Confirmed with Link: Flyers Re-Sign Nick Seeler To Two Year Deal ($775K) (One-Way/Two-Way)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
87,465
159,047
South Jersey
Need help to read this signing: is this the signing that matters or the one that doesn't matter?
I can hear this argument coming:

"Well you see since it looks to be a one-way deal this year and a two-way deal the following season it means that the Flyers are going to let the kids play this year with Seeler as a 7D and they'll see what happens. The following year they'll start to make their push to be competetive where they can just have Seeler in the minors. Chuck won! Holmgren is gone! It's just the 7D so he won't play much. It's not a big deal"
 

Columbus Hockey Dad

Registered User
Oct 30, 2018
1,044
1,501
I remember last summer when we were assured Seeler wouldn't matter at all. As the 7D he wouldn't play, and he wouldn't block youth.

He played 43 games and blocked youth.
And that's the thing. If it were just for insurance in case a cataclysmic event occurs and we lose 5 or 6 d-men to injury/Covid, fine. But we now know it's not, and he'll play in a decent chunk of games over the kids that need to play. It's disgusting.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
129,202
168,640
Armored Train
And that's the thing. If it were just for insurance in case a cataclysmic event occurs and we lose 5 or 6 d-men to injury/Covid, fine. But we now know it's not, and he'll play in a decent chunk of games over the kids that need to play. It's disgusting.

Yeah. The org doesn't treat the 7D as a slot that plays in one or two games until the callups arrives. He's a regular roster player. The first and preferred backup. Not a fill-in.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
129,202
168,640
Armored Train
Rev up those excuses.

"He'll hardly play"
"It doesn't matter"
"Hextall/coaches/Scott made him do it"

Also, how tf was this a priority. 2 months out from free agency, and Chuck doesn't even think twice about bringing back this absolute plug for 2 years?

Patehtic.

The defensive results were so good, how do you not keep that band together?
 

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
77,704
124,905
Losing at the margins yet again.

Was it really necessary to get this done ahead of free agency? A late August dumpster dive would find a actual nhler rather than this tryhard ahler who they will overplay

Guess the unintentional tank is firmly on

He's a good ole' Minnesota boy though and they are "comfortable" with him. That's what matters most.
 

trostol

Learn to swim, Learn to swim
Jan 30, 2012
16,694
17,090
R'lyeh
blackadder-confused.gif
 

FLYguy3911

Sanheim Lover
Oct 19, 2006
54,106
88,802
In all seriousness:

1. The contract shouldn't matter. It can be buried.
2. It almost certainly will matter because...hockey
3. Hockey Guys rushing to sign a depth defenseman like this to a two year deal is just peak for the sport. That's rhetorical. It's because he fights and is "tough to play against". The second year is going to be annoying from a 50 contract limit standpoint (see: Patrick Brown and every AHLer Fletcher gave two year deals to).
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad