Former Canucks Thread 2023-24 Off-Season Edition

thecupismine

Registered User
Apr 1, 2007
2,577
1,754
You are rewriting history and ignoring actual facts. It wasn't till 3 season ago that McCann actual put his shit together and the number 1 D is Gustov? He is not a number 1 D.. he is good but you ignore it took 7 years from his draft year to actual show he was any good. Hawks and Carolina let him go as well. How many teams dud McCann play on before he put solid numbers together?

McCann became a solid middle six player 4 years out from his draft which is reasonable for a late first round pick, and then blossomed into a bona-fide top 6 player in 2020. We gave up on him 2 years after his draft, along with more draft picks, for a replacement level dman because he's "big." That's hardly revisionist history, that's just poor management.

Forsling was traded after a good draft +1 season for a AHL tweener who's numbers had gone down year over year because of the "age gap." The deal made no sense then and looks asinine now.

Thinking Ekblad is the number 1 in Florida right now makes me think you didn't watch much Panthers hockey last year, or aren't particularly good at player evaluation. Forsling is a modern day Mattias Ohlund, guy just eats minutes for the Panthers and wins his matchups much more consistently than Ekblad.

Of course, no one knew back when the deals were made that they would turn out THIS terribly, but the point is these guys were progressing at a reasonable rate & were dealt for negative assets, while we held on forever to stalling/negative assets.

When you have a couple 30%ers, and deal them for 10%ers, that's poor management, regardless of how each panned out.
 

Jyrki21

2021-12-05
Sponsor
before my time, but i did have a misprinted pro set joe nieuwendyk that they fixed very quickly so it was supposed to be fairly rare

beckett had it listed at $5

and check it out, it’s held its value

View attachment 920395
That Pro Set line had a bunch of errors, with the one I remember most being their NJ mixup of Peter Stastny and Patrik Sundström:

2-x-stastny-peter-patrik-sundstrom-proset-1990-91-chybotlac-177350255.jpeg
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,489
6,378
McCann became a solid middle six player 4 years out from his draft which is reasonable for a late first round pick, and then blossomed into a bona-fide top 6 player in 2020. We gave up on him 2 years after his draft, along with more draft picks, for a replacement level dman because he's "big." That's hardly revisionist history, that's just poor management.
That deal was more nuanced than that though. Gudbranson was a "big" 24 year-old RHD coming off a season where he logged over 26 minutes in the playoffs. Gudbranson didn't improve and wasn't/isn't very good but he clearly brought perceived traits that hoodwinked other GMs including our current POHO. So while we can argue about whether he is "replacement level" he clearly wasn't seen as one or utilized as one. He's clearly enjoyed career where he's been utilized as a #5/#4. Poor pro scouting? Sure. Bad methodology (giving up McCann to acquire a 24 year old RHD coming off a relatively strong playoffs logging over 25 minutes)? Not really.

As for McCann, we kind of knew we were potentially giving up a top 6 player though. It wasn't a situation where we thought that he probably wouldn't make it. Plus if you have to be technical, he was traded for a failed prospect and a 7th round pick and wasn't protected in the expansion draft.
 

RandV

It's a wolf v2.0
Jul 29, 2003
27,022
5,138
Vancouver
Visit site
That deal was more nuanced than that though. Gudbranson was a "big" 24 year-old RHD coming off a season where he logged over 26 minutes in the playoffs. Gudbranson didn't improve and wasn't/isn't very good but he clearly brought perceived traits that hoodwinked other GMs including our current POHO. So while we can argue about whether he is "replacement level" he clearly wasn't seen as one or utilized as one. He's clearly enjoyed career where he's been utilized as a #5/#4. Poor pro scouting? Sure. Bad methodology (giving up McCann to acquire a 24 year old RHD coming off a relatively strong playoffs logging over 25 minutes)? Not really.
I always like to point out here that this was a 6 game series with a lot of overtime. Just doing a quick double check the top 4 of Ekblad/Campbell/Kulikov/Gudbranson all average over 25 minutes that playoffs. The #5/6 logged 21:41 and 19:55 respectively.

I think the most important thing though is that we could have just resigned Hamhuis, instead of letting him walk for nothing then paying a heft price for Gudbranson.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,489
6,378
I always like to point out here that this was a 6 game series with a lot of overtime. Just doing a quick double check the top 4 of Ekblad/Campbell/Kulikov/Gudbranson all average over 25 minutes that playoffs. The #5/6 logged 21:41 and 19:55 respectively.

And Gudbranson logged the most minutes of the top 4. Regardless, that's not just ice time without context though. By most accounts Gudbranson had a strong playoffs. He also logged 20+ minutes in the regular season.

I think the most important thing though is that we could have just resigned Hamhuis, instead of letting him walk for nothing then paying a heft price for Gudbranson.

I don't see how that is mutually exclusive though. Hamhuis was an LHD. Gudbranson was an RHD. The mistake was not consummating the trade with Dallas or another team when we had the chance. Hamhuis was also turning 34 when he left here.
 

RobertKron

Registered User
Sep 1, 2007
16,012
9,596
Holy f*** are we really going back into the Gudbranson playoff series saga?
Guys, Mitchell tweeted or whatever about how upset he was about the trade!!! Tweeted an acronym for a swear!!! On the internet!!!! That's how we know they're getting a good defenseman! You gotta trust Willie Mitchell's judgement and integrity in all things!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: AlainVigneaultsGum

LordBacon

CEO of sh*tposting
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2017
8,928
11,743
Hong Kong
Holy f*** are we really going back into the Gudbranson playoff series saga?
Guys, Mitchell tweeted or whatever about how upset he was about the trade!!! Tweeted an acronym for a swear!!! On the internet!!!! That's how we know they're getting a good defenseman!
I cant give likes right now so...

take my written like instead.
 
  • Love
Reactions: AlainVigneaultsGum

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,489
6,378
Holy f*** are we really going back into the Gudbranson playoff series saga?
Guys, Mitchell tweeted or whatever about how upset he was about the trade!!! Tweeted an acronym for a swear!!! On the internet!!!! That's how we know they're getting a good defenseman! You gotta trust Willie Mitchell's judgement and integrity in all things!!!

Not my fault for participating in
:deadhorse
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,637
11,533
That deal was more nuanced than that though. Gudbranson was a "big" 24 year-old RHD coming off a season where he logged over 26 minutes in the playoffs. Gudbranson didn't improve and wasn't/isn't very good but he clearly brought perceived traits that hoodwinked other GMs including our current POHO. So while we can argue about whether he is "replacement level" he clearly wasn't seen as one or utilized as one. He's clearly enjoyed career where he's been utilized as a #5/#4. Poor pro scouting? Sure. Bad methodology (giving up McCann to acquire a 24 year old RHD coming off a relatively strong playoffs logging over 25 minutes)? Not really.

As for McCann, we kind of knew we were potentially giving up a top 6 player though. It wasn't a situation where we thought that he probably wouldn't make it. Plus if you have to be technical, he was traded for a failed prospect and a 7th round pick and wasn't protected in the expansion draft.
Gudbranson was only a 26 MPG guy in the playoffs because Florida played an extra 5 OT periods in a 6 game series, it was like Bubbles mentioned a lousy trade and use of asset management at the time.

Was looking at some prospects and came across the Omsk Avangard roster and there are 5 former Canucks on there.


91Linden VeyR196121812-21991-07-1733Wakaw, SASK6.02189
44Damir SharipzyanovD192161815-11996-02-1728Nizhnekamsk, Russia6.02211
66Semyon ChistyakovD197815432001-08-0723Nizhny Tagil, Russia5.11198
86Reid BoucherL1276131821993-09-0830Grand Ledge, MI5.10191
37Ilya ReingardtF195491282003-09-08206.01176
57Alexei MakeyevF184372-51991-11-2532Novouralsk, Russia5.09187
51Ryan SpoonerC81560-31992-01-3032Ottawa, ONT5.11198
12Alexander FilatyevF17325412004-01-28205.10169
2Pavel KoledovD19145031994-09-20296.01200
22Stanislav GalievL172244-21992-01-1732Moscow, Russia6.01196
4Darren DietzD1713410-81993-07-1731Medicine Hat, ALTA6.02209
14Ivan IgumnovF171340-21996-06-29285.10185
85Alexander YaremchukC170332-11999-08-22255.11191
70Igor MartynovL182136-11999-01-1925Krasnoye, Belarus5.11191
84Mikhail GulyayevD182130-12005-04-2619Novosibirsk, Russia5.10171
97Nikita KholodilinF1912317-32002-06-19226.02207
25Dmitry ZlodeevC180224-52002-02-1522Voronezh, Russia5.11182
24Alexey SolovyevD191122-71994-09-0829Moscow, Russia6.02202
11Ivan NikolishinL110114-21996-04-1228Hartford, CT5.09176
21Cole CasselsC150110-61995-05-0429Hartford, CT6.00194
92Artyom MurylyovD1000202002-08-25226.00183
76Daniil StepanovC3000002001-01-1223Minsk, Belarus6.00169
16Yegor ManinF30000-12000-06-25246.00160
78Pavel LeukaC30000-12003-05-15216.02203
5Ilya ProskuryakovG6000001987-02-2137Surgut, Russia6.02198
43Mark VerbaF60000-11998-02-02266.00182
96Sergei BoikovD1500012-31996-01-2428Khabarovsk, Russia6.01202
30Pavel KhomchenkoG17000001994-10-13296.01180
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bubbles

calnuck

Registered User
Nov 26, 2010
4,386
4,192
CA
Gudbranson was only a 26 MPG guy in the playoffs because Florida played an extra 5 OT periods in a 6 game series, it was like Bubbles mentioned a lousy trade and use of asset management at the time.

Was looking at some prospects and came across the Omsk Avangard roster and there are 5 former Canucks on there.


91Linden VeyR196121812-21991-07-1733Wakaw, SASK6.02189
44Damir SharipzyanovD192161815-11996-02-1728Nizhnekamsk, Russia6.02211
66Semyon ChistyakovD197815432001-08-0723Nizhny Tagil, Russia5.11198
86Reid BoucherL1276131821993-09-0830Grand Ledge, MI5.10191
37Ilya ReingardtF195491282003-09-08206.01176
57Alexei MakeyevF184372-51991-11-2532Novouralsk, Russia5.09187
51Ryan SpoonerC81560-31992-01-3032Ottawa, ONT5.11198
12Alexander FilatyevF17325412004-01-28205.10169
2Pavel KoledovD19145031994-09-20296.01200
22Stanislav GalievL172244-21992-01-1732Moscow, Russia6.01196
4Darren DietzD1713410-81993-07-1731Medicine Hat, ALTA6.02209
14Ivan IgumnovF171340-21996-06-29285.10185
85Alexander YaremchukC170332-11999-08-22255.11191
70Igor MartynovL182136-11999-01-1925Krasnoye, Belarus5.11191
84Mikhail GulyayevD182130-12005-04-2619Novosibirsk, Russia5.10171
97Nikita KholodilinF1912317-32002-06-19226.02207
25Dmitry ZlodeevC180224-52002-02-1522Voronezh, Russia5.11182
24Alexey SolovyevD191122-71994-09-0829Moscow, Russia6.02202
11Ivan NikolishinL110114-21996-04-1228Hartford, CT5.09176
21Cole CasselsC150110-61995-05-0429Hartford, CT6.00194
92Artyom MurylyovD1000202002-08-25226.00183
76Daniil StepanovC3000002001-01-1223Minsk, Belarus6.00169
16Yegor ManinF30000-12000-06-25246.00160
78Pavel LeukaC30000-12003-05-15216.02203
5Ilya ProskuryakovG6000001987-02-2137Surgut, Russia6.02198
43Mark VerbaF60000-11998-02-02266.00182
96Sergei BoikovD1500012-31996-01-2428Khabarovsk, Russia6.01202
30Pavel KhomchenkoG17000001994-10-13296.01180
Man, Cole Cassels, what could have been...
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast

Jyrki21

2021-12-05
Sponsor
Was looking at some prospects and came across the Omsk Avangard roster and there are 5 former Canucks on there.

11Ivan NikolishinL110114-21996-04-1228Hartford, CT5.09176
21Cole CasselsC150110-61995-05-0429Hartford, CT6.00194

^^ This is super-random too -- you have two sons of Whalers ending up there, giving you back-to-back Hartford birthplaces in the middle of Siberia.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,489
6,378
Gudbranson was only a 26 MPG guy in the playoffs because Florida played an extra 5 OT periods in a 6 game series, it was like Bubbles mentioned a lousy trade and use of asset management at the time.
Gudbranson led all Panthers' defensemen in ice time in the playoffs that year. Whether he would have logged less than 26 minutes a game but for OT is not very relevant. He also logged over 20+ minutes in the regular season.

Again, we can argue over pro scouting etc. but suggesting that we traded McCann + for what the league perceived as a replacement level asset is disingenuous.

"In Erik’s case he’s a real heart and soul guy. He’s a good dressing room guy. He’s got good character. He can protect our players, he puts us in stronger position to push back when we get into more physical games.

As you know, there’s some teams just play a skating, skill game. There are some teams that play physical. He’s going to bring that element that will help us."
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,637
11,533
Gudbranson led all Panthers' defensemen in ice time in the playoffs that year. Whether he would have logged less than 26 minutes a game but for OT is not very relevant. He also logged over 20+ minutes in the regular season.

Again, we can argue over pro scouting etc. but suggesting that we traded McCann + for what the league perceived as a replacement level asset is disingenuous.

"In Erik’s case he’s a real heart and soul guy. He’s a good dressing room guy. He’s got good character. He can protect our players, he puts us in stronger position to push back when we get into more physical games.

As you know, there’s some teams just play a skating, skill game. There are some teams that play physical. He’s going to bring that element that will help us."
Sure all of that is great but we were an aging team basically spinning our wheels and the addition of basically a guy who had similar value to a 38 year old Willie Mitchell at the expense of a recent first rounder who played in the NHL with junior eligibility left + a second rounder is reaching when there was zero reason for it.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,489
6,378
Sure all of that is great but we were an aging team basically spinning our wheels and the addition of basically a guy who had similar value to a 38 year old Willie Mitchell at the expense of a recent first rounder who played in the NHL with junior eligibility left + a second rounder is reaching when there was zero reason for it.

Are you talking about Gudbranson's value at the time of the trade? If you're saying that Gudbranson at 24 years old coming off the season he did had similar value to a 38 year old Willie Mitchell then I disagree and really can't continue this conversation. If you're saying that the Canucks in summer 2016 shouldn't try and make a trade for what the team thought to be a 24 year old top 4 RHD because the team was aging and spinning their wheels then I also disagree and can't see us agreeing.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,489
6,378
I thought the Gudbranson trade was poor value.

Sorry, but I can't hold it in any longer. Deal with it.

In hindsight ya. But at the time of the trade I don't think there were many here who didn't think we paid a big price for Gudbranson. To be clear, what I was responding to was the suggestion that we had given up on McCann for a replacement level Dman because he was big. That's just not true. Again, we can argue over poor scouting or Gudbranson the player being a poor target. That is different from saying trading for what the team viewed as a 24 year old top 4 RHD with size is a bad idea. Like there were a couple of years were Tanev for Lilejegren was one of the most popolar trade ideas. Brandon Carlo was talked about a lot as well. Heck we're keeping Myers for 3 more years.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad