dracom
Registered User
What you're saying is essentially an appeal to authority. Do you disagree that Bieksa and Stoner were given terrible contracts? If you don't then you concede that these "professionals" are capable of making mistakes when judging talent. From which it follows that rating Fowler so high could be mistake by the ducks brass.
I would take Manson over Fowler. Manson > Fowler
Your last sentence shows no one should listen to your opinion about Ducks players.