Gregor Samsa
Registered User
- Sep 5, 2020
- 4,715
- 5,407
London Police are who need to be answering some serious questions.
I don't agree with what Hockey Canada did, but you can't trust businesses to do the right thing.
We are supposed to be able to trust the police to do the right thing though.
or memes--I will start--you need to be in your 50s to get this oneWhat is a moniker is made for each person, is that allowed instead of real names?
If you took a shot for every time I said out loud "okay, time to shut this down until names are official", you'd be dead from alcohol poisoning.
Everything ESPN has and will release about this will have been gone over and scrutinized by lawyers to ensure that their asses are covered legally regardless of how the case plays out. This includes not explicitly linking the LOAs to the case. Their risk of being sued is 0.Yeah, I'm sure HFBoards is at a greater risk for being sued than ESPN
Everything ESPN has and will release about this will have been gone over and scrutinized by lawyers to ensure that their asses are covered legally regardless of how the case plays out. This includes not explicitly linking the LOAs to the case. Their risk of being sued is 0.
No.London Police are who need to be answering some serious questions.
I don't agree with what Hockey Canada did, but you can't trust businesses to do the right thing.
We are supposed to be able to trust the police to do the right thing though.
I wonder if anything has been said about this.
Probably not. Well, maybe one day Bear will quit shitposting memes and self-portraits and do something that clarifies your question in some way.
Furthermore, HFBoards and individual HF users have been publicly threatened with legal action in the past by high-profile members of the hockey community because of comments made on this site.Everything ESPN has and will release about this will have been gone over and scrutinized by lawyers to ensure that their asses are covered legally regardless of how the case plays out. This includes not explicitly linking the LOAs to the case. Their risk of being sued is 0.
Posters here are claiming they know for a fact who the 5 are and should be able to discuss it as fact with none of the scrutinizing. If they're allowed to and then it turns out only 4 of the 5 names are correct, say Dubé's LOA was actually for mental health reasons, then HFBoards is put at legal risk. So yeah, HFBoards would be at greater risk than ESPN.
Yeah, it's pretty simple, but my main point was that they'll report in a way that protects them legally, many posters here have already made it clear that if they were allowed to discuss it they would either have no intent to do that and/or they wouldn't know how. A bunch of lawyers was an exaggeration but I'm sure they're scrutinizing everything they release to be safe.No, it'll just go in front of any editor with half a brain and they'll get it right. This isn't sticky or challenging reportage, this is basic journo 101 stuff. Don't need a lawyer reading every 400-word blurb about a case, if you found a way to f*** that up you wouldn't have earned a degree.
I'm sorry that the "why" has been explained several times - most prominently in the 1st post of this thread - and you keep asking but why not?So Ted,
While I appreciate the passive aggressive smart ass response it of course didn’t actually address the context of what I wrote.
When Bear responded to me and said the ESPN article used “amid sexual assault allegations” before naming every player he was implying that that does not mean they have been directly named.
The mod post you quoted is quite different - which is why I asked the question you felt compelled to answer unhelpfully.
Isn't that the guy from the office everyone loves ?I don’t know why people act like they cannot discuss this without naming people. Like, I can discuss the actions, investigation, manifesto, etc of the Unabomber without mentioning Ted Kaczynski by name.
We don’t know the details. Neither do they. For all they know the girl wanted a gangbang.
We don’t know the details. Neither do they. For all they know the girl wanted a gangbang.
I don’t know why people act like they cannot discuss this without naming people. Like, I can discuss the actions, investigation, manifesto, etc of the Unabomber without mentioning Ted Kaczynski by name.
The NHL and PA will let the police do their job first, as they should.Both the NHL investigation and the Hockey Canada appeal process regarding the suspensions will be hushed up until after any criminal proceedings.
They don't have to hush it up, but the NHL and Hockey Canada prioritize minimizing scrutiny of their own rather than minimizing rape enabling culture.
It's pretty clear that any improvements will come despite these two institutions, not because of them.