Striiker
Former Flyers Fan
Yeah, some scoring in a tiny sample, where he's shooting 22.73% and has an on-ice sh% of 12.37%, sure proves he's not a bottom 6 forward.
Cates has been pretty solid, last 19 games (first 10 were a clusterf---- for everyone):
CF 50.24%, xGF 50.66%, xGFrel +2.81.
But he's only scoring 0.99 pp/60 at 5x5.
Part of the problem is linemates, I'd expect his scoring to increase with Hayes and TK, rather than MacEwen.
Part of the problem may simply be he's not a playmaker, and is better in a complementary role.
I'm curious to see Brink in April? I think he could raise the game of some of our centers with his playmaking skills.
So glad we signed Hayes to that contract so he can fill that #2 center spotEven after his big game, Frost is 1.04 pp/60 the last 19 games to Cates' 0.99.
Both centers are over their heads in the top six, both centers have had subpar linemates until the last few games.
Problem is Laughton just isn't a center outside of a 4C forechecking role.
Hayes can score for both teams at center.
Sedlak is a solid 4C, could probably be a 3C with better wings than Deslauriers, MacEwen or Brown.
We don't have a 1C or a 2C, so Frost and Cates have been forced into those roles.
Cates - Frost - Tippett would probably be a heck of a 3rd line, now if we could just get Couts back, Gauthier develop as a center, TK, Farabee, Hayes and Brink as top 6 wings.
Unfortunately, if we don't get Berard, is there another top 6 caliber center in the top 10?
Which is probably a good argument to trade Provorov for a young center with upside.
Do you actually believe any of the stuff that you type?Hayes was fine with AV, problem is Torts' puts a lot more emphasis on skating and defense.
If Couts returns, it'll be interesting to see how he fares, whether he can skate near 100%.
Hayes still has a solid future as a wing, I think he started as a RW before moving to center in NY.
On the wing, he doesn't have to skate as much and has more limited defensive responsibilities.
Which is why he may work well with Cates, who is more limited offensively but responsible defensively at center.
Do you actually believe any of the stuff that you type?
And when we don't break the current season into arbitrary small samples, the rates are:Even after his big game, Frost is 1.04 pp/60 the last 19 games to Cates' 0.99.
First ten games were a clusterf--- for everyone. The team clearly turned around after that point, so nothing arbitrary at all, took a while to play the way Torts wanted them to play.And when we don't break the current season into arbitrary small samples, the rates are:
Frost - 1.53 ESP/60 in 29 games - 354:04
Cates - 0.88 ESP/60 in 30 games - 410:51.
I dunno. Maybe the guy you spent three plus years saying was a solid free agent center signing by Fletcher?They aren't "forcing" anything.
Who else would you play at center?
Hayes was before his injuries, he's a little slower now, in a scheme that puts a premium on speed and defense at center.I dunno. Maybe the guy you spent three plus years saying was a solid free agent center signing by Fletcher?
The scheme may require speed but their record shows they don't have it.Yeah, Sedlak and Brown and Cates ooze speed at the center ice position. I love a shifting narrative: Hayes’ points are up because he’s healthy now, what a player! But also: he’s permanently slower, crippled really, and will never play the center ice position again — a darn shame. And yet, he’s also one of the better puck carriers.
I’d love for someone to even tell me what the scheme is that requires speed. Because there is no speed on the roster. They don’t play fast.