he is doing it very well. I still think he is a better all around player than Milano.
I thought the locker room and work ethic problems was speculation based on his time in Columbus with Torts. Was that a problem with us? If so, it probably wasn't a good idea for Z to have him as a roommate.And also, not to mention, Milano was said by management to have locker room and work ethic problems , we didn’t need someone like that back. It’s irrelevant what he’s doing in Washington. Jake and Felix and anyone else that keeps bringing this pos up, should have a random stranger hit them in their balls the next time they go shopping imho.
Legit link/source? I'm going to guess now there isn't one. I don't miss him at all and everyone here knows I felt about his turnovers and overall meh play but I'm calling fake news on this.And also, not to mention, Milano was said by management to have locker room and work ethic problems , we didn’t need someone like that back. It’s irrelevant what he’s doing in Washington. Jake and Felix and anyone else that keeps bringing this pos up, should have a random stranger hit them in their balls the next time they go shopping imho.
I remember stephens dif an article hinting about that. Don’t have links, just remember it throughlyI thought the locker room and work ethic problems was speculation based on his time in Columbus with Torts. Was that a problem with us? If so, it probably wasn't a good idea for Z to have him as a roommate.
And also, not to mention, Milano was said by management to have locker room and work ethic problems , we didn’t need someone like that back. It’s irrelevant what he’s doing in Washington. Jake and Felix and anyone else that keeps bringing this pos up, should have a random stranger hit them in their balls the next time they go shopping imho.
Really finding his stride here now, kinda crazy we're still mostly using him in the bottom 6. 11 points in his last 10 games now up to 29 points in 57 games this year.
I kind of disagree with this. The only real change is the shots are going in now. The first half of the season he was shooting like 4% or something absurd and the percentages are evening out to career norms.I think Eakins finally figured out that he plays better down in the lineup. I don’t know but for whatever reason, he just wasn’t working in the top 6. He’s best suited going against bottom pairing dmen.
Very solid player
Solid pickup.
Like his game, one of the few guys who play with an edge.
Give him an elite passing center.. He could pot 25-30.. His shots are deadlyUp to 41 points on the year, a career high for him, tied for the team lead in goals with 22. Been everything he was paid to be and then some and has gotten better and better, really makes you wonder what he’d be producing if we had a half decent team.
Up to 41 points on the year, a career high for him, tied for the team lead in goals with 22. Been everything he was paid to be and then some and has gotten better and better, really makes you wonder what he’d be producing if we had a half decent team.
We need better defense from the whole team.. That comes with a new coach to teach these guys how to defend as a unit... All the do is scramble all over the ice.. Worst defensive team ever..Odd thing to bring up. Vatrano has been on better teams, playoff teams. With Anaheim, he's probably playing up higher in the lineup and getting more scoring chances. Or we can attribute his scoring to Eakins' run-n-gun style offense?
I'm not as enamored with Vatrano's play overall. As much as I like him scoring a lot, I would also like better defense. I really do like his bulldog mentality, something the team needs.
- Vatrano has 41 points in 79 games (0.52 ppg) with a -28 rating. A goal differential of +13.
- Rookie McTavish has 42 points in 79 games (0.53 ppg) with a -19 rating. A goal differential of +23.
- Old man Rico has 37 points in 60 games (0.62 ppg) with a -8 rating. A goal differential of +29.
We need better defense from Vatrano, at least equal defense to that of rookie McTavish. Yet, look at Rico's goal differential production (points + plus/minus rating). Vatrano's tied for 2nd worst plus/minus rating of -28 with Klingberg. The worst is Stroke with -29.